共 50 条
Same day service: A genetic testing station model to improve germline genetic testing in patients with ovarian cancer
被引:0
|作者:
Marjon, Nicole
[1
,3
]
Guerra, Rosa
[1
,4
]
Freeman, Alexandra
[1
,4
,5
]
Mak, Julie
[2
]
Cheung, Stephanie
[2
]
Gordon, Kelly
[1
,2
]
Blanco, Amie
[1
]
Ueda, Stefanie
[1
]
Chen, Lee-may
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Canc Genet & Prevent, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[4] Univ Texas, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Houston, TX 77089 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco Fresno, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div GynecologicOncol, Fresno, CA 93701 USA
关键词:
Genetic testing;
BRCA1/2;
Ovarian;
Fallopian tube;
Primary peritoneal cancer;
Genetic counseling;
Universal genetic testing;
Uptake and ef ficiency;
WOMEN;
BREAST;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.07.019
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Objective. Genetic testing for ovarian cancer (OC) patients is essential to consideration of PARP inhibitor therapy. To improve access, we piloted a Genetic Testing Station (GTS) allowing patients to have a same-day genetic testing visit facilitated by Genetic Counselor Assistants (GCAs) under the supervision of Genetic Counselors (GCs). Methods. The GTS was implemented December 2018 and operated through February 2020. Gynecologic Oncologists offered ovarian cancer patients a same-day GTS visit with a GCA. The patient received education via videos designed by GCs and then provided consent, a brief family history, and a sample for a standardized 133-gene panel. Results were provided by a GC. Patients were retrospectively identified by querying the medical record for OC patients seen 12 months prior to and 18 months after GTS implementation.Results. A total of 482 patients pre-GTS were compared to 625 patients post-GTS. Genetic testing increased from 68.5% to 75.4% (p = 0.012) after implementation, primarily in patients with epithelial histologies (80% vs 89% in pre-GTS vs post-GTS, p = 0.005). Time from referral for genetic testing to obtaining results was evaluated in the post-GTS cohort, comparing patients who had traditional counseling to those who utilized the GTS. Time to obtaining results was 21 days in the GTS group (95% CI [10, 34]) compared to 56 days (95% CI [41,76]) in the traditional genetic counseling group.Conclusions. The GTS reduces barriers to care and facilitates discussion of precision treatment within a timely fashion while optimizing GC clinic time. Access improvement remains integral to improving uptake of genetic testing.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 59
页数:7
相关论文