Cohesive zone parametric analysis in the tensile impact strength of tubular adhesive joints

被引:4
|
作者
Silva, A. F. M., V [1 ]
Peres, L. M. C. [1 ]
Campilho, R. D. S. G. [1 ,2 ]
Rocha, R. J. B. [2 ]
Silva, F. J. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Politecn Porto, Inst Super Engn Porto, Dept Engn Mecan, Porto, Portugal
[2] INEGI Polo FEUP, Porto, Portugal
关键词
Adhesive joint; structural adhesive; finite element method; cohesive zone models; impact loading; SINGLE-LAP JOINTS; FRACTURE-TOUGHNESS; STRAIN-RATE; TEMPERATURE; BEHAVIOR; CFRP;
D O I
10.1177/09544089221088261
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The use of tubular adhesive joints has considerably grown, including applications in truss/vehicles frames and fluid transportation pipelines, but the impact performance of these joints is under addressed in the literature. It thus becomes pertinent to propose modelling techniques to predict and characterize tubular joints to withstand these loads, which involve a higher modelling complexity than the static loading case. This work evaluates, by cohesive zone modelling (CZM), the tensile impact strength of tubular joints between AW6082-T651 aluminium alloy adherends and bonded with different adhesives. Initially, CZM validation was accomplished with single-lap joint (SLJ) data. For the tubular joints, the influence of geometric parameters was evaluated by changing the overlap length (L-O) and outer tube thickness (t(SE)). The analysis begins with an elastic stress analysis to the adhesive layer, followed by maximum load (P-m) and dissipated energy at failure (U) predictions using CZM, impact velocity effect and comparison with static analytical solutions. With this study, it was possible to evaluate the different geometrical parameters, select the optimal geometry and adhesive type, and to validate the CZM technique for the impact strength prediction of tubular adhesive joints.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 37
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Geometrical and material optimization of tensile loaded tubular adhesive joints using cohesive zone modelling
    Ferreira, L. R. F.
    Campilho, R. D. S. G.
    Rocha, R. J. B.
    Barbosa, D. R.
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 2019, 95 (5-7): : 425 - 449
  • [2] Parametric cohesive zone analysis of bi-adhesive single-step joints
    D. F. T. Carvalho
    R. D. S. G. Campilho
    A. S. Vargas
    R. D. F. Moreira
    K. Madani
    SN Applied Sciences, 2023, 5
  • [3] Parametric cohesive zone analysis of bi-adhesive single-step joints
    Carvalho, D. F. T.
    Campilho, R. D. S. G.
    Vargas, A. S.
    Moreira, R. D. F.
    Madani, K.
    SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 5 (12):
  • [4] Geometrical optimization of adhesive joints under tensile impact loads using cohesive zone modelling
    Valente, J. P. A.
    Campilho, R. D. S. G.
    Marques, E. A. S.
    Machado, J. J. M.
    da Silva, Lucas F. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2020, 97
  • [5] Adhesive joint analysis under tensile impact loads by cohesive zone modelling
    Valente, J. P. A.
    Campilho, R. D. S. G.
    Marques, E. A. S.
    Machado, J. J. M.
    da Silva, L. F. M.
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2019, 222
  • [6] COHESIVE BOND STRENGTH PREDICTION FOR ADHESIVE JOINTS
    FLYNN, PL
    JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION, 1979, 7 (03) : 168 - 171
  • [7] Numerical Analysis and Optimisation of Tubular Adhesive Joints under Tensile Loading
    Cognard, J. Y.
    Devaux, H.
    Sohier, L.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 93
  • [8] Evaluation of impact tensile strength for PMMA/Al butt adhesive joints
    Wada, H
    Suzuki, K
    Murase, K
    Kennedy, TC
    IMPACT ENGINEERING AND APPLICATION, VOLS I AND II, 2001, : 463 - 468
  • [9] Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer
    Campilho, R. D. S. G.
    Banea, M. D.
    Neto, J. A. B. P.
    da Silva, L. F. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2013, 44 : 48 - 56
  • [10] COHESIVE BOND STRENGTH PREDICTION FOR ADHESIVE JOINTS.
    Flynn, P.L.
    Journal of Testing & Evaluation, 1979, 7 (03): : 168 - 171