A Two-Player Resource-Sharing Game with Asymmetric Information

被引:0
|
作者
Wijewardena, Mevan [1 ]
Neely, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
来源
GAMES | 2023年 / 14卷 / 05期
关键词
resource-sharing games; congestion games; potential games; worst-case utility maximization; drift-plus penalty method; CONGESTION GAMES; EQUILIBRIA;
D O I
10.3390/g14050061
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper considers a two-player game where each player chooses a resource from a finite collection of options. Each resource brings a random reward. Both players have statistical information regarding the rewards of each resource. Additionally, there exists an information asymmetry where each player has knowledge of the reward realizations of different subsets of the resources. If both players choose the same resource, the reward is divided equally between them, whereas if they choose different resources, each player gains the full reward of the resource. We first implement the iterative best response algorithm to find an epsilon-approximate Nash equilibrium for this game. This method of finding a Nash equilibrium may not be desirable when players do not trust each other and place no assumptions on the incentives of the opponent. To handle this case, we solve the problem of maximizing the worst-case expected utility of the first player. The solution leads to counter-intuitive insights in certain special cases. To solve the general version of the problem, we develop an efficient algorithmic solution that combines online convex optimization and the drift-plus penalty technique.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A two-player game of life
    Levene, M
    Roussos, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS C, 2003, 14 (02): : 195 - 201
  • [2] A resource-sharing game with relative priorities
    Doncel, J.
    Ayesta, U.
    Brun, O.
    Prabhu, B.
    [J]. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, 2014, 79 : 287 - 305
  • [3] Is it better to give information, receive it, or be ignorant in a two-player game?
    McNamara, JM
    Wilson, EMK
    Houston, AI
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2006, 17 (03) : 441 - 451
  • [5] A two-player iterated survival game
    Wakeley, John
    Nowak, Martin
    [J]. THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 2019, 125 : 38 - 55
  • [6] A two-player portfolio tracking game
    Moritz Voß
    [J]. Mathematics and Financial Economics, 2022, 16 : 779 - 809
  • [7] A two-player portfolio tracking game
    Voss, Moritz
    [J]. MATHEMATICS AND FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 16 (04) : 779 - 809
  • [8] The Logic Game: A Two-Player Game of Propositional Logic
    Hicks, Daniel J.
    Milanese, John
    [J]. TEACHING PHILOSOPHY, 2015, 38 (01) : 77 - 93
  • [9] Average lengths for the two-player Name Game
    Neal, David K.
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL GAZETTE, 2007, 91 (520): : 51 - 58
  • [10] Chesskell: A Two-Player Game at the Type Level
    Bailey, Toby
    Gale, Michael B.
    [J]. HASKELL '21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH ACM SIGPLAN INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HASKELL, 2021, : 110 - 121