Utility of Open-Access Long-Term Precipitation Data Products for Correcting Climate Model Projection in South China

Insufficient precipitation observations hinder the bias-correction of Global Climate Model (GCM) precipitation outputs in ungauged and remote areas. As a result, the reliability of future precipitation and water resource projections is restricted for these areas. Open-access quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) products offer a potential solution to this challenge. This study assesses the effectiveness of three widely used, long-term QPEs, including ERA5, PERSIANN-CDR, and CHIRPS, in bias-correcting precipitation outputs from the CMIP6 GCMs. The evaluation involves the reproduction of precipitation distribution, streamflow simulation utility based on a hydrological model, and the accuracy of extreme indices associated with rainstorm/flood/drought events. This study selects the Beijiang basin located in the subtropical monsoon area of South China as the case study area. The results demonstrate that bias-correction using QPEs improves the performance of GCM precipitation outputs in reproducing precipitation/streamflow distribution and extreme indices, with a few exceptions. PCDR generally exhibits the most effective bias-correction utility, consistently delivering reasonable performance across various cases, making it a suitable alternative to gauge data for bias-correction in ungauged areas. However, GCM outputs corrected by ERA5 tend to overestimate overall precipitation and streamflow (by up to about 25% to 30%), while the correction results of CHIRPS significantly overestimate certain extreme indices (by up to about 50% to 100%). Based on the revealed performance of QPEs in correcting GCM outputs, this study provides references for selecting QPEs in GCM-based water resource projections in remote and ungauged areas.