Long-term outcomes after responsive neurostimulation for treatment of refractory epilepsy: a single-center experience of 100 cases

被引:0
|
作者
Roa, Jorge A.
Marcuse, Lara
Fields, Madeline
La Vega-Talbott, Maite
Yoo, Ji Yeoun
Wolf, Steven M.
McGoldrick, Patricia
Ghatan, Saadi
Panov, Fedor
机构
[1] Departments of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York
[2] Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Health Physicians, New York Medical College, New York, NY
[3] The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
关键词
responsive neurostimulation; epilepsy; refractory; predictor; outcome; complications; TEMPORAL-LOBE EPILEPSY; PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS; BRAIN-STIMULATION; SURGERY; AFTERDISCHARGES; THERAPY; SAFETY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.3171/2023.2.JNS222116
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Despite antiepileptic drugs, more than 30% of people with epilepsy continue to have seizures. Patients with such drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) may undergo invasive treatment such as resection, laser ablation of the epileptogenic focus, or vagus nerve stimulation, but many are not candidates for epilepsy surgery or fail to respond to such interventions. Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) provides a neuromodulatory option. In this study, the authors present a single-center experience with the use of RNS over the last 5 years to provide long-term control of seizures in patients with DRE with at least 1 year of follow-up. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected single-center database of consecutive DRE patients who underwent RNS system implantation from September 2015 to December 2020. Patients were followed-up postoperatively to evaluate seizure freedom and complications. RESULTS One hundred patients underwent RNS placement. Seven patients developed infections: 2 responded to intravenous antibiotic therapy, 3 required partial removal and salvaging of the system, and 2 required complete removal of the RNS device. No postoperative tract hemorrhages, strokes, device migrations, or malfunctions were documented in this cohort. The average follow-up period was 26.3 months (range 1-5.2 years). In terms of seizure reduction, 8 patients had 0%-24% improvement, 14 had 25%-49% improvement, 29 experienced 50%-74% improvement, 30 had 75%-99% improvement, and 19 achieved seizure freedom. RNS showed significantly better outcomes over time: patients with more than 3 years of RNS therapy had 1.8 higher odds of achieving 75% or more seizure reduction (95% CI 1.07-3.09, p = 0.02). Also, patients who had undergone resective or ablative surgery prior to RNS implantation had 8.25 higher odds of experiencing 50% or more seizure reduction (95% CI 1.05-65.1, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Responsive neurostimulator implantation achieved 50% or more seizure reduction in approximately 80% of patients. Even in patients who did not achieve seizure freedom, significant improvement in seizure duration, severity, or postictal state was reported in more than 68% of cases. Infection (7%) was the most common complication. Patients with prior resective or ablative procedures and those who had been treated with RNS for more than 3 years achieved better outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1463 / 1470
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Responsive neurostimulation for refractory epilepsy in the pediatric population: A single-center experience
    Bercu, Marian Michael
    Friedman, Daniel
    Silverberg, Alyson
    Drees, Cornelia
    Geller, Eric B.
    Dugan, Patricia C.
    Devinsky, Orrin
    Doyle, Werner H.
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2020, 112
  • [2] Safety & feasibility of responsive neurostimulation in children with refractory epilepsy: A single-center experience
    Enner, Stephanie
    El-Hallal, Maria
    Hogan, Katherine
    Rodgers, Shaun
    Karkare, Shefali
    Kothare, Sanjeev
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2024, 114 : 121 - 124
  • [3] Pregnancy Outcomes in Refractory Epilepsy Patients with Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Single-Center Experience
    Chrastina, Jan
    Dolezalova, Irena
    Novak, Zdenek
    Peslova, Eva
    Brazdil, Milan
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 83 (03) : 259 - 264
  • [4] Long-term outcomes of EPLBD: A single-center experience
    Tatsuya, Tatsuya
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 32 : 288 - 288
  • [5] Long-term effects of vagus nerve stimulation in refractory pediatric epilepsy: A single-center experience
    Yalnizoglu, Dilek
    Ardicli, Didem
    Bilginer, Burcak
    Konuskan, Bahadir
    Oguz, Kader Karli
    Akalan, Nejat
    Turanli, Guezide
    Saygi, Serap
    Topcu, Meral
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2020, 110
  • [6] Long-term psychosocial outcomes after nondirected donation: A single-center experience
    Jacobs, Cheryl
    Berglund, Danielle M.
    Wiseman, Jennifer F.
    Garvey, Catherine
    Larson, Dawn B.
    Voges, Margaret
    Breitkopf, Carmen Radecki
    Ibrahim, Hassan N.
    Matas, Arthur J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 19 (05) : 1498 - 1506
  • [7] Outcomes and Long-term Survival After Pulmonary Retransplantation: A Single-Center Experience
    Wallinder, Andreas
    Danielsson, Christian
    Magnusson, Jesper
    Riise, Gerdt C.
    Dellgren, Goran
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 108 (04): : 1037 - 1044
  • [8] A Single-Center Evaluation of Responsive Neurostimulation as Treatment for Drug-resistant Epilepsy
    Beattie, Sean
    Guerrero, Gloria Ortiz
    Uysal, Utku
    NEUROLOGY, 2023, 100 (17)
  • [9] Long-term outcomes of sigmoid diverticulitis: a single-center experience
    Mizrahi, Ido
    Al-Kurd, Abbas
    Chapchay, Katya
    Ag-Rejuan, Yael
    Simanovsky, Natalia
    Eid, Ahmed
    Mazeh, Haggi
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 221 : 8 - 14
  • [10] LONG-TERM OUTCOMES IN REBOA USE: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE
    O'Neil, Michael
    Vella, Michael
    Dumas, Ryan
    Seamon, Mark
    Cannon, Jeremy
    Qasim, Zaffer
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47