Development and evaluation of three automated media pooling and molecular diagnostic systems for the detection of SARS-CoV-2

被引:1
|
作者
Matsumura, Yasufumi [1 ]
Noguchi, Taro [1 ]
Shinohara, Koh [1 ]
Yamamoto, Masaki [1 ]
Nagao, Miki [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Clin Lab Med, Kyoto, Japan
来源
MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM | 2024年 / 12卷 / 03期
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; pooling; automation; liquid handling instrument;
D O I
10.1128/spectrum.03684-23
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Pooled testing combined with molecular diagnostics for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 is a promising method that can increase testing capacities and save costs. However, pooled testing is also associated with the risks of decreased test sensitivity and specificity. To perform reliable pooled testing, we developed and validated three automated media pooling and molecular diagnostic systems. These pooling systems (geneLEAD-PS, Panther-PS, and Biomek-PS) comprised existing automated molecular detection platforms, corresponding automated media pooling devices, and laboratory information management systems. Analytical sensitivity analysis and mock sample evaluation were performed, and the obtained data were used to determine the sizes of the pool for the validation study. In the validation study, a total of 2,448, 3,228, and 6,420 upper respiratory samples were used for geneLEAD-PS, Panther-PS, and Biomek-PS, respectively, and the diagnostic performances were compared with the reference RT-PCR assay. A pool size of 6 for geneLEAD-PS and a pool size of 4 for Panther-PS and Biomek-PS were selected for the validation studies. All three systems showed high positive percent agreement values of >= 90.5% and negative percent agreement values of >= 99.8% for any specimen type. Pooled testing resulted in a 65%-71% reduction in cost per sample. The testing capacities of geneLEAD-PS, Panther-PS, and Biomek-PS were 144 samples in 3 hours, 384 samples in 5.5 hours, and 376 samples in 4 hours, respectively. The developed pooling systems showed robust diagnostic performances and will increase the testing capacities of molecular diagnostic tests while saving costs and may contribute to infection control of COVID-19.IMPORTANCEDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been surges in demand for accurate molecular diagnostic testing and laboratory supply shortages. Pooled testing combined with highly sensitive molecular testing, which entails mixing multiple samples as a single sample, is a promising approach to increase testing capacities while reducing the use of consumables. However, pooled testing is associated with risks that compromise diagnostic performance, such as false negatives due to dilution of positive samples or false positives due to cross-contamination. To perform reliable pooled testing, three different pooling systems (an automated pooling device, an automated molecular detection platform, and a laboratory information management system) were developed to accurately interpret pooled testing results. These three systems were validated using multiple clinical samples and showed high concordance with individual testing. The developed pooling systems will contribute to increasing reliable molecular testing capacities while using fewer consumables and saving costs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been surges in demand for accurate molecular diagnostic testing and laboratory supply shortages. Pooled testing combined with highly sensitive molecular testing, which entails mixing multiple samples as a single sample, is a promising approach to increase testing capacities while reducing the use of consumables. However, pooled testing is associated with risks that compromise diagnostic performance, such as false negatives due to dilution of positive samples or false positives due to cross-contamination. To perform reliable pooled testing, three different pooling systems (an automated pooling device, an automated molecular detection platform, and a laboratory information management system) were developed to accurately interpret pooled testing results. These three systems were validated using multiple clinical samples and showed high concordance with individual testing. The developed pooling systems will contribute to increasing reliable molecular testing capacities while using fewer consumables and saving costs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Sample Pooling for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA Using the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test
    McMillen, T.
    Jani, K.
    Babady, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 22 (11): : S38 - S38
  • [2] Molecular Diagnostic Tools for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Datta, Manali
    Singh, Desh Deepak
    Naqvi, Afsar R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEWS OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 40 (1-2) : 143 - 156
  • [3] Evaluation of Three Automated Extraction Systems for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Clinical Respiratory Specimens
    Lim, Ho-Jae
    Jung, Hye-Soo
    Park, Min-Young
    Baek, Young-Hyun
    Kannappan, Balaji
    Park, Jin-Young
    Yang, Jae-Hyun
    Seol, Ja-Hwan
    Lee, Min-Woo
    Jung, Sun-Kyung
    Lee, Sun-Hwa
    Park, Jung-Eun
    Yang, Yong-Jin
    [J]. LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [4] Development of Diagnostic Tests for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Nguyen, Ngan N. T.
    McCarthy, Colleen
    Lantigua, Darlin
    Camci-Unal, Gulden
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (11)
  • [5] Automated molecular testing of saliva for SARS-CoV-2 detection
    Matic, Nancy
    Lawson, Tanya
    Ritchie, Gordon
    Stefanovic, Aleksandra
    Leung, Victor
    Champagne, Sylvie
    Romney, Marc G.
    Lowe, Christopher F.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 100 (01)
  • [6] Saliva sample pooling for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Pasomsub, Ekawat
    Watcharananan, Siriorn P.
    Watthanachockchai, Treewat
    Rakmanee, Kingkan
    Tassaneetrithep, Boonrat
    Kiertiburanakul, Sasisopin
    Phuphuakrat, Angsana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (03) : 1506 - 1511
  • [7] Evaluation of automated antigen detection test for detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Mak, Gannon C. K.
    Lau, Stephen S. Y.
    Wong, Kitty K. Y.
    Chow, Nancy L. S.
    Lau, C. S.
    Ng, Ken H. L.
    Lam, Edman T. K.
    Chan, Rickjason C. W.
    Tsang, Dominic N. C.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 101 (04)
  • [8] Sample pooling strategies for SARS-CoV-2 detection
    Lagopati, Nefeli
    Tsioli, Panagiota
    Mourkioti, Ioanna
    Polyzou, Aikaterini
    Papaspyropoulos, Angelos
    Zafiropoulos, Alexandros
    Evangelou, Konstantinos
    Sourvinos, George
    Gorgoulis, Vassilis G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 289
  • [9] Comparison of three molecular diagnostic assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection: Evaluation of analytical sensitivity and clinical performance
    Kim, Ha Nui
    Yoon, Soo-Young
    Lim, Chae Seung
    Yoon, Jung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2022, 36 (02)
  • [10] Evaluation of Sample Pooling for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Nasopharyngeal Swab and Saliva Samples with the Idylla SARS-CoV-2 Test
    Hofman, Paul
    Allegra, Maryline
    Salah, Myriam
    Benzaquen, Jonathan
    Tanga, Virginie
    Bordone, Olivier
    Fayada, Julien
    Long-Mira, Elodie
    Lassalle, Sandra
    Lanteri, Elisabeth
    Lespinet-Fabre, Virginie
    Brest, Patrick
    Mograbi, Baharia
    Maniel, Charlotte
    Boutros, Jacques
    Leroy, Sylvie
    Heeke, Simon
    Hofman, Veronique
    Marquette, Charles-Hugo
    Ilie, Marius
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2021, 9 (03):