How narcissism relates to upward-status disagreement in virtual project design teams

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Tianyue [1 ,2 ]
Benson, Alex J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Fac Social Sci, Dept Psychol, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Social Sci Ctr, London, ON N6A 5C2, Canada
关键词
Narcissism; status; status disagreement; Small groups; Social rank; SELF-ENHANCEMENT; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; MODEL; POPULARITY; HIERARCHY; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; ACCURACY; BIAS;
D O I
10.1080/15298868.2024.2314922
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Despite people's adeptness at discerning group members' status, disagreements over who ranks higher (i.e., upward-status disagreement; USD) are frequent. In this study, we evaluated how different dimensions of narcissism, which are intertwined with the pursuit of status, relate to status attainment, perception, and ultimately USDs. Following virtual task-oriented teams across three time points, we found that narcissistic admiration did not relate to status attainment or perception, yet was linked to early and consistent involvement in USDs. In contrast, narcissistic rivalry predicted other-status devaluation across all time points and a decrease in absolute status over time. The findings reveal how distinct dimensions of narcissism differentially contribute to status dynamics in teams across different stages of social interaction.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 69
页数:21
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Learning virtual teams: how to design a set of Web 2.0 tools?
    Divine, M.
    Schumacher, M.
    Stal-Le Cardinal, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2011, 55 (3-4) : 297 - 308
  • [2] Designing SMART teamwork: How work design can boost performance in virtual teams
    Klonek, Florian
    Parker, Sharon K.
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 2021, 50 (01)
  • [3] How Multi-Disciplinary Teams Can Improve the Sustainable Design Process and Project
    Harrison, Theresa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE 2019: LEADING RESILIENT COMMUNITIES THROUGH THE 21ST CENTURY, 2019, : 729 - 736
  • [4] The Mind's Eye on Personal Profiles: How to Inform Initial Trustworthiness Assessments in Virtual Project Teams
    Rusman, Ellen
    van Bruggen, Jan
    Sloep, Peter
    Valcke, Martin
    Koper, Rob
    [J]. COLLABORATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 6257 : 297 - +
  • [5] Towards Semi-Virtual Design Thinking - Creativity in Dispersed Multicultural and Multidisciplinary Innovation Project Teams
    Redlich, Beke
    Dorawa, David
    Siemon, Dominik
    Lattemann, Christoph
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 51ST ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2018, : 717 - 726
  • [6] Fostering trust in virtual project teams: Towards a design framework grounded in a Trust Worthiness ANtecedents (TWAN) schema
    Rusman, Ellen
    van Bruggen, Jan
    Sloep, Peter
    Koper, Rob
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2010, 68 (11) : 834 - 850
  • [7] Design of the virtual factory planning process. Cooperation of spatially and temporally distributed, agile project teams in factory planning
    Augustin H.
    Al-Shahmani H.
    Dreßler E.
    Krafzik C.
    Liebler C.
    Schmidt P.
    [J]. 1600, Walter de Gruyter GmbH (115): : 659 - 662
  • [8] Enhancing Team Performance Through Tool Use: How Critical Technology-Related Issues Influence the Performance of Virtual Project Teams
    Weimann, Peter
    Pollock, Michael
    Scott, Elsje
    Brown, Irwin
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION, 2013, 56 (04) : 332 - 353
  • [9] How Long Until We Are (Psychologically) Safe? A Longitudinal Investigation of Psychological Safety in Virtual Engineering Design Teams in Education
    Cole, Courtney
    O'Connell, Abigail
    Marhefka, Jacqueline
    Jablokow, Kathryn
    Mohammad, Susan
    Ritter, Sarah
    Miller, Scarlett
    [J]. DESIGN COMPUTING AND COGNITION'22, 2023, : 767 - 784
  • [10] How non-designers understand the architecture design project: a comparative study using immersive virtual reality.
    Serpa, Flavin
    Eloy, Sara
    [J]. INTERACTION DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURES, 2020, (45) : 287 - 301