The bigger the better? Investigating the effects of driving simulator fidelity on driving behavior and perception

被引:2
|
作者
Himmels, Chantal [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Venrooij, Joost [1 ]
Parduzi, Arben [1 ]
Peller, Martin [1 ]
Riener, Andreas [2 ]
机构
[1] BMW Grp, Munich, Germany
[2] TH Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany
[3] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Linz, Austria
[4] BMW Grp Res, New Technol Innovat, D-80788 Munich, Germany
关键词
Driving simulators; Simulator fidelity; Driving simulator validity; Simulator sickness; Presence; Real-world replicability; FIELD-OF-VIEW; MOTION SICKNESS; VALIDATION; REAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.trf.2024.01.007
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
There is a wide range of different driving simulator systems, which vary greatly in terms of cost as well as system characteristics. Higher fidelity simulators are often assumed to produce more valid results. While there are many studies that have compared simulator driving to real -world driving, to date there has been no large study comparing different simulator systems to each other and to real -world driving. Aiming at closing this gap, the present research offers an extensive comparison of six different driving simulators with the results of a previous real -world study. In terms of absolute validity, most of the simulators provided good results for distance to a vehicle in front and standard deviation of the lateral position, whereas the results for driving speed were inconsistent. Simulator fidelity appears to positively affect distance perception, although differences between higher fidelity simulators were generally small, and no real -world comparison data were available here. With respect to simulator sickness, a clear advantage of using a high fidelity simulator was found, while the effect size depended on the use case. In summary, the results suggest that different simulators are suitable for different use cases to different degrees, and the differences between simulators are not always related to higher simulator fidelity. The presented study can serve as a basis for understanding simulator requirements associated with different use cases.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 266
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of Driving Simulator Fidelity on the Driving Behavior of Emergency Braking
    Tu, H.
    Zhang, K.
    Liu, H.
    Sun, L.
    NEW FRONTIERS IN ROAD AND AIRPORT ENGINEERING, 2015, : 296 - 307
  • [2] Driving Simulator Fidelity and Emergency Driving Behavior
    Tu, Huizhao
    Li, Zhenfei
    Li, Hao
    Zhang, Ke
    Sun, Lijun
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2015, (2518) : 113 - 121
  • [3] Investigating the perception of powertrain shuffle with a longitudinal dynamic driving simulator
    Erler, Philipp
    Menig, Angela
    Uphaus, Frank
    Makosi, Christoph Andr Malonga
    Rinderknecht, Stephan
    Vogt, Joachim
    2018 IEEE/ASME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENT MECHATRONICS (AIM), 2018, : 1427 - 1431
  • [4] Perception of sleepiness in a driving simulator is better than perception in the maintenance of wakefulness test
    Schreier, D.
    Roth, C.
    Mathis, J.
    JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, 2014, 23 : 32 - 32
  • [5] Distance perception in a driving simulator
    Fluckiger, M
    Baumberger, B
    Paquette, M
    Bergeron, J
    Delorme, A
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 : U659 - U659
  • [6] LGSVL Simulator: A High Fidelity Simulator for Autonomous Driving
    Rong, Guodong
    Shin, Byung Hyun
    Tabatabaee, Hadi
    Lu, Qiang
    Lemke, Steve
    Mozeiko, Martins
    Boise, Eric
    Uhm, Geehoon
    Gerow, Mark
    Mehta, Shalin
    Agafonov, Eugene
    Kim, Tae Hyung
    Sterner, Eric
    Ushiroda, Keunhae
    Reyes, Michael
    Zelenkovsky, Dmitry
    Kim, Seonman
    2020 IEEE 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2020,
  • [7] Investigating "Texting while Driving" Behavior at Different Roadway Configurations Using a Driving Simulator Setting
    Al Aufi, Ayuob
    Schmidt, Cole
    Goetz, Jackson
    Haleem, Kirolos
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2022, 2676 (03) : 183 - 200
  • [8] Driving simulator validation with hazard perception
    Underwood, Geoffrey
    Crundall, David
    Chapman, Peter
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2011, 14 (06) : 435 - 446
  • [9] Driving Simulator Validity of Driving Behavior in Work Zones
    Zhang, Yanning
    Guo, Zhongyin
    Sun, Zhi
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2020, 2020
  • [10] Perception of relative distance in a driving simulator
    Baumberger, B
    Flückiger, M
    Paquette, M
    Bergeron, J
    Delorme, A
    JAPANESE PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 47 (03) : 230 - 237