共 50 条
Aortic propagation velocity in predicting coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
被引:0
|作者:
Ghaderi, Fereshteh
[1
]
Niroomand, Shabnam
[2
]
Poorzand, Hoorak
[1
]
Alimi, Hedieh
[1
]
Bigdelu, Laila
[1
]
Fazlinezhad, Afsoon
[1
]
Keihanian, Faeze
[1
,3
]
机构:
[1] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Cardiovasc Dept, Echocardiog Lab, Mashhad, Iran
[2] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Community Med Dept, Mashhad, Iran
[3] Azadi Sq, Faulty Med, Mashhad, Iran
来源:
关键词:
aortic propagation velocity;
arterial stiffness;
coronary artery disease;
echocardiography;
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC PARAMETER;
STIFFNESS;
HYPERTENSION;
PRESSURE;
STRESS;
D O I:
10.1097/MD.0000000000034243
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Introduction:Coronary artery disease (CAD) and its outcome, myocardial infarction, is yet a significant etiology of mortality and morbidity nowadays. The aortic propagation velocity (APV) can be a simple, straightforward and novel echocardiographic index for the risk stratification in the evaluation of CAD. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the predictive role of APV in CAD. Material and methods:Relevant electronic bibliographies (PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, EMbase, the Cochrane library) were explored. Related reports were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using the Comprehensive Meta-analysis 2.0 software. Results:Eventually, 5 articles met the inclusion criteria and included in the meta-analysis. Five studies with 490 patients reported the APV mean in CAD and non-CAD groups. A random-effect model was used and the pooled findings demonstrated a significant higher APV in non-CAD group compared to CAD group (SMD: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.70-3.07, P < .001, I-2: 84%, Q: 19.03). The diagnostic value of APV in predicting CAD showed 86.3% sensitivity (95% CI: 74-91, P value < .001, I-2: 65%, Q: 8.53, P value: .03) and 83.8% specificity (95% CI: 69-94, P value < .001, I-2: 60%, Q: 9.89, P value: .01). Conclusion:There was a predictive role of APV in CAD with suitable specificity and sensitivity. Moreover, aortic distensibility and aortic strain were significantly different in CAD and non-CAD patients. APV could be used as a good noninvasive tool for screening CAD.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文