Learning for Air Traffic Management: guidelines for future AI systems

被引:0
|
作者
Cocchioni, M. [1 ]
Bonelli, S. [1 ]
Westin, C. [2 ]
Borst, C. [3 ]
Bang, M. [2 ]
Hilburn, B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Deep Blue, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] Linkoping Univ, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
[4] Ctr Human Performance Res, Voorburg, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/2526/1/012105
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The SESAR-funded Modern ATM via Human / Automation Learning Optimisation (MAHALO) project recently completed two years of technical work exploring the human performance impacts of AI and Machine Learning (ML), as applied to enroute ATC conflict detection and resolution (CD&R). It first developed a hybrid ML CD&R capability, along with a realtime simulation platform and experimental User Interface. After a series of development trials, the project culminated in a pair of field studies (i.e., human-in-the-loop trials) across two EU countries, with a total of 35 operational air traffic controllers. In each of these two field studies, controller behaviour was first captured in a pre-test phase, and used to train the ML system. Subsequent main experiment trials then experimentally manipulated within controllers both Conformance (as either a personalised-, group average-, or optimized model) and Transparency (as ether a baseline vector depiction, an enhanced graphical diagram, or a diagramplus-text presentation). The proposed paper presents guidelines on the design and implementation of ML systems in Air Traffic Control, derived from the results and lesson learned from the Simulations, as well as the qualitative feedback received from the controllers themselves.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Human-in-the-loop AI: Requirements on future (unified) air traffic management systems
    Lundberg, Jonas
    Bang, Magnus
    Johansson, Jimmy
    Cheaitou, Ali
    Josefsson, Billy
    Tahboub, Zain
    [J]. 2019 IEEE/AIAA 38TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2019,
  • [2] Information Security in Future Air Traffic Management Systems
    Casado, Enrique
    Rodriguez, Rosa
    Taboso, Pedro
    Garcia, Javier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2016, 13 (03): : 101 - 112
  • [3] Role of planning systems in future air traffic management
    Winter, H.
    [J]. Deutsche Luft - und Raumfahrt, Mitteilung, 1991, (91-08): : 9 - 1
  • [4] Security Requirements for SATCOM Datalink Systems for Future Air Traffic Management
    Bernsmed, Karin
    Froystad, Christian
    Meland, Per Hakon
    Myrvoll, Tor Andre
    [J]. 2017 IEEE/AIAA 36TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2017,
  • [5] Communication and the future of air traffic management
    Miller, ME
    Dougherty, SP
    [J]. 2004 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-6, 2004, : 1628 - 1635
  • [6] A Survey on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and eXplainable AI in Air Traffic Management: Current Trends and Development with Future Research Trajectory
    Degas, Augustin
    Islam, Mir Riyanul
    Hurter, Christophe
    Barua, Shaibal
    Rahman, Hamidur
    Poudel, Minesh
    Ruscio, Daniele
    Ahmed, Mobyen Uddin
    Begum, Shahina
    Rahman, Md Aquif
    Bonelli, Stefano
    Cartocci, Giulia
    Di Flumeri, Gianluca
    Borghini, Gianluca
    Babiloni, Fabio
    Arico, Pietro
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [7] Learning methods for air traffic management
    Rehm, F
    Klawonn, F
    [J]. SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3571 : 992 - 1001
  • [8] Future air traffic management systems and financial decision-making constraints
    Peter Brooker
    [J]. Transportation, 2004, 31 : 1 - 20
  • [9] Future air traffic management systems and financial decision-making constraints
    Brooker, P
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 2004, 31 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [10] Envisaging the Future Air Traffic Management System
    Neal, Andrew
    Flach, John
    Mooij, Martijn
    Lehmann, Stefan
    Stankovic, Stephanie
    Hasenbosch, Samuel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AVIATION PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 21 (01): : 16 - 34