Quantifying Measurement Uncertainty in the Critical Secant Gradient Function

被引:0
|
作者
Robbins, B. A. [1 ]
Griffiths, D. V. [2 ]
机构
[1] US Army Corps Engineers, Risk Management Ctr, Lakewood, CO 80228 USA
[2] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Golden, CO USA
关键词
BACKWARD; SCALE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The critical secant gradient function (CSGF) is a spatial function that defines the hydraulic conditions causing the progression of backward erosion piping, a significant internal erosion failure mode for dams and levees. While recent studies have defined the CSGF analytically and have also demonstrated how to measure it in the laboratory, uncertainty in measurements of the CSGF has not yet been quantified. In this study, a preliminary assessment of the uncertainty in measuring the CSGF is developed by analyzing the residual errors between the best estimate of the CSGF for each experiment and the measured values of the secant gradient at specific points. The results indicate that the errors in the best estimate of the measured CSGF are approximately normally distributed with a standard deviation of 7% for the experimental configuration used. Further research is needed to assess if this level of error is acceptable in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 113
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] QUANTIFYING MODEL UNCERTAINTY USING MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY STANDARDS
    Du, Xiaoping
    Shah, Harsheel
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2011, VOL 5, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 1161 - 1167
  • [2] Quantifying uncertainty in railway noise measurement
    Tutmez, Bulent
    Baranovskii, Andrei
    [J]. MEASUREMENT, 2019, 137 : 1 - 6
  • [3] Quantifying and addressing uncertainty in the measurement of interdisciplinarity
    Nakhoda, Maryam
    Whigham, Peter
    Zwanenburg, Sander
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2023, 128 (11) : 6107 - 6127
  • [4] Quantifying and addressing uncertainty in the measurement of interdisciplinarity
    Maryam Nakhoda
    Peter Whigham
    Sander Zwanenburg
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2023, 128 : 6107 - 6127
  • [5] Quantifying uncertainty in sampling and analytical measurement
    Wegscheider, W
    Zeiler, HJ
    Heindl, R
    Mosser, J
    [J]. ANNALI DI CHIMICA, 1997, 87 (3-4) : 273 - 283
  • [6] Quantifying Uncertainty in Critical Loads: (A) Literature Review
    R. A. Skeffington
    [J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2006, 169 : 3 - 24
  • [7] Quantifying Function: Status Critical
    Doucet, Barbara M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2014, 68 (02): : 123 - 126
  • [8] Quantifying uncertainty in critical loads: (A) literature review
    Skeffington, R
    [J]. WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2006, 169 (1-4): : 3 - 24
  • [9] Quantifying the measurement uncertainty using Bayesian inference
    Zanobini, A.
    Ciani, L.
    Pellegrini, G.
    [J]. 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ADVANCED METHODS FOR UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION IN MEASUREMENT, 2007, : 1 - +
  • [10] Quantifying input uncertainty in the calibration of water quality models: reordering errors via the secant method
    Wu, Xia
    Marshall, Lucy
    Sharma, Ashish
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2022, 26 (05) : 1203 - 1221