Cost-benefit analysis of emission reduction techniques: a case for container vessel

被引:0
|
作者
Ejder, Emir [1 ]
Karatug, Caglar [1 ]
Arslanoglu, Yasin [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Maritime Fac, TR-34940 Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
关键词
Ammonia; LNG; emission reduction; scrubber; SCR; cost-benefit analysis; ECA REGULATIONS; TECHNOLOGIES; FUEL; SOX; DIESEL; PERFORMANCE; SELECTION; NOX;
D O I
10.1080/20464177.2024.2317511
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
One of the most important issues in the maritime industry is controlling and reducing the amount of emissions caused by marine vessels. In this respect, the International Maritime Organization sets some air pollution-related regulations and encourages maritime companies to utilise current and innovative emission abatement methods on their ships. The application of these approaches to ships not only provides environmental benefits but also creates additional financial costs for the company. In this study, operational data of a container ship has been acquired and examined. Methods such as ammonia, LNG, scrubber, low sulphur fuel use, and selective catalytic reduction have been considered to determine the most appropriate emission reduction approach. Nine different scenarios have been created with the use of stated methods and each scenario is analysed both environmentally and economically and compared to each other. Finally, the most suitable scenario has been determined by calculating the payback period of each investment. Since there is a relatively longer period of redemption, using a dual-fuel engine could be more suitable for long-lasting and newly built ships. For the currently cruising ships, the use of scrubber systems with selective catalytic reduction is an effective solution to reduce the number of emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 269
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-benefit analysis and emission reduction of lighting retrofits in residential sector
    Mahlia, TMI
    Said, MFM
    Masjuki, HH
    Tamjis, MR
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2005, 37 (06) : 573 - 578
  • [2] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR VESSEL TRAFFIC SYSTEMS.
    Hans, M.Wm.
    [J]. 1976, : 57 - 74
  • [3] Comparison of hysterectomy techniques and cost-benefit analysis
    Garry, R
    [J]. BAILLIERES CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 11 (01): : 137 - 148
  • [4] The cost-benefit model for secure container network
    Scholz-Reiter, Bernd
    Haasis, Hans-Dietrich
    Daschkovska, Kateryna
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, 2012, 4 (02) : 157 - 171
  • [5] Cost-Benefit Analysis and Emission Reduction of Energy Efficient Lighting at the Universiti Tenaga Nasional
    Ganandran, G. S. B.
    Mahlia, T. M. I.
    Ong, Hwai Chyuan
    Rismanchi, B.
    Chong, W. T.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2014,
  • [6] Cost-benefit analysis of software development techniques and practices
    Erdogmus, Hakan
    [J]. 29th International Conference on Software Engineering: ICSE 2007 Companion Volume, Proceedings, 2007, : 178 - 179
  • [7] COST-BENEFIT TECHNIQUES AND CONSUMER SURPLUS - CLARIFICATORY ANALYSIS
    REAUME, DM
    [J]. PUBLIC FINANCE-FINANCES PUBLIQUES, 1973, 28 (02): : 196 - 211
  • [8] The importance of cost-benefit analysis of crime reduction programmes
    Farrington, David P.
    Welsh, Brandon C.
    [J]. CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR AND MENTAL HEALTH, 2023, 33 (02) : 87 - 91
  • [9] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BJORNSTAD, P
    [J]. KJEMI, 1975, 35 (10): : 3 - 3
  • [10] Cost-benefit analysis
    Miura, Grant
    [J]. NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (10) : 903 - 903