Effect of Interbody Implants on the Biomechanical Behavior of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Study

被引:2
|
作者
Shen, Hangkai [1 ]
Zhu, Jia [2 ]
Huang, Chenhui [1 ]
Xiang, Dingding [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Weiqiang [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] China United Engn Corp, Hangzhou 310000, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Tsinghua Shenzhen Int Grad Sch, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[3] Northeastern Univ, Sch Mech Engn & Automation, Shenyang 110057, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, State Key Lab Tribol Adv Equipment, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
finite element; porous scaffold; lumbar interbody fusion; osteoporosis; endplate stress; VIBRATION CHARACTERISTICS; OSTEOPOROSIS; CAGES; SPINE; LOAD;
D O I
10.3390/jfb14020113
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Porous titanium interbody scaffolds are growing in popularity due to their appealing advantages for bone ingrowth. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical effects of scaffold materials in both normal and osteoporotic lumbar spines using a finite element (FE) model. Four scaffold materials were compared: Ti6Al4V (Ti), PEEK, porous titanium of 65% porosity (P65), and porous titanium of 80% porosity (P80). In addition, the range of motion (ROM), endplate stress, scaffold stress, and pedicle screw stress were calculated and compared. The results showed that the ROM decreased by more than 96% after surgery, and the solid Ti scaffold provided the lowest ROM (1.2-3.4% of the intact case) at the surgical segment among all models. Compared to solid Ti, PEEK decreased the scaffold stress by 53-66 and the endplate stress by 0-33%, while porous Ti decreased the scaffold stress by 20-32% and the endplate stress by 0-32%. Further, compared with P65, P80 slightly increased the ROM (<0.03 degrees) and pedicle screw stress (<4%) and decreased the endplate stress by 0-13% and scaffold stress by approximately 18%. Moreover, the osteoporotic lumbar spine provided higher ROMs, endplate stresses, scaffold stresses, and pedicle screw stresses in all motion modes. The porous Ti scaffolds may offer an alternative for lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion by Finite Element Analysis
    Xu, Hao
    Tang, Hao
    Guan, Xuemei
    Jiang, Fugui
    Xu, Neng
    Ju, Wen
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Xiaojian
    Zhang, Qiulin
    Li, Ming
    NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 72 : 21 - 26
  • [2] The biomechanical study of a modified lumbar interbody fusion—crenel lateral interbody fusion (CLIF): a three-dimensional finite-element analysis
    Chen, Yun-lin
    Lai, Ou-jie
    Wang, Yang
    Ma, Wei-hu
    Chen, Qi-xin
    Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2020, 23 (09): : 548 - 555
  • [3] Biomechanical Evaluation of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion on the Adjacent Segment: A Finite Element Analysis
    Wang, Bingjin
    Hua, Wenbin
    Ke, Wencan
    Lu, Saideng
    Li, Xingsheng
    Zeng, Xianlin
    Yang, Cao
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 126 : E819 - E824
  • [4] The biomechanical study of a modified lumbar interbody fusion-crenel lateral interbody fusion (CLIF): a three-dimensional finite-element analysis
    Chen, Yun-lin
    Lai, Ou-jie
    Wang, Yang
    Ma, Wei-hu
    Chen, Qi-xin
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 23 (09) : 548 - 555
  • [5] Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Bilateral Expandable Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages: A Finite Element Analysis Study
    Bakhaidar, Mohamad
    Harinathan, Balaji
    Devaraj, Karthik Banurekha
    DeGroot, Andrew
    Yoganandan, Narayan
    Shabani, Saman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 18 (04):
  • [6] Biomechanical Analysis of Porous Additive Manufactured Cages for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis
    Zhang, Zhenjun
    Li, Hui
    Fogel, Guy R.
    Liao, Zhenhua
    Li, Yang
    Liu, Weiqiang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 111 : E581 - E591
  • [7] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Ploumis, Avraam
    Wu, Chunhui
    Fischer, Gustav
    Mehbod, Amir A.
    Wu, Wentien
    Faundez, Antonio
    Transfeldt, Ensor E.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2008, 21 (02): : 120 - 125
  • [8] Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion cages with various lordotic angles: a finite element study
    Zhang, Zhenjun
    Fogel, Guy R.
    Liao, Zhenhua
    Sun, Yitao
    Liu, Weiqiang
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 21 (03) : 247 - 254
  • [9] A Comparative Study of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Pawar, Abhijit Y.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Girardi, Federico P.
    Lebl, Darren R.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (05) : 668 - 674
  • [10] Biomechanical Evaluation of an Oblique Lateral Locking Plate System for Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis
    Wang, Yinge
    Wang, Jiajia
    Tu, Sha
    Li, Shuang
    Yi, Jiangpu
    Zhao, Haien
    Qiao, Huanhuan
    Yan, Kang
    Liao, Bo
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 160 : E126 - E141