The Value of Organic plus. Analysing Consumers' Preference for Additional Ethical Attributes of Organic food Products

被引:6
|
作者
Rizzo, Giuseppina [1 ]
Testa, Riccardo [1 ]
Schifani, Giorgio [1 ]
Migliore, Giuseppina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Palermo, Dept Agr & Forest Sci, Viale Sci,Edificio 4, I-90128 Palermo, Italy
关键词
Eco-friendliness; Experimental auctions; Organic eggs; Local farmers; Sustainability; VALUE-ATTITUDE-BEHAVIOR; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; LOCAL FOOD; CONSUMPTION; PERCEPTIONS; DETERMINANTS; CHOICE; SUSTAINABILITY; INTENTIONS; PARADIGM;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-023-03123-8
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Organic Plus attributes strengthen the sustainability of the organic products and differentiate them from the 'conventionalized' organic ones. Products with Organic Plus attributes seem appreciated by organic consumers. However, research on consumers' preference for Organic Plus is still scarce, leaving gaps in the understanding of the consumers' characteristics of organic products with Plus attributes. In order to enrich the knowledge of consumers' preference for organic products with Plus attributes, the present study aims to achieve three Objectives: (1) identifying which Plus attributes, among fair prices to local farmers, integration of people with disabilities and eco-friendliness, are most sought after among Italian consumers of organic products (2) measuring, through the willingness to pay elicitation techniques, the level of preference for the various plus attributes; (3) determine which psychological, socio-demographic and contextual factors influence the purchasing choice of organic consumers for the three Plus attributes. Better knowledge of consumers' preference for organic Plus attributes, as well as the psychological and socio-demographic characteristic can provide useful indications to better-tailored marketing strategies on specific consumers' profiles.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Consumer preferences for additional ethical attributes of organic food
    Zander, Katrin
    Hamm, Ulrich
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2010, 21 (05) : 495 - 503
  • [2] Consumers' Preference Heterogeneity for GM and Organic Food Products in Germany
    Emberger-Klein, Agnes
    Zapilko, Marina
    Menrad, Klaus
    [J]. AGRIBUSINESS, 2016, 32 (02) : 203 - 221
  • [3] CONSUMERS' PERCEPTIONS OF ORGANIC FOOD PRODUCTS IN CROATIA
    Sugar, Tina
    Brscic, Kristina
    [J]. EKONOMSKI VJESNIK, 2020, 33 (01): : 227 - 241
  • [4] Consumer Attitudes towards Ethical Attributes of Organic Food
    Zander, Katrin
    Hamm, Ulrich
    [J]. GERMAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 59 (04): : 246 - 257
  • [5] Substitutes or Complements? Consumer Preference for Local and Organic Food Attributes
    Meas, Thong
    Hu, Wuyang
    Batte, Marvin T.
    Woods, Timothy A.
    Ernst, Stan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 97 (04) : 1044 - 1071
  • [6] Evaluation of consumers' purchasing process for organic food products
    Scuderi, Alessandro
    Bellia, Claudio
    Foti, Vera Teresa
    Sturiale, Luisa
    Timpanaro, Giuseppe
    [J]. AIMS AGRICULTURE AND FOOD, 2019, 4 (02): : 251 - 265
  • [7] Consumers' perceptions of organic food attributes and cognitive and affective attitudes as determinants of their purchase intentions toward organic food
    Lee, Hyun-Joo
    Yun, Zee-Sun
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2015, 39 : 259 - 267
  • [8] Not everybody prefers organic food: unobserved heterogeneity in US consumers' preference for organic apple and milk
    Kim, Seon-Woong
    Brorsen, B. Wade
    Lusk, Jayson
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 25 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [9] Organic Consumers' Profile and Their Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Selected Organic Food Products in Greece
    Krystallis, Athanassios
    Fotopoulos, Christos
    Zotos, Yiorgos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL CONSUMER MARKETING, 2006, 19 (01) : 81 - 106
  • [10] Consumers' Perceptions and Attitudes of Organic Food Products in Northern Thailand
    Sangkumchaliang, Parichard
    Huang, Wen-Chi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FOOD AND AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 15 (01): : 87 - 102