EVALUATION OF SME RELATIONSHIPS FOR OPEN INNOVATION: PROPOSAL OF THE ARTIFACT ?INNOVATION NETWORK ASSESSMENT TOOL? (INAT)

被引:0
|
作者
Ceolin, Michelli Julhian Abegg [1 ,2 ]
Damke, Fernando [3 ]
Da Silva, Elizandra [4 ]
Bulhoes, Ronaldo [4 ]
Meneghatti, Marcelo Roger [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Project Management, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] State Univ Western Parana UNIOESTE Toledo, Parana, Brazil
[3] State Univ Western Parana UNIOESTE Iguazu Falls, Parana, Brazil
[4] State Univ Western Parana UNIOESTE Cascavel, Parana, Brazil
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION | 2023年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
open innovation; small and medium-sized enterprises; design science research; relationship network; PERFORMANCE; ANTECEDENTS; COMMERCIALIZATION; TRUST;
D O I
10.5585/2023.22374
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: This research aims to develop an artifact that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can use to assess their network of relationships and identify partners for open innovation projects. Methodology/approach: The Design Science Research (DSR) method was used to create the artifact, which is based on a theoretical model that incorporates three mechanisms for analyzing interorganizational relationships: richness, receptivity, and reach. Three tests were run on the artifact during development. Afterwards, an evaluative test was conducted with four companies to determine whether the developed artifact met its objective and had good operation and presentation.Originality/value: In the absence of similar tools addressing the same class of problem, a new artifact was proposed, allowing SME managers to analyze their relationships and plan new open innovation projects. Main results: According to preliminary evaluations, the artifact is adequate for understanding which partners can participate in an innovation project and how to channel resources, however, it needs to be supplemented with other tools that allow knowing the partners. Theoretical/methodological contributions: As the research's main contribution, we present an operational artifact that is functional and well received by managers and has the potential to be used as an auxiliary tool in open innovation projects developed by SMEs.Social/management contributions: As an implication for the field of open innovation in SMEs, we consider the identification of the problem and the proposal of an artifact as a relevant formulation for raising new hypotheses and developing subsequent artifacts.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Network Centrality and Open Innovation: A Social Network Analysis of an SME Manufacturing Cluster
    Woods, Judith
    Galbraith, Brendan
    Hewitt-Dundas, Nola
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (02) : 351 - 364
  • [2] Open innovation and SME performance: The roles of reverse knowledge sharing and stakeholder relationships
    Tsai, Fu-Sheng
    Cabrilo, Sladjana
    Chou, Hsin-Hui
    Hu, Feng
    Tang, Au Due
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 148 : 433 - 443
  • [3] A critical assessment of the evaluation of EU interventions for innovation in the SME sector in wales
    Edwards, Tim
    Delbridge, Rick
    Munday, Max
    [J]. URBAN STUDIES, 2007, 44 (12) : 2429 - 2447
  • [4] OPEN INNOVATION AND THE PROPENSITY TO INNOVATE AMONG SME IN POLAND
    Stanislawski, R.
    Szymanski, G.
    Fikhtner, O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF RUSSIA: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES, 2019, 59 : 17 - 24
  • [5] Conceptual Model of Green Innovation toward Knowledge Sharing and Open Innovation in Indonesian SME
    Rumanti, Augustina Asih
    Samadhi, T. M. A. Ari
    Wiratmadja, Iwan Inrawan
    Reynaldo, Rocky
    [J]. 2017 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA), 2017, : 182 - 186
  • [6] Assessment of SME's Independent Innovation Capability Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation
    Zhang Qingwei
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, PT 1, 2009, : 237 - 241
  • [7] Innovation Types and Network Relationships
    Partanen, Jukka
    Chetty, Sylvie K.
    Rajala, Arto
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2014, 38 (05) : 1027 - 1055
  • [8] Open innovation, network embeddedness and incremental innovation capability
    Han, Shaojie
    Lyu, Yibo
    Ji, Ruonan
    Zhu, Yuqing
    Su, Jingqin
    Bao, Lining
    [J]. MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2020, 58 (12) : 2655 - 2680
  • [9] Ready For Open Innovation or not? An Open Innovation Readiness Assessment Model (OIRAM)
    Waiyawuththanapoom, Naphunsakorn
    Isckia, Thierry
    Danesghar, Farhad
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING (ICICKM-2013), 2013, : 465 - 472
  • [10] Network Analysis of Open Innovation
    Yun, JinHyo Joseph
    Jeong, EuiSeob
    Park, JinSeu
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (08)