Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the avatera system™: a prospective pilot study

被引:3
|
作者
Gkeka, Kristiana [1 ]
Kallidonis, Panagiotis [1 ]
Peteinaris, Angelis [1 ]
Katsakiori, Paraskevi [1 ]
Tatanis, Vasileios [1 ]
Faitatziadis, Solon [1 ]
Spinos, Theodoros [1 ]
Vagionis, Athanasios [1 ]
Vrettos, Theofanis [2 ]
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe [3 ]
Liatsikos, Evangelos [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Dept Urol, Patras, Greece
[2] Univ Patras, Dept Anesthesiol, Intens Care Unit, Patras, Greece
[3] Univ Hosp Leipzig, Dept Urol, Leipzig, Germany
[4] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
[5] Univ Patras, Dept Urol, Patras 26500, Greece
来源
MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY | 2024年 / 76卷 / 01期
关键词
Robotic surgical procedures; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; CONTINENCE RECOVERY; URINARY CONTINENCE;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05545-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is a minimally invasive, safe procedure preferred in the management of localized prostate cancer. In this study, we present our initial experience with the avatera (TM) system (avateramedical GmbH, Jena, Germany) in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.METHODS: A total of fourteen patients underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using this newly introduced system in our department from June 2022 to October 2022. The primary endpoints of the study were the time and the successful completion of the operation, the hemoglobin drop and the presence of complications. The pathologic tumor stage and the presence of positive surgical margins were also recorded. Follow-up of the patients for the functional outcomes over a period of 3 months took place.RESULTS: The completion of all the surgeries was successful. The median draping and docking times were 9.5 minutes (7-13) and 10 minutes (5-40), respectively. The median console time was 103.5 minutes (90-121). No conversion to laparoscopic or open prostatectomy was necessary. The median hemoglobin drop was 1.95 g/dL (0.3-2.7), while positive surgical margins were present in two patients postoperatively. No major complications or need for transfusion were noticed. Six months after the procedure, 78.6% of the participants were continent while 77.7% of the nerve-sparing patients reported erections adequate for intercourse.CONCLUSIONS: All the operations were completed successfully without major complications or significant blood loss. The functional outcomes were acceptable according to the literature. Based on the early outcomes, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the avatera (TM) system (avateramedical GmbH) could be considered feasible, safe, and efficient.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 59
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robot-Assisted Radical Nephrectomy Using the Novel Avatera Robotic Surgical System: A Feasibility Study in a Porcine Model
    Gkeka, Kristiana
    Tsaturyan, Arman
    Faitatziadis, Solon
    Peteinaris, Angelis
    Anaplioti, Eirini
    Pagonis, Konstantinos
    Vagionis, Athanasios
    Tatanis, Vasileios
    Vrettos, Theofanis
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (03) : 273 - 278
  • [2] Robot-Assisted radical Prostatectomy
    Wagner, Christian
    Addali, Mustapha
    Witt, Joern H.
    [J]. AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2020, 51 (05) : 483 - 497
  • [3] ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Hosseini, Abolfazl
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 : A37 - A37
  • [4] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy feasibility and setting with the Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery system
    Sarchi, Luca
    Mottaran, Angelo
    Bravi, Carlo Andrea
    Paciotti, Marco
    Farinha, Rui
    Piazza, Pietro
    Puliatti, Stefano
    De Groote, Ruben
    De Naeyer, Geert
    Gallagher, Anthony
    Breda, Alberto
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 130 (05) : 671 - 675
  • [5] INITIAL EXPERIENCE OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY USING HINOTORI SURGICAL ROBOT SYSTEM
    Kanehira, Mitsugu
    Moriwaka, Makoto
    Toyoshima, Moe
    Kurokawa, Masahiro
    Takahashi, Kenta
    Shiomi, Ei
    Ishii, Shuhei
    Ikarashi, Daiki
    Maekawa, Shigekatsu
    Kato, Renpei
    Takata, Ryo
    Sugimura, Jun
    Abe, Takaya
    Obara, Wataru
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E1284 - E1284
  • [6] Outpatient Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Feasibility Study
    Congnard, Doria
    Vincendeau, Sebastien
    Lahjaouzi, Ahmed
    Neau, Anne-Cecile
    Chaize, Cecile
    Estebe, Jean-Pierre
    Mathieu, Romain
    Beloeil, Helene
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2019, 128 : 16 - 21
  • [7] Outpatient Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Feasibility Study
    Zhang, J. J. H.
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2019, 128 : 21 - 22
  • [8] Anatomic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Joseph, J. V.
    Capello, S. A.
    Patel, H. P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 339 - 339
  • [9] The Case for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Martinez-Salamanca, Juan I.
    Rao, Sandhya
    Ramanathan, Rajan
    Leung, Robert
    Mandhani, Anil
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (09) : 2039 - 2043
  • [10] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and a parachute
    Sood, Akshay
    Abdollah, Firas
    Menon, Mani
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (06) : 820 - +