Combating Scientific Disinformation on Gender-Affirming Care

被引:7
|
作者
McNamara, Meredithe [1 ,7 ]
Abdul-Latif, Hussein [2 ]
Boulware, Susan D. [1 ]
Kamody, Rebecca [3 ]
Kuper, Laura E. [4 ]
Olezeski, Christy L. [5 ]
Szilagyi, Nathalie [1 ]
Alstott, Anne [6 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Pediat, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Yale Child Study Ctr, Yale Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Childrens Hlth Syst Texas, Houston, TX USA
[5] Yale Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Yale Law Sch, New Haven, CT USA
[7] Yale Sch Med, Dept Pediat, 15 York St, New Haven, CT 06512 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1542/peds.2022-060943
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Scientific disinformation is false and misleading information that is used intentionally by legal and political actors to sway public opinion and oppose facts. In recent years, disinformation has become a tool for authorities to limit gender-affirming health care (GAC) for transgender and gender-expansive youth who experience gender dysphoria. Existing modes of expert intervention in health policy may not be sufficient to match the pace of these quickly unfolding health care bans. A cross-disciplinary team of academics in medicine, psychology, and law assembled to challenge scientific disinformation on GAC with 2 rapid-response rebuttal reports. Reports were produced in 3 to 10 weeks after the passage of GAC bans in Texas, Alabama, and Florida in 2022. They were posted online to facilitate dissemination and engage litigators, judges, policy experts, advocates, parents, and others. The team's efforts complemented public statements by medical societies and lawsuits brought by national LGBTQ litigators. The team's reports were cited in legal challenges to GAC bans in Texas, Alabama, and Florida. The team also filed amicus briefs for direct consideration by the courts and public comments to health care agencies in Florida. The reports received coverage in local and national media outlets in broadcast and print media. This advocacy case study describes the process used to challenge disinformation about GAC with rapid-response rebuttal reports, as well as the impact of this work and associated challenges. In an increasingly polarized political climate, this process may be adapted to other areas of health policy in which scientific disinformation takes root.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding and Addressing Disinformation in Gender-Affirming Health Care Bans
    Meade, Nicolas G.
    Lepore, Christina
    Olezeski, Christy L.
    McNamara, Meredithe
    TRANSGENDER HEALTH, 2024, 9 (04) : 281 - 287
  • [2] Seeking Gender-Affirming Care as a Future Gender-Affirming Surgeon
    Madzia, Jules
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2023, 98 (12) : 1451 - 1451
  • [3] Gender-affirming care
    McDonough, Mike
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2025,
  • [4] Gender-affirming primary care
    Cosio, Ingrid
    Goldman, Lauren
    MacKenzie, Megan
    Townsend, Marria
    BRITISH COLUMBIA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 64 (01): : 20 - 22
  • [5] Gender-affirming psychiatric care
    Tellier, Pierre-Paul
    CLINICAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 29 (04) : 1512 - 1513
  • [6] Gender-Affirming Care in Children
    DeZure, Chandani
    PEDIATRIC ANNALS, 2023, 52 (05): : E160 - E163
  • [7] Gender-Affirming Care & the Courts
    Cole, David
    NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS, 2024, 71 (20)
  • [8] Gender-affirming care is preventative care
    Restar, Arjee Javellana
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-AMERICAS, 2023, 24
  • [9] On Gender, Gender Incongruence, and Gender-Affirming Care
    Jelsma, Tony
    PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND CHRISTIAN FAITH, 2025, 77 (01):
  • [10] Bringing Gender-Affirming Care to Primary Care
    Mueller, Rebecca C.
    Desimone, M. Elayne
    NURSE EDUCATOR, 2023, 48 (06) : 304 - 309