What works in peer support for breast cancer survivors: A qualitative systematic review and meta-ethnography

被引:1
|
作者
Clougher, Derek [1 ,2 ]
Ciria-Suarez, Laura [1 ,3 ]
Medina, Joan C. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Anastasiadou, Dimitra [6 ]
Racioppi, Anna [3 ]
Ochoa-Arnedo, Cristian [1 ,3 ,5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Inst Catala dOncol, Ehlth ICOnnectat & Psychooncol Serv, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Bipolar & Depress Disorders Unit, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Inst Invest Biomed Bellvitge IDIBELL, Psychooncol & Digital Hlth Grp, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Oberta Catalunya, Dept Psychol & Educ Sci, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Univ Barcelona, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychobiol, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Hosp Duran & Reynals, ICOnnectat Hlth Program, Avinguda Granvia del Hosp 199 203, Barcelona 08908, Spain
关键词
breast cancer; meta-ethnography; oncology; peer support; systematic review; OF-LIFE; WOMEN; EXPERIENCES; PROGRAM; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/aphw.12473
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is associated with adverse physical and psychological consequences. Although research has identified the various benefits linked to psychosocial interventions, mixed results have been found in relation to peer support. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-ethnography is to explore the qualitative evidence on the experience of breast cancer survivors in peer support. A systematic search of the literature was conducted until June 2023, and a meta-ethnographic approach was used to synthesize the included papers. Eleven articles were included, collecting the experience of 345 participants. The following four core areas involved in peer support implementation were identified from the synthesis: Peer support can create understanding and a mutual therapeutic and emotional connection; peer support can facilitate an educational and supportive patient-centered journey; peer support should monitor group members for unpleasant emotional experiences; peer support should have professional supervision of recruitment and training to prioritize quality. These results can be used as patient-centered insights by healthcare professionals to provide evidence-informed peer support programs and address current limitations in the field.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 815
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What is walking? a systematic review and meta-ethnography
    Delgado Ortiz, L.
    Polhemus, A.
    Keogh, A.
    Sutton, N.
    Remmele, W.
    Hansen, C.
    Kluge, F.
    Sharrack, B.
    Becker, C.
    Troosters, T.
    Maetzler, W.
    Rochester, L.
    Frei, A.
    Puhan, M.
    Garcia-Aymerich, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [2] Autism Disparities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography of Qualitative Research
    Singh, Jennifer S.
    Bunyak, Garrett
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2019, 29 (06) : 796 - 808
  • [3] What's Wrong With Meta-Ethnography Reporting? A Systematic Review to Inform Meta-Ethnography Reporting Guidelines
    France, Emma
    Ring, Nicola
    Noyes, Jane
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2016, 15 (01):
  • [4] A systematic review and meta-ethnography of the qualitative literature: experiences of the menarche
    Chang, Yu-Ting
    Hayter, Mark
    Wu, Shu-Chen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2010, 19 (3-4) : 447 - 460
  • [5] A qualitative systematic review of patients' experience of osteoporosis using meta-ethnography
    Barker, K. L.
    Toye, F.
    Lowe, C. J. Minns
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2016, 11 (01)
  • [6] A qualitative systematic review of patients’ experience of osteoporosis using meta-ethnography
    K. L. Barker
    F. Toye
    C. J. Minns Lowe
    [J]. Archives of Osteoporosis, 2016, 11
  • [7] Employment and breast cancer: a meta-ethnography
    Banning, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2011, 20 (06) : 708 - 719
  • [8] A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting
    Emma F France
    Nicola Ring
    Rebecca Thomas
    Jane Noyes
    Margaret Maxwell
    Ruth Jepson
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14
  • [9] A methodological systematic review of what's wrong with meta-ethnography reporting
    France, Emma F.
    Ring, Nicola
    Thomas, Rebecca
    Noyes, Jane
    Maxwell, Margaret
    Jepson, Ruth
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [10] Negotiating support for patients: A meta-ethnography of families facing breast cancer
    Ginter, Amanda
    DeStefano, Elissa
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 28 : 58 - 58