Optimizing bioethanol production from cassava peels through agitation timing variation in separate hydrolysis and co-fermentation

被引:1
|
作者
Sokan-Adeaga, Adewale Allen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ana, Godson R. E. E. [2 ]
Olorunnisola, Abel Olajide [4 ]
Hoseinzadeh, Edris [5 ]
机构
[1] Lead City Univ, Coll Med, Fac Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Ibadan, Nigeria
[2] Univ Ibadan, Coll Med, Fac Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Ibadan, Nigeria
[3] Ajayi Crowther Univ, Fac Basic Med Sci, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Oyo, Nigeria
[4] Univ Ibadan, Fac Technol, Dept Wood Prod Engn, Ibadan, Nigeria
[5] Saveh Univ Med Sci, Incubat & Innovat Ctr, Saveh, Iran
关键词
Ethanol; Fermentation; Hydrolysis; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Sugars; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; YEAST; BIOMASS; HYBRID; ENERGY; SUGARS; PULP;
D O I
10.34172/EHEM.2023.42
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: This study assessed the effect of various agitation timings on bioethanol production from cassava peels (CP) using separate hydrolysis and co-fermentation (SHCF) technique.<br />Methods: The milled CP was divided into three groups each of 20 g and subjected to two-stage hydrolysis carried out at 100 oC for 60 min and 50 minutes, respectively. Experimental layouts were Sample 1 (B1) [0 hours i.e., no shaking], Sample 2 (B2) [3 hours shaking with an electric shaker at 200 rev/min-1], and Sample 3 (B3) [6 hours shaking at 200 rev/min-1]. Fermentations were carried out at 30 oC for 72 days. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and New Duncan's multiple range test at P = 0.05.<br />Results: The TSS and pH readings of the treatment groups before and after fermentation were: B1 - TSS (27.15 +/- 0.15, 17.25 +/- 0.07 oBx), pH (5.50 +/- 0.00, 4.53 +/- 0.04); B2 - TSS (27.32 +/- 0.08, 14.78 +/- 0.12 oBx), pH (5.50 +/- 0.00, 4.74 +/- 0.06); and B3 - TSS (27.17 +/- 0.07, 10.24 +/- 0.08 oBx), pH (5.50 +/- 0.00, 4.77 +/- 0.05) (P < 0.05). The mean fermentation efficiency (FE) and ethanol productivity (EP) were B1 (15.17 +/- 0.07%, 0.122 +/- 0.001 gL-1h-1), B2 (15.70 +/- 0.18%, 0.126 +/- 0.002 gL-1h-1), and B3 (18.80 +/- 0.14%, 0.151 +/- 0.001 gL-1h-1) (P < 0.05). All treatment groups attained the maximum ethanol yields at 72 hours of fermentation (P < 0.05). Agitation at 200 rev/min-1 for 6 hours gave the optimal FE (%), EP, and ethanol yield.<br />Conclusion: The established condition improved the Bioethanol quality and yield of CP. Thus, optimizing bioethanol production from CP would help enhance sustainable biofuel production without affecting food security.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 400
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] From wheat straw to bioethanol: integrative analysis of a separate hydrolysis and co-fermentation process with implemented enzyme production
    Vera Novy
    Karin Longus
    Bernd Nidetzky
    [J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 8
  • [2] From wheat straw to bioethanol: integrative analysis of a separate hydrolysis and co-fermentation process with implemented enzyme production
    Novy, Vera
    Longus, Karin
    Nidetzky, Bernd
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2015, 8
  • [3] Enhanced Bioethanol Production from Waste Paper Through Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation
    Neelamegam Annamalai
    Huda Al Battashi
    S. Nair Anu
    Ahlam Al Azkawi
    Saif Al Bahry
    Nallusamy Sivakumar
    [J]. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2020, 11 : 121 - 131
  • [4] Enhanced Bioethanol Production from Waste Paper Through Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation
    Annamalai, Neelamegam
    Al Battashi, Huda
    Anu, S. Nair
    Al Azkawi, Ahlam
    Al Bahry, Saif
    Sivakumar, Nallusamy
    [J]. WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2020, 11 (01) : 121 - 131
  • [5] Bioethanol Production By Utilizing Cassava Peels Waste Through Enzymatic And Microbiological Hydrolysis
    Witantri, R. G.
    Purwoko, T.
    Sunarto
    Mahajoeno, E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN AND RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES (ICGRER 2016), 2017, 75
  • [6] Bioethanol production through separate hydrolysis and fermentation of Parthenium hysterophorus biomass
    Tavva, S. S. Mohan Dev
    Deshpande, Amol
    Durbha, Sanjeeva Rao
    Palakollu, V. Arjuna Rao
    Goparaju, A. Uttam
    Yechuri, V. Rao
    Bandaru, V. Rao
    Muktinutalapati, V. Subba Rao
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 86 : 1317 - 1323
  • [7] Bioethanol Production from Soybean Residue via Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation
    Trung Hau Nguyen
    Chae Hun Ra
    In Yung Sunwoo
    Pailin Sukwong
    Gwi-Taek Jeong
    Sung-Koo Kim
    [J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2018, 184 : 513 - 523
  • [8] Bioethanol Production from Soybean Residue via Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation
    Trung Hau Nguyen
    Ra, Chae Hun
    Sunwoo, In Yung
    Sukwong, Pailin
    Jeong, Gwi-Taek
    Kim, Sung-Koo
    [J]. APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 184 (02) : 513 - 523
  • [9] Effect of pH fermentation on production bioethanol from jackfruit seeds (Artocarpus heterophyllus) through separate fermentation hydrolysis method
    Arif, A. R.
    Natsir, H.
    Rohani, H.
    Karim, A.
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE (ICOS), 2018, 979
  • [10] Bioethanol production from acid pretreated water hyacinth by separate hydrolysis and fermentation
    Satyanagalakshmi, Karri
    Sindhu, Raveendran
    Binod, Parameswaran
    Janu, Kanakambaran Usha
    Sukumaran, Rajeev K.
    Pandey, Ashok
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, 2011, 70 (02): : 156 - 161