Application of analgesics in emergency services in Germany: a survey of the medical directors

被引:1
|
作者
Vilcane, Signe [1 ]
Scharonow, Olga [2 ]
Weilbach, Christian [1 ]
Scharonow, Maximilian [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch MHH, St Josefs Hosp Cloppenburg, Acad Teaching Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol Intens Care Med Emergency Med &, Krankenhausstr 13, D-49661 Cloppenburg, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch MHH, St Josefs Hosp Cloppenburg, Dept Internal Med, Acad Teaching Hosp, Cloppenburg, Germany
关键词
Analgesia; Administration and dosage; Prehospital emergency care; Medical directors; ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; PREHOSPITAL ANALGESIA; PAIN MANAGEMENT; PARAMEDICS; MORPHINE; FENTANYL; QUALITY; PREVALENCE; TRAUMA; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12873-023-00878-8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundTreatment of acute pain is an essential element of pre-hospital care for injured and critically ill patients. Clinical studies indicate the need for improvement in the prehospital analgesia.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to assess the current situation in out of hospital pain management in Germany regarding the substances, indications, dosage and the delegation of the use of analgesics to emergency medical service (EMS) staff.Material and methodsA standardized survey of the medical directors of the emergency services (MDES) in Germany was carried out using an online questionnaire. The anonymous results were evaluated using the statistical software SPSS (Chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney-U test).ResultsSeventy-seven MDES responsible for 989 rescue stations and 397 EMS- physician bases in 15 federal states took part in this survey. Morphine (98.7%), Fentanyl (85.7%), Piritramide (61%), Sufentanil (18.2%) and Nalbuphine (14,3%) are provided as opioid analgesics. The non-opioid analgesics (NOA) including Ketamine/Esketamine (98,7%), Metamizole (88.3%), Paracetamol (66,2%), Ibuprofen (24,7%) and COX-2-inhibitors (7,8%) are most commonly available. The antispasmodic Butylscopolamine is available (81,8%) to most rescue stations.Fentanyl is the most commonly provided opioid analgesic for treatment of a traumatic pain (70.1%) and back pain (46.8%), Morphine for visceral colic-like (33.8%) and non-colic pain (53.2%). In cases of acute coronary syndrome is Morphine (85.7%) the leading analgesic substance. Among the non-opioid analgesics is Ketamine/Esketamine (90.9%) most frequently provided to treat traumatic pain, Metamizole for visceral colic-like (70.1%) and non-colic (68.6%) as well as back pain (41.6%). Butylscopolamine is the second most frequently provided medication after Metamizole for "visceral colic-like pain" (55.8%).EMS staff (with or without a request for presence of the EMS physician on site) are permitted to use the following: Morphine (16.9%), Piritramide (13.0%) and Nalbuphine (10.4%), and of NOAs for (Es)Ketamine (74.1%), Paracetamol (53.3%) and Metamizole (35.1%). The dosages of the most important and commonly provided analgesic substances permitted to independent treatment by the paramedics are often below the recommended range for adults (RDE). The majority of medical directors (78.4%) of the emergency services consider the independent application of analgesics by paramedics sensible. The reason for the relatively rare authorization of opioids for use by paramedics is mainly due to legal (in)certainty (53.2%).ResultsSeventy-seven MDES responsible for 989 rescue stations and 397 EMS- physician bases in 15 federal states took part in this survey. Morphine (98.7%), Fentanyl (85.7%), Piritramide (61%), Sufentanil (18.2%) and Nalbuphine (14,3%) are provided as opioid analgesics. The non-opioid analgesics (NOA) including Ketamine/Esketamine (98,7%), Metamizole (88.3%), Paracetamol (66,2%), Ibuprofen (24,7%) and COX-2-inhibitors (7,8%) are most commonly available. The antispasmodic Butylscopolamine is available (81,8%) to most rescue stations.Fentanyl is the most commonly provided opioid analgesic for treatment of a traumatic pain (70.1%) and back pain (46.8%), Morphine for visceral colic-like (33.8%) and non-colic pain (53.2%). In cases of acute coronary syndrome is Morphine (85.7%) the leading analgesic substance. Among the non-opioid analgesics is Ketamine/Esketamine (90.9%) most frequently provided to treat traumatic pain, Metamizole for visceral colic-like (70.1%) and non-colic (68.6%) as well as back pain (41.6%). Butylscopolamine is the second most frequently provided medication after Metamizole for "visceral colic-like pain" (55.8%).EMS staff (with or without a request for presence of the EMS physician on site) are permitted to use the following: Morphine (16.9%), Piritramide (13.0%) and Nalbuphine (10.4%), and of NOAs for (Es)Ketamine (74.1%), Paracetamol (53.3%) and Metamizole (35.1%). The dosages of the most important and commonly provided analgesic substances permitted to independent treatment by the paramedics are often below the recommended range for adults (RDE). The majority of medical directors (78.4%) of the emergency services consider the independent application of analgesics by paramedics sensible. The reason for the relatively rare authorization of opioids for use by paramedics is mainly due to legal (in)certainty (53.2%).ResultsSeventy-seven MDES responsible for 989 rescue stations and 397 EMS- physician bases in 15 federal states took part in this survey. Morphine (98.7%), Fentanyl (85.7%), Piritramide (61%), Sufentanil (18.2%) and Nalbuphine (14,3%) are provided as opioid analgesics. The non-opioid analgesics (NOA) including Ketamine/Esketamine (98,7%), Metamizole (88.3%), Paracetamol (66,2%), Ibuprofen (24,7%) and COX-2-inhibitors (7,8%) are most commonly available. The antispasmodic Butylscopolamine is available (81,8%) to most rescue stations.Fentanyl is the most commonly provided opioid analgesic for treatment of a traumatic pain (70.1%) and back pain (46.8%), Morphine for visceral colic-like (33.8%) and non-colic pain (53.2%). In cases of acute coronary syndrome is Morphine (85.7%) the leading analgesic substance. Among the non-opioid analgesics is Ketamine/Esketamine (90.9%) most frequently provided to treat traumatic pain, Metamizole for visceral colic-like (70.1%) and non-colic (68.6%) as well as back pain (41.6%). Butylscopolamine is the second most frequently provided medication after Metamizole for "visceral colic-like pain" (55.8%).EMS staff (with or without a request for presence of the EMS physician on site) are permitted to use the following: Morphine (16.9%), Piritramide (13.0%) and Nalbuphine (10.4%), and of NOAs for (Es)Ketamine (74.1%), Paracetamol (53.3%) and Metamizole (35.1%). The dosages of the most important and commonly provided analgesic substances permitted to independent treatment by the paramedics are often below the recommended range for adults (RDE). The majority of medical directors (78.4%) of the emergency services consider the independent application of analgesics by paramedics sensible. The reason for the relatively rare authorization of opioids for use by paramedics is mainly due to legal (in)certainty (53.2%).ConclusionEffective analgesics are available for EMS staff in Germany, the approach to improvement lies in the area of application. For this purpose, the adaptations of the legal framework as well as the creation of a guideline for prehospital analgesia are useful.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of analgesics in emergency services in Germany: a survey of the medical directors
    Signe Vilcane
    Olga Scharonow
    Christian Weilbach
    Maximilian Scharonow
    [J]. BMC Emergency Medicine, 23
  • [2] Prehospital stroke treatment in German-speaking countries Survey of medical directors of emergency medical services in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland
    Lier, Martin
    Euler, Maximilian
    Roessler, Markus
    Liman, Jan
    Goericke, Meike Bettina
    Baubin, Michael
    Mueller, Stefan Matthias
    Kunze-Szikszay, Nils
    [J]. NOTFALL & RETTUNGSMEDIZIN, 2024, 27 (03): : 195 - 203
  • [3] Use of prehospital ultrasound in North America: A survey of emergency medical services medical directors
    Taylor J.
    McLaughlin K.
    McRae A.
    Lang E.
    Anton A.
    [J]. BMC Emergency Medicine, 14 (1)
  • [4] Review of emergency paramedic competencies - survey on implementation and frameworks condition by directors of medical emergency services
    Ostmeier, Stefan
    Eismann, Hendrik
    Hofmann, Thomas
    Flentje, Markus
    [J]. NOTARZT, 2021, 37 (05): : 270 - 277
  • [5] Designated Medical Directors for Emergency Medical Services: Recruitment and Roles
    Slifkin, Rebecca T.
    Freeman, Victoria A.
    Patterson, P. Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2009, 25 (04): : 392 - 398
  • [6] Development of Emergency Medical Services in Germany - Western Part of Germany
    Sefrin, Peter
    [J]. ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 2013, 48 (11-12): : 734 - 738
  • [7] Quo vadis, preclinical emergency physician? Results of a survey of emergency medical services in Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany)
    Luiz, T.
    Jung, J.
    Flick, S.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIST, 2014, 63 (04): : 294 - 302
  • [8] A Brief Survey of Karachis Emergency Medical Services
    Nadir, N.
    Razzak, J.
    Bloem, C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 60 (04) : S122 - S122
  • [9] Implementing a Statewide Prehospital Sepsis Protocol: Perspectives of Emergency Medical Services Medical Directors
    Garfinkel, Eric
    Tanigawa, Makoto
    Margolis, Asa
    Levy, Matthew
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (10)
  • [10] MEDICAL EMERGENCY SERVICES IN WEST-GERMANY AND AUSTRIA
    PACY, H
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1978, 2 (12) : 566 - 566