Supports and constraints to middle leadership development in higher education: A Q-methodology study

被引:6
|
作者
Chaaban, Youmen [1 ]
Qadhi, Saba [2 ,3 ]
Al-Thani, Hessa [4 ]
Floyd, Alan [5 ]
Du, Xiangyun [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Qatar Univ, Coll Educ, Educ Res Ctr, POB 2713,Al Jamiaa St, Doha, Qatar
[2] Qatar Univ, Common Core Program, Doha, Qatar
[3] Qatar Univ, Coll Educ, Doha, Qatar
[4] Qatar Univ, Coll Educ, Educ Sci, Doha, Qatar
[5] Univ Reading, Educ Leadership & Management, Reading, England
[6] Aalborg Univ, UNESCO Ctr Problem & Project Based Learning, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Middle leadership development; higher education; complexity thinking; Q methodology; Qatar; DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP; UNIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1177/17411432231174092
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Middle leadership development in a Higher Education context can be understood as a complex endeavor, influenced by interactions and interrelations within multiple systems. We explored the perspectives of thirty-five male and female middle leaders on the conditions influencing their leadership development at one university in Qatar. Q methodology was applied to collect and analyze data quantitatively and qualitatively. A 40-statement Q-sample was developed based on a proposed conceptual framework inspired by complexity thinking, and consisting of three dimensions; intrapersonal, relational, and institutional. Q factor analysis revealed four significantly different viewpoints regarding the conditions that participants perceived were most influential for their leadership development, namely (1) institutional goals, (2) a culture of trust, (3) senior leadership support, and (4) personal ambitions. Despite the differences in viewpoints, three common constraints to leadership development were also identified. The study has implications for middle leadership development, with its distinctive methodological, theoretical, and contextual contributions.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Middle leaders' sensemaking of their leadership practices in response to educational disruption: A Q-methodology study
    Chaaban, Youmen
    Sawalhi, Rania
    Lundberg, Adrian
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION & LEADERSHIP, 2023,
  • [3] Exploring student and teacher perceptions of ChatGPT use in higher education: A Q-Methodology study
    Espartinez, Alma S.
    [J]. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 7
  • [4] "Sorting Out" collective leadership: How Q-methodology can be used to evaluate leadership development
    Militello, Matthew
    Benham, Maenette K. P.
    [J]. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2010, 21 (04): : 620 - 632
  • [5] Leadership and the hidden politics of co-produced research: a Q-methodology study
    Durose, Catherine
    Perry, Beth
    Richardson, Liz
    Dean, Rikki
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2023, 26 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [6] Exploring perceptions of the impacts of resource development: A Q-methodology study
    Chapman, Rachel
    Tonts, Matthew
    Plummer, Paul
    [J]. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2015, 2 (03): : 540 - 551
  • [7] Revealing stakeholders' perspectives on educational language policy in higher education through Q-methodology
    Alkhateeb, Hadeel
    Al Hamad, Muntasir
    Mustafawi, Eiman
    [J]. CURRENT ISSUES IN LANGUAGE PLANNING, 2020, 21 (04) : 415 - 433
  • [8] Q-METHODOLOGY IN THE STUDY OF CHILD PHENOMENOLOGY
    TAYLOR, P
    DELPRATO, DJ
    KNAPP, JR
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 1994, 44 (02): : 171 - 183
  • [9] Q-methodology: An alternative approach to research in nurse education
    Barker, Janet H.
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2008, 28 (08) : 917 - 925
  • [10] Attitudes to poverty in Slovakia: a Q-methodology study
    Babincak, Peter
    Jencopal'ova, Liliana
    [J]. SOCIAL IDENTITIES, 2022, 28 (01) : 41 - 59