Eat or be eaten: Implications of potential exploitative competition between wolves and humans across predator-savvy and predator-naive deer populations

被引:0
|
作者
Candler, Ellen M. [1 ,4 ]
Chakrabarti, Stotra [2 ]
Severud, William J. [3 ]
Bump, Joseph K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Fisheries Wildlife & Conservat Biol, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Macalester Coll, Dept Biol, St Paul, MN USA
[3] South Dakota State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Management, Brookings, SD USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, 135 Skok Hall,2003 Upper Buford Circle, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
来源
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2023年 / 13卷 / 11期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
behavioral manipulation; human-wildlife conflict; olfactory cues; optimal foraging; predator recolonization; predator reintroduction; predator-prey interactions; WHITE-TAILED DEER; ANTIPREDATOR BEHAVIOR; ACTIVITY PATTERNS; RISK; HABITAT; PREY; DRIVES; MOOSE; LANDSCAPES; CARNIVORES;
D O I
10.1002/ece3.10694
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Recolonization of predators to their former ranges is becoming increasingly prevalent. Such recolonization places predators among their prey once again; the latter having lived without predation (from such predators) for a considerable time. This renewed coexistence creates opportunities to explore predation ecology at both fundamental and applied levels. We used a paired experimental design to investigate white-tailed deer risk allocation in the Upper and Lower Peninsulas (UP and LP) in Michigan, USA. Wolves are functionally absent in the LP, while deer in the UP coexist with a re-established wolf population. We treated 15 sites each in UP and LP with wolf olfactory cues and observed deer vigilance, activity, and visitation rates at the interface of habitat covariates using remote cameras. Such a paired design across wolf versus no-wolf areas allowed us to examine indirect predation effects while accounting for confounding parameters such as the presence of other predators and human activity. While wolf urine had no effect across most metrics in both UP and LP, we observed differences in deer activity in areas with versus without wolves. Sites treated with wolf urine in the UP showed a reduction in crepuscular deer activity, compared to control/novel-scent treated sites. Furthermore, we observed a strong positive effect of vegetation cover on deer vigilance in these sites. This indicates that simulated predator cues likely affect deer vigilance more acutely in denser habitats, which presumably facilitates predation success. Such responses were however absent among deer in the LP that are presumably naive toward wolf predation. Where human and non-human predators hunt shared prey, such as in Michigan, predators may constrain human hunting success by increasing deer vigilance. Hunters may avoid such exploitative competition by choosing hunting/bait sites located in open areas. Our results pertaining to fundamental predation ecology have strong applied implications that can promote human-predator coexistence. Recolonizing and reintroduced predators are increasingly common. We investigated the reaction of two different white-tailed deer populations (a wolf-savvy and a wolf-naive population) to wolf olfactory cues at hunter-bait sites. We found that habitat affected deer vigilance rather than the presence of wolf olfactory cues.image
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据