共 4 条
Moving from the clinic to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic - a pilot clinical trial comparing in-clinic rehabilitation versus telerehabilitation for persisting symptoms following a mild Traumatic brain injury
被引:0
|作者:
Langevin, Pierre
[1
,2
,3
]
Fremont, Pierre
[2
]
Fait, Philippe
[1
,3
,4
,5
]
Dube, Marc-Olivier
[1
,2
,3
]
Roy, Jean-Sebastien
[2
,3
,6
]
机构:
[1] Clin Cortex & Physio Interact, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Dept Rehabil, Pavillon Ferdinand Vandry, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Quebec Rehabil Inst CIRRIS, Ctr Interdisciplinary Res Rehabil & Social Integra, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Dept Human Kinet, Trois Rivieres, PQ, Canada
[5] Res Ctr Neuropsychol & Cognit CERNEC, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Quebec Rehabil Inst, Ctr interdisciplinary Res Rehabil & Social integra, 525 Blvd Wilfrid hamel, Quebec City, PQ G1M 2S8, Canada
关键词:
Persisting post-concussive symptoms;
telerehabilitation;
neck pain;
dizziness;
headache;
SPORTS-RELATED CONCUSSION;
HOME TELEREHABILITATION;
HIGH-SCHOOL;
RELIABILITY;
DYSFUNCTION;
SYSTEM;
D O I:
10.1080/09638288.2023.2236016
中图分类号:
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号:
100215 ;
摘要:
PurposeThe objective of this study was to compare the effects of an in-clinic cervicovestibular rehabilitation program (education, home exercises, manual techniques, sub-symptom threshold aerobic exercise [STAE] program) to a similar program (education, home-exercises, STAE program), but without manual techniques, provided in a telerehabilitation format in adults with persisting post-concussion symptoms (PCS).Materials and methods designIn this parallel-group non-randomized clinical trial, 41 adults with persisting PCS were allocated to the in-clinic (n = 30) or telerehabilitation (n = 11) program. The outcome measures, which included the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS; primary outcome), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for neck pain and headache and three disability questionnaires, were collected at baseline, weeks 6, 12, and 26. Non-parametric analysis for longitudinal data (NparLD) was used.ResultsFor the PCSS, there was a group-by-time interaction (p = 0.05) with significant between-group differences at week 6, 12, and 26 (p < 0.05) for the in-clinic group. There were also group-by-time interactions for NPRS neck pain and headache (p < 0.05) for the in-clinic group.ConclusionThe study suggests that a telehealth format failed to reach the efficiency of an in-clinic rehabilitation program in terms of symptoms reduction and functional improvement. These results must be interpreted with caution given the limited number of participants. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03677661.IMPLICATION FOR REHABILITATIONThe telerehabilitation format for adults with persisting post-concussion symptoms was widely implemented in the COVID-19 pandemic without any evidence of efficacy over the more traditional in-clinic rehabilitation format.The study suggests that a telerehabilitation format failed to reach the efficiency of an in-clinic rehabilitation program in terms of symptoms reduction and functional improvement.Clinicians should try to incorporate some in-clinic appointments when a telerehabilitation format is required such as for patients in underserved area.
引用
收藏
页码:2880 / 2889
页数:10
相关论文