Intravoxel incoherent motion predicts positive surgical margins and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Meng, Shuang [1 ]
Gan, Wanting [1 ]
Chen, Lihua [1 ]
Wang, Nan [1 ]
Liu, Ailian [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 222 Zhongshan Rd, Dalian 116011, Peoples R China
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2023年 / 128卷 / 06期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Positive surgical margins; Gleason score upgrading; MRI; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; TISSUE; SERIES; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-023-01645-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundWhether Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) can be used as a predictive tool of positive surgical margins (PSMs) and Gleason score (GS) upgrading in prostate cancer (PCa) patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) still remains unclear. The aim of this study is to explore the ability of IVIM and clinical characteristics to predict PSMs and GS upgrading.MethodsA total of 106 PCa patients after RP who underwent pelvic mpMRI (multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging) between January 2016 and December 2021 and met the requirements were retrospectively included in our study. IVIM parameters were obtained using GE Functool post-processing software. Logistic regression models were fitted to confirm the predictive risk factor of PSMs and GS upgrading. The area under the curve and fourfold contingency table were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of IVIM and clinical parameters.ResultsMultivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that percent of positive cores, apparent diffusion coefficient and molecular diffusion coefficient (D) were independent predictors of PSMs (Odds Ratio (OR) were 6.07, 3.62 and 3.16, respectively), Biopsy GS and pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*) were independent predictors of GS upgrading (OR were 0.563 and 7.15, respectively). The fourfold contingency table suggested that combined diagnosis increased the ability of predicting PSMs but had no advantage in predicting GS upgrading except the sensitivity from 57.14 to 91.43%.ConclusionsIVIM showed good performance in predicting PSMs and GS upgrading. Combining IVIM and clinical factors enhanced the performance of predicting PSMs, which may contribute to clinical diagnosis and treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 678
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intravoxel incoherent motion predicts positive surgical margins and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Shuang Meng
    Wanting Gan
    Lihua Chen
    Nan Wang
    Ailian Liu
    La radiologia medica, 2023, 128 : 668 - 678
  • [2] Preoperative prostate health index predicts adverse pathology and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Vojtech Novak
    Stepan Vesely
    Hana Luksanová
    Richard Prusa
    Otakar Capoun
    Vojtech Fiala
    Olga Dolejsová
    Hana Sedlacková
    Radek Kucera
    Jiri Stejskal
    Miroslav Zalesky
    Marko Babjuk
    BMC Urology, 20
  • [3] Preoperative prostate health index predicts adverse pathology and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Novak, Vojtech
    Vesely, Stepan
    Luksanova, Hana
    Prusa, Richard
    Capoun, Otakar
    Fiala, Vojtech
    Dolejsova, Olga
    Sedlackova, Hana
    Kucera, Radek
    Stejskal, Jiri
    Zalesky, Miroslav
    Babjuk, Marko
    BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [4] Prostate cancer: correlation of intravoxel incoherent motion MR parameters with Gleason score
    Yang, Dal Mo
    Kim, Hyun Cheol
    Kim, Sang Won
    Jahng, Geon-Ho
    Won, Kyu Yeoun
    Lim, Sung Jig
    Oh, Jang-Hoon
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2016, 40 (03) : 445 - 450
  • [5] Is Small Prostate Volume a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy?
    Chung, Mun Su
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Lee, Dong Hoon
    Chung, Byung Ha
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (04) : 902 - 906
  • [6] Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence free survival after radical prostatectomy with positive surgical margins
    Roux, V.
    Eyraud, R.
    Brureau, L.
    Gourtaud, G.
    Senechal, C.
    Fofana, M.
    Blanchet, P.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2017, 27 (8-9): : 467 - 473
  • [7] PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Schiavina, R.
    Birgatti, F.
    Guidi, M.
    Pernetti, R.
    Salama, A.
    Zukerman, Z.
    Diazzi, D.
    Borghesi, M.
    Vagnoni, V.
    Rocca, C.
    Manferrari, F.
    Concetti, S.
    Brunocilla, E.
    Bertaccini, A.
    Martorana, G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 283 - 283
  • [8] PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Martorana, Giuseppe
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Vici, Alexia
    Marini, Manola
    Zukerman, Ziv
    Diazzi, Davide
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Concetti, Sergio
    Bertaccini, Alessandro
    Garofalo, Marco
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    Manferrari, Fabio
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 31 (05) : 1949 - 1950
  • [9] FACTORS FOR PREDICTION OF GLEASON SCORE UPGRADING AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Yang, Ching-Wei
    Lin, Tzu-Ping
    Huang, Yi-Hsiu
    Chung, Hsiao-Jen
    Kuo, Junne-Yih
    Huang, William
    Wu, Howard
    Chang, Yen-Hwa
    Lin, Alex
    Chen, Kuang-Kuo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E607 - E608
  • [10] The Impact of Pathologic Upgrading of Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on the Risk of the Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy
    Park, Juhyun
    Yoo, Sangjun
    Cho, Min Chul
    Cho, Min Hyun
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kwak, Cheol
    Kim, Hyeon Hoe
    Jeong, Hyeon
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018