The impacts of different environmental regulations on firm's performance in China based on R&D investment, environmental innovation and non-environmental innovation

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Chen [1 ]
Yang, Xuanyu [2 ]
Xu, Hanming [3 ]
Ju, Hailong [1 ]
机构
[1] Guilin Univ Technol, Business Sch, Guilin, Peoples R China
[2] Changsha Normal Univ, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Dongguan Auto Technol Sch, Dongguan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Emission standard; emission trading system; firm performance; effect mechanism; HETEROGENEOUS INFLUENCE; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; TECHNOLOGY; POLICIES; BEHAVIOR; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2024.2337350
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Emission standard, as a kind of mandatory environmental regulation, stipulates the emission standard of pollutants. The emission trading system (ETS) is regarded as a typical market-based environmental regulation. This study examines the impacts of mandatory environmental regulation (SO2 emission standard) and market-based environmental regulation (SO2 ETS) on firm performance in China. Listed firms in China are selected as research samples and a difference-in-differences (DID) model is employed as an assessment method. The results indicate that mandatory environmental regulation only has a significantly positive impact on environmental performance. However, the ETS improves environmental performance and economic performance simultaneously. This study further explores the effect mechanisms between two environmental regulations and firm performance that R&D investment, environmental innovation and non-environmental innovation are selected as different effect mechanisms. There are no impacts of mandatory environmental regulation on R&D investment and environmental innovation. However, it finds that the ETS can effectively decrease the crowding-out effect of R&D and thus trigger environmental innovation of the firm. According to heterogeneity analysis, the effect of market-based environmental regulation is significant in those regions with higher intensity of environmental regulation. It does not find significant effects of mandatory environmental regulation and market-based environmental regulation in regions with lower regulatory intensity.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental innovation and R&D collaborations: Firm decisions in the innovation efficiency context
    Andriana G. Dimakopoulou
    Nikos Chatzistamoulou
    Kostas Kounetas
    Kostas Tsekouras
    [J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2023, 48 : 1176 - 1205
  • [2] Environmental innovation and R&D collaborations: Firm decisions in the innovation efficiency context
    Dimakopoulou, Andriana G.
    Chatzistamoulou, Nikos
    Kounetas, Kostas
    Tsekouras, Kostas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2023, 48 (04): : 1176 - 1205
  • [3] The Moderation of Environmental Dynamism between R&D Outsourcing and Firm Innovation Performance
    Bei, Wu
    Jin, Chen
    [J]. PICMET 2010: TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2010,
  • [4] Environmental regulation, R&D investment, and green technology innovation in China: Based on the PVAR model
    Zhang, Yueting
    Chen, Huaichao
    He, Zhimin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (10):
  • [5] R&D COLLABORATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION
    Pippel, Gunnar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 19 (01)
  • [6] Environmental regulations and enterprises innovation performance: the role of R&D investments and political connections
    Jintao Zhang
    Zhen Yang
    Li Meng
    Lu Han
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022, 24 : 4088 - 4109
  • [7] Environmental regulations and enterprises innovation performance: the role of R&D investments and political connections
    Zhang, Jintao
    Yang, Zhen
    Meng, Li
    Han, Lu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (03) : 4088 - 4109
  • [8] Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulations and foreign direct investment on green innovation across different regions in China
    Luo, Yusen
    Salman, Muhammad
    Lu, Zhengnan
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 759
  • [9] Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis
    Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan
    He, Qile
    Black, Andrew
    Ghobadian, Abby
    Gallear, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 155 : 79 - 92
  • [10] The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence
    Hung, Kuang-Peng
    Chou, Christine
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2013, 33 (10-11) : 368 - 380