Identifying building locations in the wildland-urban interface before and after fires with convolutional neural networks

被引:1
|
作者
Kasraee, Neda K. [1 ]
Hawbaker, Todd J. [2 ]
Radeloff, Volker C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Forest & Wildlife Ecol, SILVIS Lab, 1630 Linden Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Geosci & Environm Change Sci Ctr, Denver, CO 80225 USA
关键词
aerial photography; building detection; housing growth; machine learning; urbanisation; wildfire destruction; wildfire hazard; wildland fire; WILDFIRE;
D O I
10.1071/WF22181
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Background Wildland-urban interface (WUI) maps identify areas with wildfire risk, but they are often outdated owing to the lack of building data. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can extract building locations from remote sensing data, but their accuracy in WUI areas is unknown. Additionally, CNNs are computationally intensive and technically complex, making them challenging for end-users, such as those who use or create WUI maps, to apply.Aims We identified buildings pre- and post-wildfire and estimated building destruction for three California wildfires: Camp, Tubbs and Woolsey.Methods We evaluated a CNN-based building dataset and a CNN model from a separate commercial vendor to detect buildings from high-resolution imagery. This dataset and model represent to end-users the state of the art of what is readily available for potential WUI mapping.Key results We found moderate accuracies for the building dataset and the CNN model and a severe underestimation of buildings and their destruction rates where trees occluded buildings. The CNN model performed best post-fire with accuracies >= 73%.Conclusions Existing CNNs may be used with moderate accuracy for identifying individual buildings post-fire and mapping the extent of the WUI. The implications are, however, that CNNs are too inaccurate for post-fire damage assessments or building counts in the WUI.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 621
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling wildland and wildland-urban interface fires
    Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg
    MD, United States
    Fall Tech. Meet. East. States Sect. Combust. Inst., 2007,
  • [2] The wildland-urban interface in the United States based on 125 million building locations
    Carlson, Amanda R.
    Helmers, David P.
    Hawbaker, Todd J.
    Mockrin, Miranda H.
    Radeloff, Volker C.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2022, 32 (05)
  • [3] Nonindustrial private landowners, fires, and the wildland-urban interface
    Amacher, GS
    Malik, AS
    Haight, RG
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2005, 7 (05) : 796 - 805
  • [4] Special Issue on Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Fires
    Manzello, Samuel L.
    FIRE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 50 (01) : 7 - 8
  • [5] Wildland-urban interface fires in Norwegian coastal heathlands - Identifying risk reducing measures
    Gjedrem, Anna Marie
    Metallinou, Maria Monika
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2023, 159
  • [7] Modelling the vulnerability of urban settings to wildland-urban interface fires in Chile
    Aguirre, Paula
    Leon, Jorge
    Gonzalez-Mathiesen, Constanza
    Roman, Randy
    Penas, Manuela
    Ogueda, Alonso
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2024, 24 (04) : 1521 - 1537
  • [8] Ignition of mulch and grasses by firebrands in wildland-urban interface fires
    Manzello, Samuel L.
    Cleary, Thomas G.
    Shields, John R.
    Yang, Jiann C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2006, 15 (03) : 427 - 431
  • [9] Initial Reconnaissance of the 2011 Wildland-Urban Interface Fires in Amarillo, Texas
    Maranghides, Alexander
    Mell, William
    Ridenour, Karen
    McNamara, Derek
    FIRE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 50 (01) : 93 - 104
  • [10] A review of post-incident studies for wildland-urban interface fires
    Gaudet, Benjamin
    Simeoni, Albert
    Gwynne, Steven
    Kuligowski, Erica
    Benichou, Noureddine
    JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND RESILIENCE, 2020, 1 (01): : 59 - 65