Diagnostic efficiency of the FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) panel: a systematic review and meta- analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Yang, Mei [1 ]
Tao, Chuanmin [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
BCID panel; blood cultures; BSI infection; FilmArray; multiplex PCR; POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION; RAPID IDENTIFICATION; STREAM INFECTIONS; MULTIPLEX PCR; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; PATHOGENS; BACTERIA; MICROORGANISMS; PERFORMANCE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1099/jmm.0.001608
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Introduction. The FilmArray blood culture identification panel (BCID) panel is a multiplex PCR assay with high sensitivity and specificity to identify the most common pathogens in bloodstream infections (BSIs). Hypothesis. We hypothesize that the BCID panel has good diagnostic performance for BSIs and can be popularized in clinical application. Aim: To provide summarized evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of the BCID panel for the identification of positive blood cultures. Methodology. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases through March 2021 and assessed the efficacy of the diagnostic test of the BCID panel. We performed a meta-analysis and calculated the summary sensitivity and specificity of the BCID panel. Systematic review protocols were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number CRD42021239176). Results. A total of 16 full -text articles were eligible for analysis. The overall sensitivities of the BCID panel on Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi were 97 % (95 % CI, 0.96-0.98), 100 % (95 % CI, 0.98-01.00) and 99 % (95 % CI, 0.87-1.00), respectively. The pooled diagnostic specificities were 99 % (95 % CI, 0.97-1.00), 100 % (95 % CI, 1.00-1.00) and 100 % (95 % CI, 1.00-1.00) for Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, respectively. Conclusions. The BCID panel has high rule -in value for the early detection of BSI patients. The BCID panel can still provide valuable information for ruling out bacteremia or fungemia in populations with low pretest probability.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Utility of the FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel for the Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis
    Caunedo-Jimenez, Maria
    Fernandez-Colomer, Belen
    Fernandez-Suarez, Jonathan
    Arias-Llorente, Rosa Patricia
    Lareu-Vidal, Sonia
    Mantecon-Fernandez, Laura
    Solis-Sanchez, Gonzalo
    Suarez-Rodriguez, Marta
    MICROORGANISMS, 2023, 11 (03)
  • [2] The Significance of FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel (FA-BCID) for Managing Patients with Positive Blood Cultures
    Widyasari, Kristin
    Lee, Seungjun
    Cho, Oh-Hyun
    Hong, Sun-In
    Ryu, Byung-Han
    Kim, Sunjoo
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (21)
  • [3] Diagnostic test accuracy of the BioFire® FilmArray® meningitis/encephalitis panel: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tansarli, G. S.
    Chapin, K. C.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2020, 26 (03) : 281 - 290
  • [4] Performance of BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel (BCID2) for the detection of bloodstream pathogens and their associated resistance markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
    Peri, Anna Maria
    Ling, Weiping
    Furuya-Kanamori, Luis
    Harris, Patrick N. A.
    Paterson, David L.
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [5] Performance of BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel (BCID2) for the detection of bloodstream pathogens and their associated resistance markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
    Anna Maria Peri
    Weiping Ling
    Luis Furuya-Kanamori
    Patrick N. A. Harris
    David L. Paterson
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 22
  • [6] Mathematical model of the cost-effectiveness of the BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel molecular rapid diagnostic test compared with conventional methods for identification of Escherichia coli bloodstream infections
    Mponponsuo, Kwadwo
    Leal, Jenine
    Spackman, Eldon
    Somayaji, Ranjani
    Gregson, Daniel
    Rennert-May, Elissa
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2022, 77 (02) : 507 - 516
  • [7] MicroRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for Tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta- analysis
    Daniel, Evangeline Ann
    Sathiyamani, Balakumaran
    Thiruvengadam, Kannan
    Vivekanandan, Sandhya
    Vembuli, Hemanathan
    Hanna, Luke Elizabeth
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [8] Concordance of the filmarray blood culture identification panel 2 and classical microbiological methods in a bacteriemia diagnostic unit
    Garcia-Rivera, Celia
    Parra-Grande, Monica
    Merino, Esperanza
    Boix, Vicente
    Rodriguez, Juan C.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2022, 104 (04)
  • [9] Diagnostic accuracy of the BioFire FilmArray blood culture identification panel when used in critically ill patients with sepsis
    Rule, Roxanne
    Paruk, Fathima
    Becker, Piet
    Neuhoff, Matthew
    Chausse, Julian
    Said, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 189
  • [10] Clinical Evaluation of the FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel in Identification of Bacteria and Yeasts from Positive Blood Culture Bottles
    Altun, Osman
    Almuhayawi, Mohammed
    Ullberg, Mans
    Ozenci, Volkan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 51 (12) : 4130 - 4136