E-prescription: views and acceptance of general practitioners and pharmacists in Greater Sydney

被引:2
|
作者
Lau, Phyllis [1 ,2 ]
Tran, Minh Thuan [1 ]
Kim, Ricky Yong [1 ]
Alrefae, Alsayed Hashem [1 ]
Ryu, Sangwoo [1 ]
Teh, Jim Chyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Med, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia
[2] Western Sydney Univ, Translat Hlth Res Inst, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia
关键词
barriers; community pharmacists; facilitators; general practitioners; healthcare providers; perceptions; technology acceptance model; telehealth; ELECTRONIC PRESCRIPTION;
D O I
10.1071/PY22240
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundElectronic prescription (e-prescription) was introduced in 2020 in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic. This research aimed to explore general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists' experience with, and facilitators and barriers to, the use of e-prescription.MethodsThis qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with GPs and pharmacists in Greater Sydney to explore their experience with e-prescription. Thematic analysis used descriptive and mixed inductive and deductive approaches. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was used to further interpret and organise the themes.ResultsEleven GPs and nine pharmacists were interviewed. Thirteen themes were elicited, seven of which were categorised as benefits (facilitators) and six were challenges (barriers). Four facilitator themes (convenience for healthcare providers (HCPs) and patients, addressing issues with paper prescriptions, contactless nature reducing access barriers during COVID-19 lockdown, and enabling patients to manage multiple prescriptions) were mapped to the TAM construct of 'perceived usefulness'; and one facilitator (an easier process) and two barrier themes (lack of information during implementation, and technological issues) were mapped to the TAM construct of 'perceived ease of use'. Themes that fell outside these constructs were separately categorised: four barrier themes (reluctance of some patients and HCPs to change, patient expectations of 'instant prescription' and lost opportunities for best-practice care, HCPs' perceptions of inadequate governmental governance, and ongoing costs) were 'other issues with e-prescription', and two facilitator themes (providing training on the use of e-prescription for HCPs and patients, and making e-prescription more streamlined) were 'suggestions to improve'.ConclusionThere are many facilitators and barriers to the use of e-prescription. Our findings may inform the future promotion of e-prescription post-COVID-19 pandemic. Further research should focus on consumers' perspectives of e-prescription. It is inevitable that electronic prescriptions will one day supersede paper prescriptions, but there is resistance to their implementation at the practitioner and patient levels. This paper explored GPs and pharmacists' experience and views, and found that while e-prescription improves the quality of patient care, there are several challenges to its effective use. Findings may inform the future promotion of e-prescription, particularly post-COVID-19 pandemic, and guide future research in exploring consumer perspectives.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] e-Prescription: what are the benefits and challenges for general practitioners and community pharmacists
    Lau, Phyllis
    Bailey, Jannine
    Wong, Kam
    Alrefae, Hashem
    Kim, Ricky
    Ryu, Sangwoo
    Teh, Jim
    Tran, Josh
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2022, 28 (04) : XXVIII - XXVIII
  • [2] Physicians' and Pharmacists' Opinions Regarding the e-Prescription Systems
    Nikou, Giorgos
    Gallos, Parisis
    [J]. DIGITAL PERSONALIZED HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2020, 270 : 1351 - 1352
  • [3] Implementation of E-prescription for Multidose Dispensed Drugs: Qualitative Study of General Practitioners' Experiences
    Gullslett, Monika Knudsen
    Bergmo, Trine Strand
    [J]. JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [4] ANALYSIS OF E-PRESCRIPTION SYSTEM AND AWARENESS OF PHARMACISTS ON REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM IN UKRAINE
    Maksymovych, N.
    Zaliska, O.
    Huz, V
    Brezden, O.
    Solovei, A.
    Zabolotnya, Z.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S243 - S243
  • [5] The "Nonrefundable" Using: a Comparative Study of General Practitioners and Community Pharmacists' Views from Prescription to Delivery
    Birebent, Jordan
    Dupouy, Julie
    Bismuth, Michel
    Magnaval, Vincent
    Despas, Fabien
    Alquier, Vincent
    Oustric, Stephane
    [J]. THERAPIE, 2014, 69 (05): : 401 - 417
  • [6] Electronic transfer of prescription-related information: comparing views of patients, general practitioners, and pharmacists
    Porteous, T
    Bond, C
    Robertson, R
    Hannaford, P
    Reiter, E
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2003, 53 (488): : 204 - 209
  • [7] Attitudes to and use of a modified prescription form by general practitioners and pharmacists
    Liddell, MJ
    Goldman, SP
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1998, 168 (07) : 322 - 325
  • [8] General practitioners' views on over the counter sales by community pharmacists
    Erwin, J
    Britten, N
    Jones, R
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7031): : 617 - 618
  • [9] General practitioners' views on pharmacists in the primary health care system in Iceland
    Bloendal, Anna Bryndis
    Almarsdottir, Anna Birna
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2015, 37 : 9 - 10
  • [10] Doping awareness, views, and experience: a comparison between general practitioners and pharmacists
    Auersperger, Irena
    Topic, Mojca Doupona
    Maver, Petra
    Pusnik, Vika Kufersin
    Osredkar, Josko
    Lainscak, Mitja
    [J]. WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2012, 124 (1-2) : 32 - 38