Study on landslide susceptibility mapping with different factor screening methods and random forest models

被引:2
|
作者
Gu, Tengfei [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jia [1 ]
Wang, Mingguo [3 ]
Duan, Ping [1 ]
Zhang, Yanke [4 ]
Cheng, Libo [1 ]
机构
[1] Yunnan Normal Univ, Fac Geog, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci Wuhan, Badong Natl Observat & Res Stn Geohazards, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Yunnan Inst Geol Surveying & Mapping Co Ltd, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Tianjihang Informat Technol Co Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 10期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SPATIAL PREDICTION; FREQUENCY RATIO; GIS; TREE; CLASSIFIER; RESERVOIR; PROVINCE; ENTROPY; REGION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0292897
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The number of input factors affects the prediction accuracy of a model. Factor screening plays an important role as the starting point for data input. The aim of this study is to explore the influence of different factor screening methods on the prediction results. Taking the 2014 landslide inventory of Jingdong County as an example, a landslide database was constructed based on 136 landslide events and 11 selected factors, which were randomly divided into a training dataset and a test dataset according to a ratio of 7:3. Four factor screening methods, namely, the information gain ratio (IGR), GeoDetector, Pearson correlation coefficient and multicollinearity test (MT), were selected to screen the factors. A random forest (RF) model was then used in combination with each factor set for landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM). Finally, accuracy validation was performed using confusion matrices and ROC curves. The results show that factor screening is beneficial in improving the accuracy of the resulting model compared to the original model. Second, the IGR_RF model had the highest AUC value (0.9334), which was higher than that of the MT_RF model without factor screening (0.9194), and the IGR_RF model predicted the most landslides in the very high susceptibility zone (51.22%), indicating the good prediction performance of the IGR_RF model. Finally, the factor weighting analysis revealed that NDVI, elevation and aspect had the greatest influence on landslides in Jingdong County and that curvature had the least influence on landslides. This study can provide a reference for factor screening in LSM.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A hybrid optimization method of factor screening predicated on GeoDetector and Random Forest for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Sun, Deliang
    Shi, Shuxian
    Wen, Haijia
    Xu, Jiahui
    Zhou, Xinzhi
    Wu, Jianping
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2021, 379
  • [2] A robust discretization method of factor screening for landslide susceptibility mapping using convolution neural network, random forest, and logistic regression models
    Zhao, Zheng
    Chen, Jianhua
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH, 2023, 16 (01) : 408 - 429
  • [3] Mapping landslide susceptibility and types using Random Forest
    Taalab, Khaled
    Cheng, Tao
    Zhang, Yang
    [J]. BIG EARTH DATA, 2018, 2 (02) : 159 - 178
  • [4] Landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid random forest with GeoDetector and RFE for factor optimization
    Zhou, Xinzhi
    Wen, Haijia
    Zhang, Yalan
    Xu, Jiahui
    Zhang, Wengang
    [J]. GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2021, 12 (05)
  • [5] A comparative assessment of canonical correlation forest, random forest, rotation forest and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Sahin, Emrehan Kutlug
    Colkesen, Ismail
    Kavzoglu, Taskin
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 35 (04) : 341 - 363
  • [6] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Random Forest and Boosted Regression Tree Models, and a Comparison of Their Performance
    Park, Soyoung
    Kim, Jinsoo
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [7] Landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid random forest with Geo Detector and RFE for factor optimization
    Xinzhi Zhou
    Haijia Wen
    Yalan Zhang
    Jiahui Xu
    Wengang Zhang
    [J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2021, 12 (05) : 361 - 379
  • [8] A comparative study of different neural network models for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Zhao, Zhan'ao
    He, Yi
    Yao, Sheng
    Yang, Wang
    Wang, Wenhui
    Zhang, Lifeng
    Sun, Qiang
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2022, 70 (02) : 383 - 401
  • [9] Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest and boosted tree models in Pyeong-Chang, Korea
    Kim, Jeong-Cheol
    Lee, Sunmin
    Jung, Hyung-Sup
    Lee, Saro
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 33 (09) : 1000 - 1015
  • [10] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING
    Yi, Yaning
    Zhang, Zhijie
    Zhang, Wanchang
    Xu, Chi
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS 2019), 2019, : 9318 - 9321