Confronting the Convective Gray Zone in the Global Configuration of the Met Office Unified Model

被引:8
|
作者
Tomassini, Lorenzo [1 ]
Willett, Martin [1 ]
Sellar, Alistair [1 ]
Lock, Adrian [1 ]
Walters, David [1 ]
Whitall, Michael [1 ]
Sanchez, Claudio [1 ]
Heming, Julian [1 ]
Earnshaw, Paul [1 ]
Rodriguez, Jose M. [1 ]
Ackerley, Duncan [1 ]
Xavier, Prince [1 ]
Franklin, Charmaine [2 ]
Senior, Catherine A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Met Off, Exeter, England
[2] Bur Meteorol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Met Off Hadley Ctr, Exeter, England
关键词
kilometer-scale global atmospheric modeling; convective gray zone; convection-circulation interaction; atmospheric variability and predictability; EXTRATROPICAL STORM TRACKS; ASIAN SUMMER MONSOON; DEEP CONVECTION; ATMOSPHERE; PARAMETERIZATION; PARAMETRIZATION; PRECIPITATION; PREDICTION; ENSEMBLE; CLOUD;
D O I
10.1029/2022MS003418
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
In atmospheric models with kilometer-scale grids the resolution approaches the scale of convection. As a consequence the most energetic eddies in the atmosphere are partially resolved and partially unresolved. The modeling challenge to represent convection partially explicitly and partially as a subgrid process is called the convective gray zone problem. The gray zone issue has previously been discussed in the context of regional models, but the evolution in regional models is constrained by the lateral boundary conditions. Here we explore the convective gray zone starting from a defined global configuration of the Met Office Unified Model using initialized forecasts and comparing different model formulations to observations. The focus is on convection and turbulence, but some aspects of the model dynamics are also considered. The global model is run at nominal 5 km resolution and thus contributions from both resolved and subgrid turbulent and convective fluxes are non-negligible. The main conclusion is that in the present assessment, the configurations which include scale-aware turbulence and a carefully reduced and simplified mass-flux convection scheme outperform both the configuration with fully parameterized convection as well as a configuration in which the subgrid convection parameterization is switched off completely. The results are more conclusive with regard to convective organization and tropical variability than extratropical predictability. The present study thus endorses the strategy to further develop scale-aware physics schemes and to pursue an operational implementation of the global 5 km-resolution model to be used alongside other ensemble forecasts to allow researchers and forecasters to further assess these simulations.
引用
收藏
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breakdown of hydrostatic balance at convective scales in the forecast errors in the Met Office Unified Model
    Vetra-Carvalho, S.
    Dixon, M.
    Migliorini, S.
    Nichols, N. K.
    Ballard, S. P.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 138 (668) : 1709 - 1720
  • [3] An updated climatology of the troposphere-stratosphere configuration of the Met Office's Unified Model
    Jackson, DR
    Austin, J
    Butchart, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2001, 58 (14) : 2000 - 2008
  • [4] C-POOL: A scheme for modelling convective cold pools in the Met Office Unified Model
    Rooney, Gabriel G.
    Stirling, Alison J.
    Stratton, Rachel A.
    Whitall, Michael
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 148 (743) : 962 - 980
  • [5] The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 4.0 and JULES Global Land 4.0 configurations
    Walters, D. N.
    Williams, K. D.
    Boutle, I. A.
    Bushell, A. C.
    Edwards, J. M.
    Field, P. R.
    Lock, A. P.
    Morcrette, C. J.
    Stratton, R. A.
    Wilkinson, J. M.
    Willett, M. R.
    Bellouin, N.
    Bodas-Salcedo, A.
    Brooks, M. E.
    Copsey, D.
    Earnshaw, P. D.
    Hardiman, S. C.
    Harris, C. M.
    Levine, R. C.
    MacLachlan, C.
    Manners, J. C.
    Martin, G. M.
    Milton, S. F.
    Palmer, M. D.
    Roberts, M. J.
    Rodriguez, J. M.
    Tennant, W. J.
    Vidale, P. L.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 7 (01) : 361 - 386
  • [6] The Met Office Global Coupled model 2.0 (GC2) configuration
    Williams, K. D.
    Harris, C. M.
    Bodas-Salcedo, A.
    Camp, J.
    Comer, R. E.
    Copsey, D.
    Fereday, D.
    Graham, T.
    Hill, R.
    Hinton, T.
    Hyder, P.
    Ineson, S.
    Masato, G.
    Milton, S. F.
    Roberts, M. J.
    Rowell, D. P.
    Sanchez, C.
    Shelly, A.
    Sinha, B.
    Walters, D. N.
    West, A.
    Woollings, T.
    Xavier, P. K.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 8 (05) : 1509 - 1524
  • [7] The performance of FLake in the Met Office Unified Model
    Rooney, Gabriel Gerard
    Bornemann, Francisco Jorge
    [J]. TELLUS SERIES A-DYNAMIC METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 2013, 65
  • [8] Development of the Global Sea Ice 6.0 CICE configuration for the Met Office Global Coupled model
    Rae, J. G. L.
    Hewitt, H. T.
    Keen, A. B.
    Ridley, J. K.
    West, A. E.
    Harris, C. M.
    Hunke, E. C.
    Walters, D. N.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 8 (07) : 2221 - 2230
  • [9] The performance of the CoMorph-A convection package in global simulations with the Met Office Unified Model
    Lock, A. P.
    Whitall, M.
    Stirling, A. J.
    Williams, K. D.
    Lavender, S. L.
    Morcrette, C.
    Matsubayashi, K.
    Field, P. R.
    Martin, G.
    Willett, M.
    Heming, J.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2024, : 3527 - 3543
  • [10] Impacts of introducing a convective gravity-wave parameterization upon the QBO in the Met Office Unified Model
    Kim, Y. -H.
    Bushell, A. C.
    Jackson, D. R.
    Chun, H. -Y.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 40 (09) : 1873 - 1877