Comparison of enamel demineralization and periodontal status between direct and digital indirect bonding techniques A split-mouth clinical trial of direct vs. digital indirect bonding

被引:0
|
作者
Cokakoglu, Serpil [1 ]
Cakir, Ezgi [2 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, TR-20160 Denizli, Turkiye
[2] Pamukkale Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Denizli, Turkiye
关键词
Tooth demineralization; Dental caries; Dental white spots; Excessive adhesive flash; Orthodontic brackets; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; PREVALENCE; BRACKETS; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1007/s00056-023-00481-3
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThis randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effects of digital indirect bonding (DIB) compared to the direct bonding (DB) technique in terms of enamel demineralization and periodontal status.Materials and methodsA total of 24 patients (17 females, 7 males) with a mean age of 13.83 & PLUSMN; 1.55 years were bonded using DB and DIB techniques using a split-mouth study design. Bonding techniques were randomly allocated to quadrants. Demineralization measurements were performed with the DIAGNOdent pen (Kavo, Biberach, Germany) from four sides (distal, gingival, mesial, and incisal/occlusal) of all brackets immediately after bonding, 1 month (T1), and 6 months (T2) after bonding. Periodontal measurements were taken before bonding and at the same time points (T1 and T2). Data were statistically analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test to determine possible differences between groups.ResultsIncisal/occlusal sides exhibited the lowest demineralization values at T2. The gingival side of upper centrals, mesial side of upper laterals, and distal sides of upper first premolar and lower laterals brackets bonded with the DIB technique exhibited significantly increased demineralization compared with the DB technique from T0 to T2 (p < 0.05). Periodontal parameters increased 1 month after bonding and decreased during the follow-up. Bonding technique showed no statistically significant difference in plaque index, gingival index, and bleeding on probing values at any time interval.ConclusionThere were many locations around the brackets with significantly higher demineralization after 6 months in patients who received digital indirect bonding compared to the DB group. Although periodontal health was generally adequate, complete removal of adhesive flash should be carefully carried out to decrease the risk of demineralization during indirect bonding technique with digital workflows.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Comparison of enamel demineralization and periodontal status between direct and digital indirect bonding techniquesA split-mouth clinical trial of direct vs. digital indirect bondingVergleich der Schmelzdemineralisierung und des parodontalen Status zwischen direkter und digitaler indirekter BondingtechnikEine klinische Split-mouth-Studie mit direktem vs. digitalem indirektem Bonding
    Serpil Çokakoğlu
    Ezgi Çakır
    Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 2024, 85 (6): : 414 - 424
  • [2] Direct versus fully digital indirect bracket bonding: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial on accuracy
    Pauline M.J. Hoekstra-van Hout
    Jan Willem M. Hoekstra
    Robin Bruggink
    Ewald M. Bronkhorst
    Edwin M. Ongkosuwito
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 28 (10)
  • [3] Comparison of the accuracy of bracket placement between direct and indirect bonding techniques
    Koo, BC
    Chung, CH
    Vanarsdall, RL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1999, 116 (03) : 346 - 351
  • [4] Comparison of the accuracy of bracket positioning between direct and digital indirect bonding techniques in the maxillary arch: a three-dimensional study
    Rami Aboujaoude
    Roland Kmeid
    Carine Gebrael
    Elie Amm
    Progress in Orthodontics, 23
  • [5] Comparison of the accuracy of bracket positioning between direct and digital indirect bonding techniques in the maxillary arch: a three-dimensional study
    Aboujaoude, Rami
    Kmeid, Roland
    Gebrael, Carine
    Amm, Elie
    PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [6] Comparison of Accuracy of Bracket Placement by Direct and Indirect Bonding Techniques using Digital Processing - An In-vitro Study
    Kalra, Ravneet K.
    Mittal, Sanjay
    Gandikota, Chandrashekhar
    Sehgal, Vikas
    Gupta, Rajiv
    Bali, Zarina
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2018, 12 (09) : ZC7 - ZC11
  • [7] A clinical comparison of bracket bond failures in association with direct and indirect bonding
    Thiyagarajah, S.
    Spary, D. J.
    Rock, W. P.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2006, 33 (03) : 198 - 204
  • [8] CLINICAL COMPARISON OF DIRECT VERSUS INDIRECT BONDING WITH DIFFERENT BRACKET TYPES AND ADHESIVES
    ZACHRISSON, BU
    BROBAKKEN, BO
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1978, 74 (01) : 62 - 78
  • [9] A comparison of bond strength between direct- and indirect-bonding methods
    Linn, BJ
    Berzins, DW
    Dhuru, VB
    Bradley, TG
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2006, 76 (02) : 289 - 294
  • [10] Digital assessment of direct and virtual indirect bonding of orthodontic brackets: A clinical prospective cross-sectional comparative investigation
    Panayi, Nearchos C.
    Tsolakis, Apostolos I.
    Athanasiou, Athanasios E.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHODONTICS, 2020, 18 (04) : 714 - 721