A National Survey on the Awareness of Artificial Intelligence Technologies Among Radiation Oncologists- Turkish Society of Radiation Oncology Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology Group Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kirakli, Esra K. O. R. K. M. A. Z. [1 ,6 ]
Gursel, Sukriye Bilge [2 ]
Erkal, Eda Y. I. R. M. I. B. E. S. O. G. L. U. [3 ]
Etiz, Durmus [4 ]
Ozyar, Enis [5 ]
机构
[1] Dr Suat Seren Chest Dis & Surg Training & Res Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Samsun, Turkiye
[3] Kocaeli Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kocaeli, Turkiye
[4] Eskisehir Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Eskisehir, Turkiye
[5] Acibadem Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[6] Dr Suat Seren Gogus Hastaliklari & Cerrahisi Egiti, Radyasyon Onkol Klin, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
Artificial intelligence; radiation oncology; radiotherapy; survey;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE We aimed to investigate the perception of radiation oncologists about artificial intelligence (AI), their current use of AI in clinical practice, and their expectations, concerns, and wishes in terms of the future of radiation oncology (RO) in the era of AI.METHODS An electronic survey was created.RESULTS A total of 108 radiation oncologists participated. One-fourth (24.3%) rated their knowledge of AI as very poor. The majority (94%) reported that they need training about AI. Most respondents (62.6%) indicated that they had never used any AI application. Nearly 90% reported that the introduction of AI would improve RO. Image analysis and target definition were identified as key benefits of AI in RO by 84% of respondents. The medical liability due to machine error and black box uncertainties was the greatest concerns. The need for clinical validation of AI applications, development of ethical frameworks, and medicolegal guidelines was identified as priorities before the implementation of AI in RO by 86%, 78%, and 68%, respectively.CONCLUSION There was a big gap in knowledge within our RO community. The enthusiasm to learn was high. AI applications have not been imposed much in clinical routine. Mostly, the participants felt optimistic about the introduction of AI. The top areas where AI was thought to be most useful in RO were reliant on imaging. The respondents were mostly concerned about the medical liability.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] A National Survey on the Awareness of Artificial Intelligence Technologies Among Radiation Oncologists-Turkish Society of Radiation Oncology Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology Group Study
    Korkmaz Kirakli, Esra
    Gursel, Sukriye Bilge
    Yirmibesoglu Erkal, Eda
    Etiz, Durmus
    Ozyar, Enis
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 38 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [2] Perceptions of Canadian radiation oncologists, radiation physicists, radiation therapists and radiation trainees about the impact of artificial intelligence in radiation oncology - national survey
    Wong, Kristen
    Gallant, Francois
    Szumacher, Ewa
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2021, 52 (01) : 44 - 48
  • [3] RE: Perceptions of Canadian radiation oncologists, radiation physicists, radiation therapists and radiation trainees about the impact of artificial intelligence in radiation oncology - National survey
    Tay, Yi Xiang
    Chong, Letty
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2021, 52 (02) : 316 - 317
  • [4] A survey of clinicians on the use of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology, dermatology, radiology and radiation oncology
    Scheetz, Jane
    Rothschild, Philip
    McGuinness, Myra
    Hadoux, Xavier
    Soyer, H. Peter
    Janda, Monika
    Condon, James J. J.
    Oakden-Rayner, Luke
    Palmer, Lyle J.
    Keel, Stuart
    van Wijngaarden, Peter
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [5] A survey of clinicians on the use of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology, dermatology, radiology and radiation oncology
    Jane Scheetz
    Philip Rothschild
    Myra McGuinness
    Xavier Hadoux
    H. Peter Soyer
    Monika Janda
    James J.J. Condon
    Luke Oakden-Rayner
    Lyle J. Palmer
    Stuart Keel
    Peter van Wijngaarden
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [6] Current Use and Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Oncology: A Statewide Consortium Survey
    Tanweer, A.
    Dykstra, M. P.
    Hallstrom, A.
    Mietzel, M.
    Evans, J. R., Jr.
    Miller, S. R.
    Regan, S. N.
    Merkel, S.
    Jolly, S.
    Matuszak, M. M.
    Pierce, L. J.
    Dess, R. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2024, 120 (02): : E658 - E658
  • [7] Radiation Oncologists' Perceptions of Adopting an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Contouring Technology: Model Development and Questionnaire Study
    Zhai, Huiwen
    Yang, Xin
    Xue, Jiaolong
    Lavender, Christopher
    Ye, Tiantian
    Li, Ji-Bin
    Xu, Lanyang
    Lin, Li
    Cao, Weiwei
    Sun, Ying
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (09)
  • [8] National Cancer Institute Workshop on Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Oncology: Training the Next Generation
    Kang, John
    Thompson, Reid F.
    Aneja, Sanjay
    Lehman, Constance
    Trister, Andrew
    Zou, James
    Obcemea, Ceferino
    El Naqa, Issam
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11 (01) : 74 - 83
  • [9] Radiation Oncologists' Approach to Rectosigmoid Junction Tumors in Turkey: The Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology Gastrointestinal Group Survey Study (TROD 02-007)
    Aynaci, Ozlem
    Serdar, Lasif
    Canyilmaz, Emine
    Hurmuz, Pervin
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 34 (09): : 911 - 917
  • [10] Awareness and Attitude Toward Artificial Intelligence Among Medical Students and Pathology Trainees: Survey Study
    Rjoop, Anwar
    Al-Qudah, Mohammad
    Alkhasawneh, Raja
    Bataineh, Nesreen
    Abdaljaleel, Maram
    Rjoub, Moayad A.
    Alkhateeb, Mustafa
    Abdelraheem, Mohammad
    Al-Omari, Salem
    Bani-Mari, Omar
    Alkabalan, Anas
    Altulaih, Saoud
    Rjoub, Iyad
    Alshimi, Rula
    JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2025, 11