Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Graves' Disease Undergoing Total Thyroidectomy With or Without Near Infrared Autofluorescence Imaging

Background: The impact of near-infrared autofluorescence (NIRAF) imaging on postthyroidectomy hypocalcemia is controversial. As patients with Graves' disease are at increased risk, our aim was to compare postoperative parathyroid function in these patients undergoing total thyroidectomy (TT) with or without NIRAF imaging.Methods: This was a retrospective "before and after" study, comparing outcomes of patients who underwent TT without or with NIRAF imaging at a single center. Primary outcome was the incidence of temporary hypocalcemia and secondary outcomes, rates of incidental parathyroidectomy on final specimens and permanent hypocalcemia. Analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney U and chi-Square tests. Continuous data are expressed as median (interquartile range).Results: There were 85 patients in NIRAF and 100 patients in non-NIRAF group. Groups were comparable regarding age, gender, body-mass index, and thyroid weight. Number of parathyroid glands identified intraoperatively was 3 in both groups (p = 0.47). Intraoperative parathyroid implantation rate was 16.5% in NIRAF and 6% in non-NIRAF group (p = 0.02). Incidental parathyroidectomy rate on final pathology was 12.9% in NIRAF and 32% in non-NIRAF group (p = 0.002). The rates of temporary (11.7% vs. 16%) and permanent hypocalcemia (2.4% vs. 2%) were similar between the two groups, respectively (p = 0.66).Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first comparative study investigating the impact of NIRAF on postoperative parathyroid function after thyroidectomy for Graves' disease. The rate of incidental parathyroidectomy on final pathology was lower with use of NIRAF, without an impact on temporary or permanent hypocalcemia rates compared to conventional technique.