Assessing the Effects of Conservation Measures on Soil Erosion in Arasbaran Forests Using RUSLE

被引:0
|
作者
Sasanifar, Samira [1 ]
Alijanpour, Ahmad [1 ]
Shafiei, Abbas Banj [1 ]
Rad, Javad Eshaghi [1 ]
Molaei, Morteza [2 ]
Alvarez-Alvarez, Pedro [3 ]
机构
[1] Urmia Univ, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Forestry, Orumiyeh 5756151818, Iran
[2] Urmia Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agr Econ, Orumiyeh 5756151818, Iran
[3] Univ Oviedo, Polytech Sch Mieres, Dept Organisms & Syst Biol, E-33600 Asturias, Spain
来源
FORESTS | 2023年 / 14卷 / 10期
关键词
soil conservation; protected area; erodibility; RUSLE; Arasbaran Forests; ERODIBILITY; REGION; FARMLAND; QUALITY; INDEX;
D O I
10.3390/f14101942
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Vegetation cover is known as one of the most dominant parameters in soil erosion that can considerably affect soil erosion drivers. This study aimed to assess the effects of vegetation cover on soil conservation in Arasbaran Forests, Iran. A part of Arsbaran forests has been protected for 45 years. The other part has not been under protection during these years. This study was carried out in order to investigate the effects of forest protection management on the changes in the amount of soil erosion and compare it with the non-protection sector. To this end, 66 samples were grouped in the two selected elevation classes. Out of every three sample plots, one plot was randomly selected for collecting soil samples. Landsat 8 images and a Digital Elevation Model were utilized for sample collection via ENVI (Environment for Visualizing Images) and GIS (Geographic Information System), respectively. Then, the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) was employed to estimate the annual soil loss in the studied sites. The results showed the annual soil erosion of 9.84 and 10.06 tons per hectare/year for protected and non-protected areas, respectively. Moreover, the average annual soil erosion of 9.95 tons per hectare/year was calculated for the whole Arasbaran Forests. The results of the statistical test revealed no significant difference between protected and non-protected sites in terms of erosion rates (p > 0.05). Based on the findings, despite the non-significant and slightly lower soil loss per unit area in the protected site, there is a notable soil loss throughout the entire non-protected area. It appears necessary to conduct a thorough review of existing conservation laws and to closely monitor their effective implementation. This step is crucial for enhancing the effectiveness of forest conservation management in mitigating soil erosion. The results show that absolute forest protection alone cannot make a big difference in preventing soil erosion. In this regard, there is a need to carry silviculture measures to manage protected forest stands to increase the sustainability of the forest. Obviously, in the case of proper management along with protection, it is possible to have a greater effect in preventing soil erosion.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of soil erosion and prioritization of conservation and restoration measures using RUSLE and Geospatial techniques: the case of upper Bilate watershed
    Arega, Eliyas
    Deribew, Kiros Tsegay
    Moisa, Mitiku Badasa
    Gemeda, Dessalegn Obsi
    [J]. GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [2] Identification of soil erosion areas and soil conservation in the Ci Lutung watershed using the RUSLE method
    Rivanda, R. A.
    Kusratmoko, E.
    Rustanto, A.
    [J]. FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES OF INDONESIAN SOCIETY FOR REMOTE SENSING: THE REVOLUTION OF EARTH OBSERVATION FOR A BETTER HUMAN LIFE, 2020, 500
  • [3] Soil Erosion Prediction Using RUSLE with GIS
    Lin, Qinghui
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    [J]. 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-8, 2006, : 1086 - +
  • [4] Effects of soil conservation measures on soil erosion in the Yunnan Plateau, southwest China
    Duan, X.
    Rong, L.
    Bai, Z.
    Gu, Z.
    Ding, J.
    Tao, Y.
    Li, J.
    Wang, W.
    Yin, X.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2020, 75 (02) : 131 - 142
  • [5] Quantifying soil erosion and soil organic carbon conservation services in indian forests: A RUSLE-SDR and GIS-based assessment
    Pandey, Rajiv
    Mehta, Divya
    Kumar, Vinay
    Pradhan, Ravi Prakash
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 163
  • [6] Simulating the effects of land use changes on soil erosion using RUSLE model
    Kavian, Ataollah
    Sabet, Samaneh Hoseinpoor
    Solaimani, Karim
    Jafari, Behnoosh
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 32 (01) : 97 - 111
  • [7] Harmonizing models and measurements: Assessing soil erosion through RUSLE model
    Sidharthan, Jasin
    Pillai, Surendran Udayar
    Subbaiyan, Marimuthu
    Govindraj, Sridevi
    Kantamaneni, Komali
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (47) : 57856 - 57873
  • [8] Effects of soil conservation measures on wind erosion control in China: A synthesis
    Xiao, Liangang
    Li, Guoqing
    Zhao, Rongqin
    Zhang, Lu
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 778
  • [9] Application of GIS to Estimate Soil Erosion Using RUSLE
    Mushtak Talib Jabbar
    [J]. Geo-spatial Information Science, 2003, (01) : 34 - 37
  • [10] Soil erosion estimation in conservation tillage systems with poultry litter application using RUSLE 2.0 model
    Nyakatawa, E. Z.
    Jakkula, V.
    Reddy, K. C.
    Lemunyon, J. L.
    Norris, B. E., Jr.
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2007, 94 (02): : 410 - 419