Identifying Critical Indicators in Performance Evaluation of Green Supply Chains Using Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making

被引:3
|
作者
Zhang, Changlu [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Liqian [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Informat Sci & Technol Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100192, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Informat Sci & Technol Univ, Beijing Key Lab Big Data Decis Making Green Dev, Beijing 100192, Peoples R China
关键词
green supply chain; performance evaluation; critical indicators; fuzzy DEMATEL-based ANP; MCDM;
D O I
10.3390/su15076095
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Performance evaluation of green supply chains (GSC) is an important tool to improve their comprehensive management. Identifying critical indicators is crucial to evaluation. This study examines the critical indicators in performance evaluations of GPC and provides relevant suggestions for managers to improve GSCs' performances. Firstly, we summarized 24 evaluation indicators from five dimensions-financial value, customer service-level, business processes, innovation and development, and the so-called green level. Secondly, the Delphi method was used to determine the formal research framework. The fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory based analytic network process (fuzzy DEMATEL-based ANP) model was applied. The weighted prominence of each indicator was calculated to identify those that were critical, and a causality diagram was constructed for them. Finally, corresponding countermeasures and implications regarding those were put forward. The research results show that the critical indicators include the return rate of net assets, the growth rate of profit, the rate of service satisfaction, market share, production flexibility, and the green consensus. Among them, the green consensus, the growth rate of profit and the rate of service satisfaction form a virtuous circle, leading to the improvement of the overall performance of GSC.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying Critical Risk Factors in Green Product Certification Using Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making
    Zhang, Changlu
    Zhang, Jian
    Yang, Qiong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [2] Business Sustainability Performance Evaluation for Taiwanese BanksA Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Lin, Arthur Jin
    Chang, Hai-Yen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (08):
  • [3] Evaluation of the Logistic Process Robotisation Using the Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making
    Cujan, Zdenek
    Marasova, Daniela
    TEM JOURNAL-TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATICS, 2018, 7 (03): : 501 - 506
  • [4] A Multiple-Criteria Decision-making Approach for the Evaluation of Retail Location
    Burnaz, Sebnem
    Topcu, Y.
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2006, 14 (1-3) : 67 - 76
  • [5] Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making approach for industrial green engineering
    Chiou, HK
    Tzeng, GH
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 30 (06) : 816 - 830
  • [6] Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Industrial Green Engineering
    HUA-KAI CHIOU
    GWO-HSHIUNG TZENG
    Environmental Management, 2002, 30 : 0816 - 0830
  • [7] A ranking method for multiple-criteria decision-making
    Borgulya, I
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 1997, 28 (09) : 905 - 912
  • [8] Hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making methods: A review of applications in engineering
    Zavadskas, E. K.
    Antucheviciene, J.
    Turskis, Z.
    Adeli, H.
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2016, 23 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [9] MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING - A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS
    HAIMES, YY
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1985, 15 (03): : 313 - 315