Waitlist and transplant outcomes in heart transplant candidates bridged with temporary endovascular right ventricular assist devices

被引:1
|
作者
Kwon, Jennie H. [1 ]
Skidmore, Savannah H. [1 ]
Bhandari, Krishna [1 ]
Carnicelli, Anthony P. [2 ]
Yourshaw, Jeffrey P. [2 ]
Shorbaji, Khaled [1 ]
Kilic, Arman [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Charleston, SC USA
[2] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Cardiol, Charleston, SC USA
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Cardiothorac Surg, 30 Courtenay Dr,MSC 295,Suite BM279, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
来源
关键词
right ventricular assist device; heart transplantation; biventricular heart failure; heart allocation policy; mechanical circulatory support; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; MICROAXIAL PUMP; LUMEN CANNULA; IMPLANTATION; FAILURE; IMPACT; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2023.11.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Advances in mechanical circulatory support and changes in allocation policy have shifted waitlisting practices for heart transplantation (HT) in the United States. This analysis reports waitlist and transplant outcomes among HT candidates bridged with temporary endovascular right ventricular assist devices (tRVADs). METHODS: Patients awaiting HT from 2008 to 2022 in the United Network of Organ Sharing registry were grouped by the presence of tRVAD while waitlisted and propensity matched. Waitlist outcomes were HT and a competing outcome of death/deterioration requiring waitlist inactivation. Competing-risks regression was used to model waitlist outcomes. Subanalyses were performed to compare waitlist outcomes among patients with durable and temporary left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) with and without concomitant tRVADs. One-year posttransplant mortality was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Of 41,507 HT candidates, 133 (0.3%) had tRVADs. After propensity matching, patients with tRVAD had a similar likelihood of HT and an elevated hazard for death/deterioration (hazard ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.4-3.2, p < 0.001) compared to those without tRVAD. Most patients with tRVAD (84%) had concomitant LVADs. tRVAD was associated with an elevated risk for deterioration/death among those with temporary LVADs but not durable LVADs. For patients undergoing HT, tRVAD was associated with an increased risk for 1 -year mortality compared to propensitymatched recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Bridging with tRVAD is uncommon and primarily used in patients requiring biventricular support. tRVADs are associated with waitlist inactivation or death, particularly with concomitant temporary LVAD support. As temporary devices are increasingly used as a bridge to HT, outcomes of patients with tRVADs should inform future allocation policy, particularly for candidates with biventricular failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024;43:369-378 (c) Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 378
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Waitlist and Transplant Outcomes in Heart Transplant Candidates Bridged with Temporary Right Ventricular Assist Devices
    Kwon, J. H.
    Bhandari, K.
    Carnicelli, A.
    Yourshaw, J.
    Shorbaji, K.
    Kilic, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 42 (04): : S25 - S25
  • [2] Ventricular Assist Device Utilization in Heart Transplant Candidates Nationwide Variability and Impact on Waitlist Outcomes
    Truby, Lauren K.
    Garan, A. Reshad
    Givens, Raymond C.
    Takeda, Koji
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Trinh, Pauline N.
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Farr, Maryjane A.
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Colombo, Paolo C.
    Topkara, Veli K.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2018, 11 (04)
  • [3] Clinical outcomes in sensitized heart transplant patients bridged with ventricular assist devices
    Kidambi, Sumanth
    Mohamedali, Burhan
    Bhat, Geetha
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 29 (06) : 499 - 505
  • [4] Comparison of Transplant Waitlist Outcomes for Pediatric Candidates Supported by Ventricular Assist Devices Versus Medical Therapy
    Law, Sabrina P.
    Oron, Assaf P.
    Kemna, Mariska S.
    Albers, Erin L.
    McMullan, D. Michael
    Chen, Jonathan M.
    Law, Yuk M.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (05) : 442 - 450
  • [5] Pediatric Heart Transplant Waitlist Mortality in the Era of Ventricular Assist Devices
    Zafar, F.
    Khan, M. S.
    Bryant, R.
    Castleberry, C.
    Lorts, A.
    Wilmot, I.
    Jefferies, J. L.
    Chin, C.
    Morales, D. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 33 (04): : S18 - S18
  • [6] Posttransplant Long-Term Outcomes for Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices on the Heart Transplant Waitlist
    Whitbread, James J.
    Etchill, Eric W.
    Giuliano, Katherine A.
    Suarez-Pierre, Alejandro
    Lawton, Jennifer S.
    Hsu, Steven
    Sharma, Kavita
    Choi, Chun W.
    Higgins, Robert S. D.
    Kilic, Ahmet
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2022, 68 (08) : 1054 - 1062
  • [7] Cognitive outcomes in pediatric heart transplant recipients bridged to transplantation with ventricular assist devices
    Stein, Mary Lynette
    Bruno, Jennifer L.
    Konopacki, Kelly L.
    Kesler, Shelli
    Reinhartz, Olaf
    Rosenthal, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 32 (02): : 212 - 220
  • [8] Psychiatric problems of heart transplant candidates with left ventricular assist devices
    Baba A.
    Hirata G.
    Yokoyama F.
    Kenmoku K.
    Tsuchiya M.
    Kyo S.
    Toyoshima R.
    [J]. Journal of Artificial Organs, 2006, 9 (4) : 203 - 208
  • [9] Clinical Outcomes in Sensitized Heart Transplant Patients Bridged with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.
    Aggarwal, A.
    Gause, A.
    Nguyen, C.
    Balanlayos, I.
    Bhat, G.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 13 : 455 - 456
  • [10] Quality of life outcomes after heart transplantation in individuals bridged to transplant with ventricular assist devices
    Dew, MA
    Kormos, RL
    Winowich, S
    Harris, RC
    Stanford, EA
    Carozza, L
    Griffith, BP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 20 (11): : 1199 - 1212