Distinguishing mesorectal tumor deposits from metastatic lymph nodes by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Xu, Qiaoyu [1 ]
Xu, Yanyan [2 ]
Wang, Juan [2 ]
Sun, Hongliang [2 ]
Lin, Jie [3 ]
Xie, Sheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chao Yang Hosp, Dept Radiol, 8 Gong Ti South Rd, Beijing 100020, Peoples R China
[2] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Radiol, 2 Yinghua East St, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Pathol, 2 Yinghua East St, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Rectal cancer; Tumor deposits; Perfusion; Diffusion; DCE-MRI; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PARAMETERS; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-022-09328-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aimed to identify whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameters are helpful in distinguishing mesorectal tumor deposits (TD) from metastatic lymph nodes (MLN) in rectal cancer (RC). Methods Thirty patients (59 lesions, including 30 TD and 29 MLN) with RC who underwent pretreatment-MRI between February 2016 and August 2018 were enrolled. The morphological features, ADC values, and semi-quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI, including relative enhancement (RE), maximum enhancement (ME), maximum relative enhancement (MRE), time to peak (TTP), wash-in rates (WIR), wash-out rates (WOR), brevity of enhancement (BRE), and area under the curve (AUC) were measured on lesions (TD or MLN) and RC. The parameters were compared between TD and MLN, tumor with and without TD group by using Fisher's exact test, independent-samples t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test. The ratio (lesion-to-tumor) of the parameters was compared between TD and MLN. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were used to assess the diagnostic ability of single and combined metrics for distinguishing TD from MLN. Results The morphological features, including size, shape, and border, were significantly different between TD and MLN. TD exhibited significantly lower RE, MRE, RE-ratio, MRE-ratio, ADC(min)-ratio, and ADC(mean)-ratio than MLN. RE-ratio showed the highest AUC (0.749) and accuracy (77.97%) among single parameters. The combination of DCE-MRI and DWI parameters together showed higher diagnostic efficiency (AUC = 0.825). Conclusions Morphological features, ADC values, and DCE-MRI parameters can preoperatively help distinguish TD from MLN in RC. Key Points DWI and DCE-MRI can facilitate early detection and distinguishing mesorectal TD (tumor deposits) from MLN (metastaticlymph nodes) in rectal cancer preoperatively. TD has some specific morphological features, including relatively larger size, lower short- to long-axis ratio, irregular shape,and ill-defined border on T2-weighted MR images in rectal cancer. The combination of ADC values and semi-quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI (RE, MRE) can help to improve the diagnosticefficiency of TD in rectal cancer
引用
收藏
页码:4127 / 4137
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Distinguishing mesorectal tumor deposits from metastatic lymph nodes by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer
    Qiaoyu Xu
    Yanyan Xu
    Juan Wang
    Hongliang Sun
    Jie Lin
    Sheng Xie
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 4127 - 4137
  • [2] Discrimination of metastatic from non-metastatic mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer using quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Yu, Xiao-ping
    Wen, Lu
    Hou, Jing
    Wang, Hui
    Lu, Qiang
    JOURNAL OF HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 36 (04) : 594 - 600
  • [3] Discrimination of metastatic from non-metastatic mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer using quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Xiao-ping Yu
    Lu Wen
    Jing Hou
    Hui Wang
    Qiang Lu
    Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences], 2016, 36 : 594 - 600
  • [4] Discrimination of Metastatic from Non-metastatic Mesorectal Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer Using Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    于小平
    文露
    侯静
    王晖
    卢强
    Current Medical Science, 2016, 36 (04) : 594 - 600
  • [5] Discrimination between Metastatic and Nonmetastatic Mesorectal Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Yu, Xiao-ping
    Wen, Lu
    Hou, Jing
    Bi, Feng
    Hu, Pingsheng
    Wang, Hui
    Wang, Wei
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (04) : 479 - 485
  • [6] DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED AND DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION: PRELIMINARY RESULTS
    Valentini, Anna Lia
    Pinto, Francesco
    Totaro, Angelo
    Sacco, Emilio
    Volpe, Andrea
    Racioppi, Marco
    Gui, Beatrice
    Pierconti, Francesco
    Bonomo, Lorenzo
    Bassi, Pier Francesco
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 30 (04) : 1500 - 1500
  • [7] Evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Xu, H. D.
    Zhang, Y. Q.
    NEOPLASMA, 2017, 64 (03) : 430 - 436
  • [8] The Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using a Combination of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Zhu, Guangbin
    Luo, Jinwen
    Ouyang, Zhongmin
    Cheng, Zenglan
    Deng, Yi
    Guan, Yubao
    Du, Guoxin
    Zhao, Fengjin
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2021, 13 : 5287 - 5295
  • [9] Diagnosis value of 3.0 T diffusion-weighted imaging with background suppression magnetic resonance for metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer
    庄晓瞾
    外科研究与新技术, 2012, 21 (01) : 22 - 22
  • [10] Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Oncology in R
    Whitcher, Brandon
    Schmid, Volker J.
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2011, 44 (05): : 1 - 29