Factors Explaining Program Sustainability: A Study of the Implementation of a Social Services Program in Sweden

被引:0
|
作者
ahlfeldt, Emanuel [1 ]
Isaksson, David [1 ]
Winblad, Ulrika [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, Hlth Serv Res, Box 564, S-75122 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTION; HEALTH-PROGRAMS; PUBLIC-HEALTH; INNOVATIONS; DIRECTIONS; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1155/2023/1458305
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Even for successfully implemented programs, there is a great risk that new work practices are not sustained over time. Previous research has yielded a number of factors which influence program sustainability, but little is known about which factors are most important in different contexts or how these factors interact. This study tests a model of sustainability factors in a case where a program for structured needs assessment and documentation was implemented in the Swedish social services. In November 2020, a questionnaire was sent out to local implementing actors in the municipalities. The data include 135 municipal organizations with 1-3 respondents per organization. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression were used in the analysis. The outcome variable was routinization as one of the most central components of sustainability. The findings show that while the program was implemented at 21.5% of sites, it was both implemented and routinized at only 13.3% of sites. A key factor for successful routinization was an open project strategy, which entails coordination between the implementation process and other change initiatives, the identification of a long-term planning horizon, and development based on continuous feedback. Additional factors found to contribute to routinization were management commitment, user participation, first-line manager commitment, and available resources. Certain factors were identified as pertinent to the implementing actors themselves, such as effective project leadership and rationally planned projects. These latter factors, however, demonstrated less importance towards routinization. These findings are discussed in relation to the fragmented context of the implementation, whereby the recipient organizations were not single, unified organizations, but rather organizational clusters involving both purchaser and provider organizations. The findings have implications for the planning, management, and evaluation of social program implementation and the ability to sustain novel work practices.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ATTRIBUTES OF HEALTH SERVICES AS FACTORS IN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
    KALUZNY, AD
    VENEY, JE
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1973, 14 (02) : 124 - 133
  • [3] IMPLEMENTATION AND SUSTAINABILITY OF A JURISDICTIONAL DCD PROGRAM
    Elizabeth, Treasure
    David, Pilcher
    Helen, Opdam
    Victoria, Dale
    IMMUNOLOGY AND CELL BIOLOGY, 2012, 90 (08): : A13 - A13
  • [4] How to Design a Program for the Poor that is Not a Poor Program: Explaining the Political Sustainability of the Guaranteed Income
    Beland, Daniel
    Marier, Patrik
    OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL, 2024, 61 (02):
  • [5] Old Age in Sweden: A Program of Social Security
    Witte, Edwin E.
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1942, 50 (04) : 609 - 611
  • [6] OLD AGE IN SWEDEN: A PROGRAM OF SOCIAL SECURITY
    Smith, William C.
    SOCIAL FORCES, 1941, 20 (01) : 132 - 132
  • [7] Old age in Sweden: a program of social security
    Lester, Richard A.
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1941, 31 (01): : 193 - 193
  • [8] Racialized environments and syringe services program implementation: County-level factors
    Bluthenthal, Ricky N.
    Humphrey, Jamie L.
    Strack, Claire N.
    Wenger, Lynn D.
    Lakosky, Paul
    Patel, Sheila, V
    Kral, Alex H.
    Lambdin, Barrot
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2024, 263
  • [9] Social Network Analysis for Program Implementation
    Valente, Thomas W.
    Palinkas, Lawrence A.
    Czaja, Sara
    Chu, Kar-Hai
    Brown, C. Hendricks
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [10] ORGANIZATIONAL MODELS OF SOCIAL PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
    ELMORE, RF
    PUBLIC POLICY, 1978, 26 (02): : 185 - 228