Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:4
|
作者
Chiew, John Keong [1 ]
Low, Christopher Jer Wei [1 ]
Zeng, Kieran [2 ]
Goh, Zhi Jie [3 ]
Ling, Ryan Ruiyang [1 ]
Chen, Ying [1 ,4 ]
Ti, Lian Kah [1 ,5 ]
Ramanathan, Kollengode [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Agcy Sci Technol & Res, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Natl Univ Heart Ctr, Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiac Thorac & Vasc Surg,Cardiothorac Inten, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Natl Univ Heart Ctr, Cardiothorac Intens Care Unit, Level 9,1E Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119228, Singapore
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2023年 / 137卷 / 03期
关键词
ARTERY-BYPASS-SURGERY; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; PULMONARY-FUNCTION; CORONARY SURGERY; TROPONIN-T; ANALGESIA; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000006532
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND:Research on fast-track recovery protocols postulates that thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) in cardiac surgery contributes to improved postoperative outcomes. However, concerns about TEA's safety hinder its widespread usage. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the benefits and risks of TEA in cardiac surgery. METHODS:We searched 4 databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the use of TEA against only general anesthesia (GA) in adults undergoing cardiac surgery, up till June 4, 2022. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses, evaluated risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool, and rated certainty of evidence via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Primary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU), hospital length of stay, extubation time (ET), and mortality. Other outcomes included postoperative complications. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted on all outcomes to elicit statistical and clinical benefit. RESULTS:Our meta-analysis included 51 RCTs (2112 TEA patients and 2220 GA patients). TEA significantly reduced ICU length of stay (-6.9 hours; 95% confidence interval [CI], -12.5 to -1.2; P = .018), hospital length of stay (-0.8 days; 95% CI, -1.1 to -0.4; P < .0001), and ET (-2.9 hours; 95% CI, -3.7 to -2.0; P < .0001). However, we found no significant change in mortality. TSA found that the cumulative Z-curve passed the TSA-adjusted boundary for ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and ET, suggesting a clinical benefit. TEA also significantly reduced pain scores, pooled pulmonary complications, transfusion requirements, delirium, and arrhythmia, without additional complications such as epidural hematomas, of which the risk was estimated to be CONCLUSIONS:TEA reduces ICU and hospital length of stay, and postoperative complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with minimal reported complications such as epidural hematomas. These findings favor the use of TEA in cardiac surgery and warrant consideration for use in cardiac surgeries worldwide.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 600
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thoracic epidural anesthesia improves outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Shengsuo
    Wu, Xinmin
    Guo, Hang
    Ma, Li
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 20
  • [2] Thoracic epidural anesthesia improves outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shengsuo Zhang
    Xinmin Wu
    Hang Guo
    Li Ma
    European Journal of Medical Research, 20
  • [3] Xenon Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Law, Lawrence Siu-Chun
    Lo, Elaine Ah-Gi
    Gan, Tong Joo
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 122 (03): : 678 - 697
  • [4] Intrathecal Morphine for Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ciconini, Luis Eduardo
    Ramos, Wanessa Amanda
    Fonseca, Amanda Cyntia Lima
    Nooli, Nishankkumar Patel
    Gosling, Andre Fiche
    ANNALS OF CARDIAC ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 27 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [5] Oral Pregabalin in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wang, Xian-xue
    Dai, Jing
    Hu, Xing-guo
    Zhou, Ai-guo
    Pan, Dao-bo
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [6] Meta-analysis of Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia versus General Anesthesia for Cardiac Surgery
    Svircevic, Vesna
    van Dijk, Diederik
    Nierich, Arno P.
    Passier, Martijn P.
    Kalkman, Cor J.
    van der Heijden, Geert J. M. G.
    Bax, Leon
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 114 (02) : 271 - 282
  • [7] Efficacy of antidepressants in functional dyspepsia: Systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shanmugham, Suresh
    Zuber, Mohammed
    Chan, Jia En
    Kumar, Suresh
    Ching, Siew Mooi
    Lee, Yeong Yeh
    Vadakkechalil, Harsha
    Veettil, Sajesh K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, : 24 - 34
  • [8] Epidural injections in prevention of surgery for spinal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Bicket, Mark C.
    Horowitz, Joshua M.
    Benzon, Honorio T.
    Cohen, Steven P.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (02): : 348 - 362
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant in Epidural Analgesia and Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhang, Xu
    Wang, Dong
    Shi, Min
    Luo, YuanGuo
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2017, 37 (04) : 343 - 354
  • [10] Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant in Epidural Analgesia and Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Xu Zhang
    Dong Wang
    Min Shi
    YuanGuo Luo
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2017, 37 : 343 - 354