Comparison of Newly Proposed LDL-Cholesterol Estimation Equations

被引:2
|
作者
Jeong, Yong Whi [1 ]
Koo, Jun Hyuk [2 ,8 ]
Huh, Ji Hye [3 ]
Kim, Young-Jin [4 ]
Jeong, Hoyeon [1 ]
Kim, Eun Young [5 ]
Kang, Dae Ryong [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Biostat, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Wonju Ind Acad Cooperat Fdn, Wonju, South Korea
[3] Hallym Univ, Sacred Heart Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol & Metab, Anyang, South Korea
[4] Seoul Clin Labs Biobank, Yongin, South Korea
[5] Songho Univ, Dept Biomed Lab Sci, Hoengseong, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Wonju Coll Med, Dept Precis Med, Wonju, South Korea
[7] Yonsei Univ, Wonju Coll Med, Dept Precis Med, 20 Ilsan Ro, Wonju 26426, South Korea
[8] Hlth Insurance Review & Assessment Serv HIRA, HIRA Res Inst, Wonju, South Korea
关键词
Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; Estimation Equation; Friedewald Equation; Triglycerides; DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; FRIEDEWALD EQUATION; FORMULA; TRIGLYCERIDE; VALIDATION; LIPIDS;
D O I
10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e145
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is an important marker highly associated with cardiovascular disease. Since the direct measurement of it is inefficient in terms of cost and time, it is common to estimate through the Friedewald equation developed about 50 years ago. However, various limitations exist since the Friedewald equation was not designed for Koreans. This study proposes a new low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation equation for South Koreans using nationally approved statistical data.Methods: This study used data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2009 to 2019. The 18,837 subjects were used to develop the equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The subjects included individuals with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels directly measured among those with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and total cholesterol measured. We compared twelve equations developed in the previous studies and the newly proposed equation (model 1) developed in this study with the actual low-density lipoprotein cholesterol value in various ways. Results: The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol value estimated using the estimation formula and the actual low-density lipoprotein cholesterol value were compared using the root mean squared error. When the triglyceride level was less than 400 mg/dL, the root mean squared of the model 1 was 7.96, the lowest compared to other equations, and the model 2 was 7.82. The degree of misclassification was checked according to the NECP ATP III 6 categories. As a result, the misclassification rate of the model 1 was the lowest at 18.9%, and Weighted Kappa was the highest at 0.919 (0.003), which means it significantly reduced the underestimation rate shown in other existing estimation equations. Root mean square error was also compared according to the change in triglycerides level. As the triglycerides level increased, the root mean square error showed an increasing trend in all equations, but it was confirmed that the model 1 was the lowest compared to other equations.Conclusion: The newly proposed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation equation showed significantly improved performance compared to the 12 existing estimation sophisticated estimates in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of LDL-cholesterol estimate using the Friedewald formula and the newly proposed de Cordova formula with a directly measured LDL-cholesterol in a healthy South African population
    Onyenekwu, Chinelo P.
    Hoffmann, Mariza
    Smit, Francois
    Matsha, Tandi E.
    Erasmus, Rajiv T.
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2014, 51 (06) : 672 - 679
  • [2] Comparison of equations for the calculation of LDL-cholesterol in hospitalized patients
    Martins, J.
    Olorunju, S. A. S.
    Murray, L. M.
    Pillay, T. S.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2015, 444 : 137 - 142
  • [3] LDL-CHOLESTEROL EQUATIONS AND SI UNITS
    TINKER, LF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1991, 53 (04): : 982 - 982
  • [4] LDL-CHOLESTEROL EQUATIONS AND SL UNITS - REPLY
    MASSE, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1991, 53 (04): : 983 - 983
  • [5] Evaluation of equations for calculating LDL-cholesterol in patients with concomitant hypertriglyceridemia and low LDL-cholesterol: is there a preferred equation?
    Barakett-Hamade, Vanda
    Ghayad, Jean-Pierre
    Sleilaty, Ghassan
    ANNALES DE BIOLOGIE CLINIQUE, 2023, 81 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [6] Comparison of LDL-Cholesterol Estimate using Various Formulae with Directly Measured LDL-Cholesterol in Indian Population
    Wadhwa, Nishtha
    Krishnaswamy, Radhika
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (12) : BC11 - BC13
  • [7] Comparison and Validation of 10 Equations Including a Novel Method for Estimation of LDL-cholesterol in a 168,212 Asian Population
    Rim, John Hoon
    Lee, Yong-ho
    Lee, Myung Ha
    Kim, Ha Yan
    Choi, Jiin
    Lee, Byung-Wan
    Kang, Eun Seok
    Lee, Hyun Chul
    Kim, Jeong-Ho
    Lee, Sang-Guk
    Cha, Bong-Soo
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (14)
  • [8] The impact of low serum triglyceride on LDL-cholesterol estimation
    Ahmadi, Seyed-Ali
    Boroumand, Mohammad-Ali
    Gohari-Moghaddam, Katayoun
    Tajik, Parvin
    Dibaj, Seyed-Mohammad
    ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 2008, 11 (03) : 318 - 321
  • [9] Comparison of Equations for the Calculation of LDL-Cholesterol in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Data from Iranian Registry
    Vaseghi, Golnaz
    Rezvanian, Parastesh
    Taheri, Marzieh
    Sadri, Mohammad Amin
    Amerizadeh, Atefeh
    Javanmard, Shaghayegh Haghjooy
    Shekarchizadeh, Masoud
    Hosseinkhani, Ramesh
    Pourmoghadas, Ali
    Najafian, Jamshid
    Sarrafzadegan, Nizal
    TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 50 (04): : 270 - 275
  • [10] Evaluation of two automated direct LDL-cholesterol assays: the Cobas Integra LDL-cholesterol and EZ LDL-cholesterol methods.
    Lim, P
    Omar, A
    Sethi, S
    Aw, TC
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 46 (06) : A100 - A100