SI-CBPAR: Towards structural indicators of community-based participatory action research

被引:1
|
作者
Meyerson, Beth E. [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
Russell, Danielle M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Mahoney, Arlene [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Garnett, Irene [5 ]
Samorano, Savannah [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Harm Reduct Res Lab, Tucson, AZ 85711 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Family & Community Med, Tucson, AZ 85711 USA
[3] Univ Arizona Hlth Sci, Comprehens Pain & Addict Ctr, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Justice Studies, Tempe, AZ USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Harm Reduct Res Lab, Drug Policy Res & Advocacy Board, Tucson, AZ USA
[6] Southwest Recovery Alliance, Phoenix, AZ USA
[7] Univ Arizona, Family & Community Med, 655 N Alvernon Way, Tucson, AZ 85711 USA
关键词
community-institutional relations; harm reduction; people who use drugs; instrument development; engagement measurement; ENGAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/dar.13764
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction; Structural aspects of community-engaged research are not well measured yet have critical implications for community research empowerment. This is particularly so with people who use drugs. We introduce the Structural Indicators of Community-Based Participatory Action Research (SI-CBPAR) to measure structural indicators of community-research entity relationships.Methods: A three-phased process of iterative development, feasibility and applicability assessment was used to examine the instrument with community-engaged studies as a first stage of instrument development. The development team included people with university, non-government organisation and lived/ing drug use experience. Four studies on the health of people who use drugs were reviewed for indicator evidence followed by iterative discussion about construct and item discrepancies. Indicators were measured for the degree to which they were observed using a three-point scale.Results: All but two constructs were confirmed for meaning. Constructs of 'community' and 'coalition' required revision and explanation. The need for further exploration of power differentials between community and community-based organisations was identified. Indicator evidence was found for all six categories across studies. The instrument was deemed applicable and easy to use. It was observed that categories could apply to studies with various degrees of community engagement and to other research focal areas.Discussion and Conclusions: SI-CBPAR applicability testing and initial category confirmation indicate its potential utility for community research collaboratives. The next phase of development involves cognitive interviewing with researchers from across community engaged research orientations, and with communities engaged in research beyond drug user health.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1061
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reciprocity An ethic for community-based participatory action research
    Maiter, Sarah
    Simich, Laura
    Jacobson, Nora
    Wise, Julie
    [J]. ACTION RESEARCH, 2008, 6 (03) : 305 - 325
  • [2] Editorial: Community-based Participatory Action Research with Agroecology
    Gliessman, Steve
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, 2009, 33 (08): : 799 - 800
  • [3] A Hermeneutics of Love for Community-Based, Participatory Action Research
    McInerney, Robert Garfield
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 56 (03) : 263 - 285
  • [4] Community-Based Participatory Research
    Deitrick, Sabina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PRACTICE, 2014, 22 (04) : 499 - 502
  • [5] The Application of Community-Based Participatory Action Research to the Study of Paraphilias
    Skye Stephens
    Kailey Roche
    Ian V. McPhail
    [J]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2020, 49 : 2789 - 2798
  • [6] Community-Based Participatory Research
    Perry, J. Adam
    [J]. ADULT EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2017, 67 (02) : 160 - 161
  • [7] The Application of Community-Based Participatory Action Research to the Study of Paraphilias
    Stephens, Skye
    Roche, Kailey
    McPhail, Ian V.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2020, 49 (08) : 2789 - 2798
  • [8] Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR): Towards Equitable Involvement of Community in Psychology Research
    Collins, Susan E.
    Clifasefi, Seema L.
    Stanton, Joey
    Straits, Kee J. E.
    Gil-Kashiwabara, Eleanor
    Espinosa, Patricia Rodriguez
    Nicasio, Andel V.
    Andrasik, Michele P.
    Hawes, Starlyn M.
    Miller, Kimberly A.
    Nelson, Lonnie A.
    Orfaly, Victoria E.
    Duran, Bonnie M.
    Wallerstein, Nina
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 73 (07) : 884 - 898
  • [9] Community-based participatory climate action
    Restrepo-Mieth, Andrea
    Perry, Jocelyn
    Garnick, Jonah
    Weisberg, Michael
    [J]. GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 6
  • [10] Our HMoob American College Paj Ntaub: student-engaged Community-Based Participatory Action Research (CBPAR) as counter-invisibility work
    Smolarek, Bailey B.
    Wolfgram, Matthew
    Vang, Mai Neng
    Xiong, Choua P.
    Lee, Lena
    Lee, Pangzoo
    Thao, Myxee
    Vang, Kia
    Xiong, Pa Kou
    Xiong, Odyssey
    Xiong, Pheechai
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE STUDIES IN EDUCATION, 2023, 36 (06) : 1018 - 1038