Contextual imperatives for effective shared instructional leadership: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Zhan, Xi [1 ]
Cao, Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
Shared instructional leadership; Teacher professionalization; International comparison; Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis; SCHOOL AUTONOMY; PRINCIPAL LEADERSHIP; COLLABORATIVE LEADERSHIP; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; STUDENT-ACHIEVEMENT; TEACHER-EDUCATION; IMPACT; EFFICACY; DECENTRALIZATION; ACCOUNTABILITY;
D O I
10.1108/JEA-07-2022-0109
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
PurposePrincipal instructional leadership and teacher participation in decision-making are conceptualized as shared instructional leadership (SIL) - a management philosophy that positively impacts student academic performance. However, the statistically meaningful relationship between SIL and student performance remains controversial as SIL functioning is influenced by various fundamental school conditions shaped by education policy, including high-stakes accountability, school autonomy and teacher professionalization. The authors examined the relationship between three SIL policy configurations and promising student performance: inclusion, exclusion and insensitive to SIL.Design/methodology/approachThe authors used fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis on data obtained from the Program for International Student Assessment (2015) results, including principals' responses to leadership questions and school conditions shaped by policy, and student science scores in 64 countries and areas.FindingsThe role of SIL in student performance varied among the three configurations, and the condition of teacher professionalization in the configuration was consistently associated with high student performance.Originality/valueSIL can create conditions for continued professional development of the teaching workforce in conjunction with school conditions shaped by policy.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 161
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Authentic Leadership and Job Satisfaction: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA)
    Baquero, Asier
    Delgado, Beatriz
    Escortell, Raquel
    Sapena, Juan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (08):
  • [2] Leadership succession and the performance of nonprofit organizations: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
    Li, Hui
    [J]. NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP, 2019, 29 (03): : 341 - 361
  • [3] Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
    Lee, Sophia Seung-yoon
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH, 2014, 36
  • [4] A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of factors influencing successful shared service center implementation
    Plugge, Albert
    Nikou, Shahrokh
    Janssen, Marijn
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2022, 122 (04) : 920 - 941
  • [5] A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Publications on the Fuzzy Sets Theory
    Castello-Sirvent, Fernando
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (08)
  • [6] Identifying effective market-shaping strategies: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis approach
    Nenonen, Suvi
    Storbacka, Kaj
    Sklyar, Alexey
    Kjellberg, Hans
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 123 : 12 - 30
  • [7] Configural analysis of the drinking man: Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analyses
    Eng, Sereikhuoch
    Woodside, Arch G.
    [J]. ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2012, 37 (04) : 541 - 543
  • [8] Α fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approach for the evaluation of corporate viability
    Evangelia Krassadaki
    Constantin Zopounidis
    Christos Lemonakis
    [J]. Operational Research, 2022, 22 : 3549 - 3570
  • [9] Knowledge Sharing in Catholic Organizations: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis
    Curado, Carla
    Graca, Joao
    Oliveira, Mirian
    Fernandes, Alexandra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 17 (03) : 31 - 49
  • [10] A novel application of fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to GEM data
    Coduras, Alicia
    Antonio Clemente, Jose
    Ruiz, Jesus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (04) : 1265 - 1270