THE EFFECTS OF R&D AND ITS DIFFERENT TYPES ON FIRM PRODUCTIVITY: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA

被引:1
|
作者
Guo, Y. U. A. N. Y. U. A. N. [1 ]
Gao, P. I. N. G. [2 ]
Cheng, D. A. O. J. I. N. [3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Sch Econ & Management, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Manchester, Global Dev Inst, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, England
[3] Qufu Normal Univ, Sch Econ, Rizhao 276825, Peoples R China
关键词
Firm productivity; R&D; research activity; development activity; R&D composition; generalised propensity score (GPS); BASIC RESEARCH; INDUSTRIAL-RESEARCH; SPILLOVERS; KNOWLEDGE; PERFORMANCE; GROWTH; DETERMINANTS; INCREASE; RETURNS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1142/S1363919622500657
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper employs the Olley and Pakes [(1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6), 1263-1297.] method and the generalised propensity score (GPS) methodology to estimate the effects of R & D and its different types, including research activity and development activity, on productivity. Our research sample is an unbalanced panel data consisting of 1808 Chinese listed manufacturing firms from the period 2006-2015. Our analysis reveals how R & D and its different types impact firm productivity: (1) there exists an S-shaped relationship between firm R & D intensity and productivity, which implies the existence of the threshold and diminishing marginal return of R & D for productivity growth. Due to the unbalanced composition of R & D in China, after R & D intensity reaches a critical level (around 50%) a negative marginal effect of R & D presents; (2) an increase of research intensity can improve firm productivity. However, research intensity reaches a saturation point (around 65%) beyond which firm productivity plateaus; (3) there exists an inverted U-shaped relationship between firm development intensity and productivity. The marginal effect of development on firm productivity is negative when development intensity is over 28%. Our empirical evidence implies that firms need to optimise the composition of R & D expenditure in order to realise sustained productivity growth.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] University R&D and firm productivity: Evidence from Italy
    Medda G.
    Piga C.
    Siegel D.S.
    [J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2004, 30 (1-2) : 199 - 205
  • [2] How ICT and R&D affect productivity? Firm level evidence for China
    Zhu, Facang
    Li, Qianqian
    Yang, Shichun
    Balezentis, Tomas
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2021, 34 (01): : 3468 - 3486
  • [3] R&D Investments and Firm Value: Evidence from China
    Kim, Woo Sung
    Park, Kunsu
    Lee, Sang Hoon
    Kim, Hongyoung
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (11):
  • [4] Clustering effects on firm exporting with productivity-enhancing R&D in China
    Howell, Anthony
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2019, 42 (11): : 3168 - 3187
  • [5] Types of R&D investment and firm productivity: UK evidence on heterogeneity and complementarity in rates of return
    Solomon, Edna Maeyen
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 30 (05) : 536 - 563
  • [6] Firm size and R&D subsidy incentives: evidence from China
    Cheng, Hua
    [J]. 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 2006, : 399 - 401
  • [7] R&D tax credits and firm innovation: Evidence from China
    Chen, Ling
    Yang, Wenhui
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 146 : 233 - 241
  • [8] R&D reporting methods and firm value: evidence from China
    Wang, Yanni
    Fan, Weiguo
    [J]. CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2014, 8 (03) : 375 - 396
  • [9] Public support to R&D, productivity, and spillover effects: Firm-level evidence from Chile
    Cresoi, Gustavo
    Figal Garone, Lucas
    Maffioli, Alessandro
    Stein, Ernesto
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 130
  • [10] Government support, different types of collaborative R&D input, and performance: evidence from China
    Cheng, Hua
    Zhang, Zhiying
    Mvondo, Joseph Martial Nkongo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2022, 88 (01) : 51 - 70