Genital Hypoplasia before Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: Does the Robotic Peritoneal Flap Method Create Equivalent Vaginal Canal Outcomes?

被引:3
|
作者
Blasdel, Gaines [1 ]
Kloer, Carmen [3 ]
Parker, Augustus [4 ]
Shakir, Nabeel [5 ]
Zhao, Lee C. [1 ]
Bluebond-Langner, Rachel [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[2] NYU, Hansjorg Wyss Dept Plast Surg, New York, NY USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[4] NYU, Grossman Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[5] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Vattikuti Urol Inst, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
PENILE INVERSION VAGINOPLASTY; THICKNESS SKIN-GRAFT; RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000010011
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Insufficient genital tissue has been reported as a barrier to achieving depth in gender-affirming vaginoplasty. The authors sought to characterize vaginal depth and revision outcomes in patients with genital hypoplasia undergoing robotic peritoneal flap vaginoplasty. Methods: Retrospective case-control analysis of patients undergoing robotic peritoneal vaginoplasty between September of 2017 and August of 2020 was used. All 43 patients identified as having genital hypoplasia (genital length <7 cm) were included with 49 random controls from the remaining patients with greater than 7 cm genital length. Baseline clinical characteristics and perioperative variables were recorded to identify potential confounders. Outcomes measured included vaginal size reported at last visit and undergoing revision surgery for depth or for vulvar appearance. Results: Patients were well matched other than median body mass index at the time of surgery, which was greater in the hypoplasia cohort by 3.6 kg/m(2) (P < 0.0001). Patients had a median of 1-year of follow-up, with a minimum follow-up of 90 days. No significant differences in outcomes were observed, with a median vaginal depth of 14.5 cm (interquartile range, 13.3 to 14.5 cm), and a median width of dilator used of 3.8 cm (interquartile range, 3.8 to 3.8 cm). No depth revisions were observed, and an 11% (n = 10) rate of external revision occurred. Conclusions: Patients with genital hypoplasia had equivalent dilation outcomes in a case-control analysis with consistent follow-up past 90 days. The robotic peritoneal flap vaginoplasty technique provides vaginal depth of 14 cm or greater regardless of genital tissue before surgery. Further investigation with patient-reported outcome measures is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 874
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Gender-affirming Robotic Tubularized Peritoneal Vaginoplasty: Feasibility and Outcomes
    Johnston, Ashley W.
    Soyster, Mary E.
    Koch, Michael O.
    Roth, Joshua D.
    UROLOGY, 2025, 195 : 191 - 198
  • [2] ROBOTIC PERITONEAL FLAP VAGINOPLASTY FOR VAGINAL HYPOPLASIA AND AGENESIS
    Schwartz, Dora Jericevic
    Alford, Ashley
    Brucker, Benjamin M.
    Zhao, Lee C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E837 - E837
  • [3] Editorial Comment on "Gender-affirming Robotic Tubularized Peritoneal Vaginoplasty: Feasibility and Outcomes"
    Sineath, R. Craig
    Dy, Geolani W.
    UROLOGY, 2025, 195 : 199 - 199
  • [4] OUTCOMES OF 429 PRIMARY ROBOTIC PERITONEAL FLAP GENDER AFFIRMING VAGINOPLASTY CASES
    Blasdel, Gaines
    Dubach-Reinhold, Charles
    Castle, Elijah
    Bluebond-Langner, Rachel
    Zhao, Lee
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E403 - E403
  • [5] A COMPARISON OF PRIMARY GENDER-AFFIRMING VAGINOPLASTY OUTCOMES: PENILE INVERSION VERSUS ROBOTIC-ASSISTED PERITONEAL FLAP
    Sljivich, Michaela
    Kahan, Dan
    Allan, Chantal J.
    Palese, Michael
    Wiklund, Peter
    Djordjevic, Miroslav
    Purohit, Rajveer S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E633 - E633
  • [6] Robotic Peritoneal Flap vs. Perineal Penile Inversion Techniques for Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty
    Peters, Blair R.
    Martin, Leigh H.
    Butler, Christi
    Dugi, Daniel
    Dy, Geolani W.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2022, 23 (10) : 211 - 218
  • [7] Robotic Peritoneal Flap vs. Perineal Penile Inversion Techniques for Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty
    Blair R. Peters
    Leigh H. Martin
    Christi Butler
    Daniel Dugi
    Geolani W. Dy
    Current Urology Reports, 2022, 23 : 211 - 218
  • [8] Reply to Editorial Comment on "Gender-affirming Robotic Tubularized Peritoneal Vaginoplasty: Feasibility and Outcomes"
    Yong, Courtney
    Roth, Joshua D.
    UROLOGY, 2024, 195 : 200 - 200
  • [9] Mending the Gap: AlloDerm as a Safe and Effective Option for Vaginal Canal Lining in Revision Robotic Assisted Gender Affirming Peritoneal Flap Vaginoplasty
    Parker, Augustus
    Brydges, Hilliard
    Blasdel, Gaines
    Bluebond-Langner, Rachel
    Zhao, Lee C.
    UROLOGY, 2023, 173 : 204 - 208
  • [10] Is there a role for Acellular Dermal Matrix for vaginal canal lining in primary gender-affirming vaginoplasty?
    Le, David
    Aryanpour, Zain
    Higuchi, Ty
    Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSGENDER HEALTH, 2025,