Transparency and explainability of AI systems: From ethical guidelines to requirements

被引:21
|
作者
Balasubramaniam, Nagadivya [1 ]
Kauppinen, Marjo [1 ]
Rannisto, Antti [1 ,2 ]
Hiekkanen, Kari [1 ,3 ]
Kujala, Sari [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Espoo, Finland
[2] Solita, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Haaga Hel Univ Appl Sci, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Transparency; Explainability; Ethical guidelines; Quality requirements; Explainability requirements; AI systems;
D O I
10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107197
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Context and Motivation: Recent studies have highlighted transparency and explainability as important quality requirements of AI systems. However, there are still relatively few case studies that describe the current state of defining these quality requirements in practice.Objective: This study consisted of two phases. The first goal of our study was to explore what ethical guidelines organizations have defined for the development of transparent and explainable AI systems and then we inves-tigated how explainability requirements can be defined in practice.Methods: In the first phase, we analyzed the ethical guidelines in 16 organizations representing different in-dustries and public sector. Then, we conducted an empirical study to evaluate the results of the first phase with practitioners. Results: The analysis of the ethical guidelines revealed that the importance of transparency is highlighted by almost all of the organizations and explainability is considered as an integral part of transparency. To support the definition of explainability requirements, we propose a model of explainability components for identifying explainability needs and a template for representing explainability requirements. The paper also describes the lessons we learned from applying the model and the template in practice.Contribution: For researchers, this paper provides insights into what organizations consider important in the transparency and, in particular, explainability of AI systems. For practitioners, this study suggests a systematic and structured way to define explainability requirements of AI systems. Furthermore, the results emphasize a set of good practices that help to define the explainability of AI systems.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transparency and Explainability of AI Systems: Ethical Guidelines in Practice
    Balasubramaniam, Nagadivya
    Kauppinen, Marjo
    Hiekkanen, Kari
    Kujala, Sari
    [J]. REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING: FOUNDATION FOR SOFTWARE QUALITY, REFSQ 2022, 2022, 13216 : 3 - 18
  • [2] Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systems
    Ehsan, Upol
    Liao, Q. Vera
    Muller, Michael
    Riedl, Mark O.
    Weisz, Justin D.
    [J]. CHI '21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2021,
  • [3] Candidate Solutions for Defining Explainability Requirements of AI Systems
    Balasubramaniam, Nagadivya
    Kauppinen, Marjo
    Truong, Hong-Linh
    Kujala, Sari
    [J]. REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING: FOUNDATION FOR SOFTWARE QUALITY, REFSQ 2024, 2024, 14588 : 129 - 146
  • [4] Bias, Explainability, Transparency, and Trust for AI-Enabled Military Systems
    Pace, Teresa
    Ranesb, Bryan
    [J]. ASSURANCE AND SECURITY FOR AI-ENABLED SYSTEMS, 2024, 13054
  • [5] Transparency and precision in the age of AI: evaluation of explainability-enhanced recommendation systems
    Govea, Jaime
    Gutierrez, Rommel
    Villegas-Ch, William
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 7
  • [6] Ethical Guidelines for Solving Ethical Issues and Developing AI Systems
    Balasubramaniam, Nagadivya
    Kauppinen, Marjo
    Kujala, Sari
    Hiekkanen, Kari
    [J]. PRODUCT-FOCUSED SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT (PROFES 2020), 2020, 12562 : 331 - 346
  • [7] Establishing Appropriate Trust in AI through Transparency and Explainability
    Kim, Sunnie S. Y.
    [J]. EXTENDED ABSTRACTS OF THE 2024 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, CHI 2024, 2024,
  • [8] Should explainability be a fifth ethical principle in AI ethics?
    João Figueiredo Nobre Brito Cortese
    Fabio Gagliardi Cozman
    Marcos Paulo Lucca-Silveira
    Adriano Figueiredo Bechara
    [J]. AI and Ethics, 2023, 3 (1): : 123 - 134
  • [9] THE PARADOX OF TRANSPARENCY IN AI: OPACITY AND EXPLAINABILITY. ALLOCATION OF RESPONSABILITY
    Blazquez Ruiz, F. Javier
    [J]. REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE PENSAMIENTO POLITICO, 2022, (17): : 261 - 272
  • [10] Ethical Considerations of Artificial Intelligence: Ensuring Fairness, Transparency, and Explainability
    Abbu, Haroon
    Mugge, Paul
    Gudergan, Gerhard
    [J]. 2022 IEEE 28TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (ICE/ITMC) & 31ST INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, IAMOT JOINT CONFERENCE, 2022,