Really just a little prick? A meta-analysis on adverse events in placebo control groups of seasonal influenza vaccination RCTs

被引:8
|
作者
Bender, F. L. [1 ,2 ]
Rief, W. [1 ]
Wilhelm, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Philipps Univ Marburg, Dept Psychol, Div Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Marburg, Germany
[2] Philipps Univ Marburg, Dept Psychol, Div Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Gutenbergstr 18, D-35032 Marburg, Germany
关键词
Vaccination; Influenza; Vaccine hesitancy; Reactogenicity; Nocebo; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; HEALTHY-ADULTS; VIRUS-VACCINES; SAFETY; IMMUNOGENICITY; EFFICACY; ANTIBODY; HEMAGGLUTININ; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.033
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The Corona pandemic and ongoing mass vaccinations raise the question of the nocebo mechanisms involved. Since immunization is usually administered to healthy people as a preventive health measure, adverse events (AE) following immunization are less accepted and could contribute to vaccine hesitancy. Assuming that vaccinees experience nocebo responses, the aim of this meta -analysis was to investigate the effect sizes of solicited adverse events (or assumed reactogenicity) reported in placebo groups in RCTs on seasonal influenza vaccination.Methods: Literature search via PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL was conducted considering gray literature. Only RCTs with placebo groups using pharmacologically inert substances (like saline) were included. Quality was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool. Effect sizes were esti-mated using a random mixed effects model based on k = 31 studies covering 14,326 participants in pla-cebo groups.Results: Reported solicited AEs in placebo groups showed significant effect sizes of proportions (ESp). In k = 13 analyzed placebo groups, 35 % of the participants reported at least one solicited systemic AE (p = 0.007). The most common particular solicited systemic AEs were headache (k = 27; 17 %; p = 0.001), malaise (k = 13; 12 %; p = 0.004), and hyperhidrosis (k = 4; 12 %; p < 0.001) within one week after vaccination.Conclusion: The results show significant solicited AEs in placebo groups, indicating substantial nocebo responses after vaccination. Based on the fact that most vaccination programs include similar groups of healthy people, we expect that comparable nocebo effects occur during other campaigns. Health care professionals should be aware of the nocebo response and take action to prevent or decrease the burden of adverse events following immunization. Fear of side effects must be addressed early in order to dimin-ish vaccine hesitancy.Prospero identifier: CRD42020156287, October 2019.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 303
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seasonal influenza vaccination: A meta-analysis on adverse events in placebo groups of randomized controlled trials
    Bender, Friederike Louise
    Rief, Winfried
    Wilhelm, Marcel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2021, 28 (SUPPL 1) : S143 - S144
  • [2] ADVERSE EVENTS OF PLACEBO FOR PARTICIPANTS IN PHARMACOLOGICAL RCTS FOR INSOMNIA - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Werner, C. P.
    Faasse, K.
    Sharpe, L.
    Holsteg, S.
    Hackett, M.
    Glozier, N.
    Colagiuri, B.
    [J]. SLEEP MEDICINE, 2019, 64 : S417 - S418
  • [3] Sex differences in adverse events following seasonal influenza vaccines: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Kiely, Marilou
    Tadount, Fazia
    Lo, Ernest
    Sadarangani, Manish
    Wei, Shu Qin
    Rafferty, Ellen
    Quach, Caroline
    Macdonald, Shannon E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2023, 77 (12) : 791 - 801
  • [4] Intravenous immune globulin and thromboembolic adverse events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs
    Ammann, Eric M.
    Haskins, Cole B.
    Fillman, Kelsey M.
    Ritter, Rebecca L.
    Gu, Xiaomei
    Winiecki, Scott K.
    Carnahan, Ryan M.
    Torner, James C.
    Fireman, Bruce H.
    Jones, Michael P.
    Chrischilles, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2016, 91 (06) : 594 - 605
  • [5] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Seasonal Influenza Vaccination of Health Workers
    Li, Tingting
    Qi, Xiaoling
    Li, Qin
    Tang, Wenge
    Su, Kun
    Jia, Mengmeng
    Yang, Weizhong
    Xia, Yu
    Xiong, Yu
    Qi, Li
    Feng, Luzhao
    [J]. VACCINES, 2021, 9 (10)
  • [6] Meta-Analysis Comparing the Relative Risk of Adverse Events for Amiodarone Versus Placebo
    Ruzieh, Mohammed
    Moroi, Morgan K.
    Aboujamous, Nader M.
    Ghahramani, Mehrdad
    Naccarelli, Gerald V.
    Mandrola, John
    Foy, Andrew J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 124 (12): : 1889 - 1893
  • [7] INFLUENZA VACCINATION AND REDUCTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS-A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Udell, J. A.
    Farkouh, M. E.
    Bhatt, D. L.
    Cannon, C. P.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 28 (05) : S161 - S161
  • [8] Meta-analysis confirms the protective Effect of Influenza Vaccination before cardiovascular Events
    Oezcelik, C.
    [J]. KARDIOLOGE, 2014, 8 (01): : 10 - 10
  • [9] COVID-19 Vaccination Is Not Associated with Psychiatric Adverse Events: A Meta-Analysis
    Lee, Sang-Eun
    Shim, Sung-Ryul
    Youn, Jung-Hae
    Han, Hyun-Wook
    [J]. VACCINES, 2023, 11 (01)
  • [10] A Meta-analysis of intradermal versus intramuscular influenza vaccines: Immunogenicity and Adverse Events
    Marra, Fawziah
    Young, Flora
    Richardson, Kathryn
    Marra, Carlo A.
    [J]. INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2013, 7 (04) : 584 - 603