Same day service: A genetic testing station model to improve germline genetic testing in patients with ovarian cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Marjon, Nicole [1 ,3 ]
Guerra, Rosa [1 ,4 ]
Freeman, Alexandra [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Mak, Julie [2 ]
Cheung, Stephanie [2 ]
Gordon, Kelly [1 ,2 ]
Blanco, Amie [1 ]
Ueda, Stefanie [1 ]
Chen, Lee-may [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Canc Genet & Prevent, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[4] Univ Texas, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Houston, TX 77089 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco Fresno, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div GynecologicOncol, Fresno, CA 93701 USA
关键词
Genetic testing; BRCA1/2; Ovarian; Fallopian tube; Primary peritoneal cancer; Genetic counseling; Universal genetic testing; Uptake and ef ficiency; WOMEN; BREAST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.07.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Genetic testing for ovarian cancer (OC) patients is essential to consideration of PARP inhibitor therapy. To improve access, we piloted a Genetic Testing Station (GTS) allowing patients to have a same-day genetic testing visit facilitated by Genetic Counselor Assistants (GCAs) under the supervision of Genetic Counselors (GCs). Methods. The GTS was implemented December 2018 and operated through February 2020. Gynecologic Oncologists offered ovarian cancer patients a same-day GTS visit with a GCA. The patient received education via videos designed by GCs and then provided consent, a brief family history, and a sample for a standardized 133-gene panel. Results were provided by a GC. Patients were retrospectively identified by querying the medical record for OC patients seen 12 months prior to and 18 months after GTS implementation.Results. A total of 482 patients pre-GTS were compared to 625 patients post-GTS. Genetic testing increased from 68.5% to 75.4% (p = 0.012) after implementation, primarily in patients with epithelial histologies (80% vs 89% in pre-GTS vs post-GTS, p = 0.005). Time from referral for genetic testing to obtaining results was evaluated in the post-GTS cohort, comparing patients who had traditional counseling to those who utilized the GTS. Time to obtaining results was 21 days in the GTS group (95% CI [10, 34]) compared to 56 days (95% CI [41,76]) in the traditional genetic counseling group.Conclusions. The GTS reduces barriers to care and facilitates discussion of precision treatment within a timely fashion while optimizing GC clinic time. Access improvement remains integral to improving uptake of genetic testing.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 59
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Same day service: Using a genetic testing station and video counseling to improve genetic testing rates among ovarian cancer patients
    Marjon, Nicole
    Guerra, Rosa Alisa
    FreemanJana, Alexandra
    Ueda, Stefanie M.
    Chen, Lee-may
    Mak, Julie
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 (02) : E29 - E29
  • [2] Germline and somatic genetic testing in ovarian cancer patients
    Chandrasekaran, D.
    Manchanda, R.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 (11) : 1460 - 1460
  • [3] Genetic testing station increases access to germline genetic testing
    Hamilton, Camille
    Swiller, Mariana Niell
    Bhansali, Franceska
    Hoover, Alyssa
    Bottomley, Stephanie
    Lewis, Marisa
    Russell, Bianca
    Martinez, Julian A.
    Karlan, Beth
    Federman, Noah
    Chang, Vivian Y.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (06)
  • [4] GO-BRCA: A collaborative service model to improve access to ovarian cancer genetic testing
    Glaze, S.
    Ghatage, P.
    Desmarais, S.
    Kohut, R.
    Sweeney, P.
    Perrier, R.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 149 : 127 - 127
  • [5] Closing the testing gap: Trends in germline and somatic genetic testing in ovarian cancer
    Greenwood, Ashley
    Castro, Michelle
    Corr, Bradley
    Alldredge, Jill
    Guntupalli, Saketh
    Behbakht, Kian
    Bitler, Benjamin
    Walsh, Christine
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 176 : S235 - S236
  • [6] Implementation of a Telehealth Genetic Testing Station to Deliver Germline Testing for Men With Prostate Cancer
    Kwon, Daniel H.
    Gordon, Kelly M.
    Tong, Barry
    Borno, Hala T.
    Beigh, Makenna
    Fattah, Delaire
    Schleicher, Alexandra
    Aggarwal, Rahul R.
    Blanco, Amie M.
    Small, Eric J.
    Dhawan, Mallika
    [J]. JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2023, 19 (05) : 307 - +
  • [8] Predictors of germline genetic testing referral and completion in ovarian cancer patients at a Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Saylor, Katherine W.
    Fernandes, Elizabeth Q.
    Adams, Michael
    Paraghamian, Sarah
    Shalowitz, David I.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 186 : 53 - 60
  • [9] Mainstreaming in parallel with ovarian cancer tumor testing to improve genetic testing uptake
    Byrne, Maureen
    Sia, Tiffany Y.
    Fong, Christopher
    Khurram, Aliya
    Waters, Michele
    Kemel, Yelena M.
    Zhou, Qin
    Ranganathan, Megha
    Roche, Kara Long
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Saban, Sally
    Wu, Michelle
    Varice, Nancy
    Hamilton, Jada G.
    Carrot-Zhang, Jian
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Iasonos, Alexia
    Ellenson, Lora H.
    Mandelker, Diana
    Weigelt, Britta
    Brown, Carol L.
    Aghajanian, Carol
    Stadler, Zso fi
    Liu, Ying L.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 183 : 126 - 132
  • [10] Universal Germline Genetic Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Promises and challenges
    Pathak, Rima Sanjay
    Sarin, Rajiv
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND PAEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 43 (02) : 193 - 194