Trunnions and Modularity in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Historical Review With Current Clinical Implications

被引:3
|
作者
Vajapey, Sravya P. [1 ]
Shah, Vivek M. [2 ]
Estok, Daniel M., II [2 ]
机构
[1] Rainier Orthoped Inst, Dept Orthoped Surg, Puyallup, WA 98374 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Boston, MA USA
关键词
TAPER CORROSION; POLYETHYLENE; FRACTURE; METAL; RISK; STEM; FAILURE; DESIGN; MODES;
D O I
10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00498
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Trunnion in total hip arthroplasty refers to the interface between the neck of a femoral stem and the femoral head. Clinical complications arising from damage to this junction, whether it be due to mechanical wear, corrosion, or a combination, are referred to as mechanically assisted crevice corrosion (MACC), also commonly known as trunnionosis. With the use of modular hip prostheses, which help customize offset and leg length to an individual patient's anatomy, the incidence of MACC and revision due to MACC has increased in recent years. Although the cause of MACC is multifactorial, with patient factors and technique factors contributing to this condition, taper design and geometry, metallurgical properties of implants, and size mismatch of the bearing couple are some of the implant factors that have also been implicated in this clinical phenomenon. Understanding the history of taper design and geometry, the track record of older implants, and the rationale behind the development of current prostheses can help surgeons choose the right implants for their patients and accurately assess the pros and cons of new implants being introduced to the market each year.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 197
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modularity in primary total hip arthroplasty
    Cameron, HU
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1996, 11 (03): : 332 - 334
  • [2] THE IMPACT OF MODULARITY IN TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY
    CHMELL, MJ
    RISPLER, D
    POSS, R
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1995, (319) : 77 - 84
  • [3] CONCERNS WITH MODULARITY IN TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY
    BOBYN, JD
    TANZER, M
    KRYGIER, JJ
    DUJOVNE, AR
    BROOKS, CE
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1994, (298) : 27 - 36
  • [4] The rationale and performance of modularity in total hip arthroplasty
    Heim, CS
    Greenwald, AS
    [J]. ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 28 (09) : S1113 - S1115
  • [5] Modularity of the Femoral Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Srinivasan, Anand
    Jung, Edward
    Levine, Brett Russell
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2012, 20 (04) : 214 - 222
  • [6] The role of modularity in primary total hip arthroplasty
    Cameron, Hugh U.
    Keppler, Louis
    McTighe, Tim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (04): : 89 - 92
  • [7] Comprehensive Review of Current Constraining Devices in Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Van der Merwe, Johannes Michiel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2018, 26 (14) : 479 - 488
  • [8] Offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty: Important: A current review
    Oommen, Anil Thomas
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 15 (08):
  • [9] A review of the use of modularity in total shoulder arthroplasty
    Zuckerman, JD
    Cavallo, RJ
    Kummer, FJ
    [J]. MODULARITY OF ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, 1997, 1301 : 5 - 18
  • [10] Head-neck modularity for total hip arthroplasty - Is it necessary?
    Hozack, WJ
    Mesa, JJ
    Rothman, RF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1996, 11 (04): : 397 - 399