Soil erodibility for water and wind erosion and its relationship to vegetation and soil properties in China's drylands

被引:13
|
作者
Han, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Wenwu [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Ding, Jingyi [1 ,2 ]
Ferreira, Carla Sofia Santos [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Inst Land Surface Syst & Sustainable Dev, Fac Geog Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Stockholm Univ, Dept Phys Geog, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Stockholm Univ, Bolin Ctr Climate Res, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Polytech Inst Coimbra, Res Ctr Nat Resources Environm & Soc CERNAS, Coimbra Agrarian Tech Sch, Coimbra, Portugal
[6] Beijing Normal Univ, Inst Land Surface Syst & Sustainable Dev, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, 19 XinJieKouWai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Soil erodibility; Water erosion; Wind erosion; Dryland; Ecological restoration; LOESS PLATEAU; MOISTURE-CONTENT; ORGANIC-MATTER; NITROGEN; CARBON; TRANSPORT; SEDIMENT; TEXTURE; STRESS; RUNOFF;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166639
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Drylands with fragile socio-ecological systems are vulnerable to soil erosion. China's drylands face the dual threat of water (WAE) and wind erosion (WIE). To mitigate soil erosion in drylands, China has implemented numerous ecological restoration measures. However, whether vegetation and soil have different effects on soil erodibility for water erosion (soil erodibility, K) and wind erosion (soil erodible fraction, EF) in drylands is unclear, hindering decision makers to develop suitable ecological restoration strategies. Here, we conducted a large-scale belt transect survey to explore the spatial variation of K and EF in China's drylands, and examined the linear and nolinear effects of aridity (aridity index), vegetation (fractional vegetation cover and below-ground biomass), and soil properties (bulk density, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus) on K and EF. The results showed in China's drylands that the K ranges from 0.02 to 0.07, with high values recorded in the northern Loess Plateau and the eastern Inner Mongolia Plateau. The EF ranges from 0.26 to 0.98, and shows longitudinal zonation with higher values in the east and lower values in the west. Aridity has a negative linear effect on K and an inverse U-shaped nonlinear effect on EF. Aridity can affect K and EF by suppressing vegetation growth and disrupting soil properties. However, K and EF had different responses to some vegetation and soil variables. K and EF had opposite relationships with soil bulk density, and EF was significantly affected by fractional vegetation cover, while K was not. Overall, the effects of aridity and soil properties on soil erodibility were more pronounced than those from vegetation, whose effect on soil erodibility was limited. This study provides relevant information to support reducing soil water and wind erosion by highlighting the hotspot areas of soil erodibility, relevant for implementing vegetation restoration and soil conservation measures in drylands.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A review of soil erodibility in water and wind erosion research
    SONG Yang
    Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster
    [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2005, (02) : 167 - 176
  • [2] A review of soil erodibility in water and wind erosion research
    Yang Song
    Lianyou Liu
    Ping Yan
    Tong Cao
    [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2005, 15 (2) : 167 - 176
  • [3] Relationship between Soil Erodibility and Soil Properties
    Shafii, Iman
    Medina-Cetina, Zenon
    Shidlovskaya, Anna
    Briaud, Jean-Louis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 149 (01)
  • [4] Soil erodibility and processes of water erosion on hillslope
    Bryan, RB
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2000, 32 (3-4) : 385 - 415
  • [5] Soil erodibility dynamics and its representation for wind erosion and dust emission models
    Webb, Nicholas P.
    Strong, Craig L.
    [J]. AEOLIAN RESEARCH, 2011, 3 (02) : 165 - 179
  • [6] AERODYNAMICS OF A PORTABLE WIND EROSION TUNNEL FOR MEASURING SOIL ERODIBILITY BY WIND
    RAUPACH, MR
    LEYS, JF
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1990, 28 (02): : 177 - 191
  • [7] Effects of Vegetation Restoration on Soil Physical Properties in the Wind-Water Erosion Region of the Northern Loess Plateau of China
    Wang Li
    Mu Yan
    Zhang Qingfeng
    Jia Zhikaun
    [J]. CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2012, 40 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [8] Soil erodibility for water erosion: A perspective and Chinese experiences
    Wang, Bin
    Zheng, Fenli
    Roemkens, Mathias J. M.
    Darboux, Frederic
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2013, 187 : 1 - 10
  • [9] Soil erodibility and hillslope erosion processes affected by vegetation restoration duration
    Liu, Ya
    Liu, Gang
    Gu, Ju
    Shi, Hongqiang
    Li, Hairu
    Han, Yuqian
    Liu, Dandan
    Xia, Xiaolin
    Guo, Zhen
    [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2025, 245
  • [10] RELATION OF SOIL PROPERTIES TO ITS ERODIBILITY
    WISCHMEIER, WH
    MANNERING, JV
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS, 1969, 33 (01): : 131 - +