Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of autologous serum eye drops in dry eye syndrome
被引:3
|
作者:
Zheng, Na
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Chengdu 610032, Sichuan, Peoples R ChinaChengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Chengdu 610032, Sichuan, Peoples R China
Zheng, Na
[1
]
Zhu, Si-Quan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
China Med Univ, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, 2 Anzhen Rd, Beijing 100029, Peoples R ChinaChengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Chengdu 610032, Sichuan, Peoples R China
Zhu, Si-Quan
[2
]
机构:
[1] Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Chengdu 610032, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, 2 Anzhen Rd, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
BACKGROUNDAutologous serum eye drops (ASEDs), a novel treatment derived from blood serum, have emerged as a groundbreaking solution for managing dry eye syndrome (DES). These drops have shown significant promise in relieving the distressing symptoms of DES. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ASEDs compared to traditional treatments, which often prove inadequate or result in unwanted side effects, particularly in individuals with moderate-to-severe DES.AIMTo evaluate whether ASEDs are safer and more effective than conventional artificial tears in the treatment of moderate-to-severe DES.METHODSThis multi-centered randomized controlled trial included 240 patients with moderate-to-severe DES from three ophthalmology clinics in China. They were randomly assigned to receive either ASEDs or artificial tears for 12 wk. The primary outcome was the change in the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, with secondary outcomes including tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer I test, corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), and conjunctival impression cytology (CIC). Statistics analysis was performed using an analysis of covariance with adjustments made for baseline values.RESULTSOur findings revealed that both ASEDs and artificial tears significantly improved the OSDI score, TBUT, Schirmer I test, CFS, and CIC from baseline to week 12. The ASEDs group showed significantly greater improvement in all these measures than the artificial tears group (all P values < 0.05). The average difference in the OSDI score between the two cohorts was -10.3 (95% confidence interval: -13.6 to -7.0), indicating a substantial improvement in the ASEDs group. The occurrence of adverse events was comparable between cohorts, with no reports of severe adverse events.CONCLUSIONASEDs are more effective and safer than artificial tears for mitigating symptoms of moderate-to-severe DES. ASEDs could be an alternative/supplementary therapy for patients with DES less responsive to traditional treatments.
机构:
Inje Univ, Sanggye Paik Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South KoreaInje Univ, Sanggye Paik Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South Korea
Kang, Min-Ji
Lee, Jee Hye
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Inje Univ, Sanggye Paik Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South KoreaInje Univ, Sanggye Paik Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South Korea
Lee, Jee Hye
Hwang, Jehyung
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Inje Univ, Sanggye Paik Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South KoreaInje Univ, Sanggye Paik Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South Korea
Hwang, Jehyung
Chung, So-Hyang
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, 222 Banpo Daero, Seoul 06591, South KoreaInje Univ, Sanggye Paik Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South Korea