Quantitative Electroencephalography Objectivity and Reliability in the Diagnosis and Management of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review

被引:2
|
作者
Amico, Francesco [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Koberda, Jaroslaw Lucas [3 ]
机构
[1] Neotherapy, Weston, FL USA
[2] Texas Ctr Lifestyle Med, Houston, TX USA
[3] Neurology PL, Tallahassee, FL USA
[4] Texas Ctr Lifestyle Med, 333 West Loop N Ste 250 Houston, Houston, TX 77024 USA
[5] Neotherapy, Level 2, 2225 N Commerce Pkwy Suite 6, Weston, FL 33326 USA
关键词
quantitative electroencephalography; qEEG; traumatic brain injury; TBI; concussion; ELECTRICAL-ACTIVITY BIOMARKER; EEG; INDEX; CONSCIOUSNESS; COMPLEXITY; DISORDERS; SEVERITY; POWER;
D O I
10.1177/15500594231202265
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Persons with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) may exhibit short- and long-term cognitive deficits as well as psychiatric symptoms. These symptoms often reflect functional anomalies in the brain that are not detected by standard neuroimaging. In this context, quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) is more suitable to evaluate non-normative activity in a wide range of clinical settings. Method. We searched the literature using the "Medline" and "Web of Science" online databases. The search was concluded on February 23, 2023, and revised on July 12, 2023. It returned 134 results from Medline and 4 from Web of Science. We then applied the PRISMA method, which led to the selection of 31 articles, the most recent one published in March 2023. Results. The qEEG method can detect functional anomalies in the brain occurring immediately after and even years after injury, revealing in most cases abnormal power variability and increases in slow (delta and theta) versus decreases in fast (alpha, beta, and gamma) frequency activity. Moreover, other findings show that reduced beta coherence between frontoparietal regions is associated with slower processing speed in patients with recent mild TBI (mTBI). More recently, machine learning (ML) research has developed highly reliable models and algorithms for the detection of TBI, some of which are already integrated into commercial qEEG equipment. Conclusion. Accumulating evidence indicates that the qEEG method may improve the diagnosis and management of TBI, in many cases revealing long-term functional anomalies in the brain or even neuroanatomical insults that are not revealed by standard neuroimaging. While FDA clearance has been obtained only for some of the commercially available equipment, the qEEG method allows for systematic, cost-effective, non-invasive, and reliable investigations at emergency departments. Importantly, the automated implementation of intelligent algorithms based on multimodally acquired, clinically relevant measures may play a key role in increasing diagnosis reliability.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A history and review of quantitative electroencephalography in traumatic brain injury
    Wallace, BE
    Wagner, AK
    Wagner, EP
    McDeavitt, JT
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2001, 16 (02) : 165 - 190
  • [2] Electroencephalography and Quantitative Electroencephalography in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Haneef, Zulfi
    Levin, Harvey S.
    Frost, James D., Jr.
    Mizrahi, Eli M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2013, 30 (08) : 653 - 656
  • [3] Diagnosis and Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Children A Systematic Review
    Lumba-Brown, Angela
    Yeates, Keith Owen
    Sarmiento, Kelly
    Breiding, Matthew J.
    Haegerich, Tamara M.
    Gioia, Gerard A.
    Turner, Michael
    Benzel, Edward C.
    Suskauer, Stacy J.
    Giza, Christopher C.
    Joseph, Madeline
    Broomand, Catherine
    Weissman, Barbara
    Gordon, Wayne
    Wright, David W.
    Moser, Rosemarie Scolaro
    McAvoy, Karen
    Ewing-Cobbs, Linda
    Duhaime, Ann-Christine
    Putukian, Margot
    Holshouser, Barbara
    Paulk, David
    Wade, Shari L.
    Herring, Stanley A.
    Halstead, Mark
    Keenan, Heather T.
    Choe, Meeryo
    Christian, Cindy W.
    Guskiewicz, Kevin
    Raksin, P. B.
    Gregory, Andrew
    Mucha, Anne
    Taylor, H. Gerry
    Callahan, James M.
    DeWitt, John
    Collins, Michael W.
    Kirkwood, Michael W.
    Ragheb, John
    Ellenbogen, Richard G.
    Spinks, T. J.
    Ganiats, Theodore G.
    Sabelhaus, Linda J.
    Altenhofen, Katrina
    Hoffman, Rosanne
    Getchius, Tom
    Gronseth, Gary
    Donnell, Zoe
    O'Connor, Robert E.
    Timmons, Shelly D.
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2018, 172 (11)
  • [4] Machine Learning Algorithms and Quantitative Electroencephalography Predictors for Outcome Prediction in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review
    Noor, Nor Safira Elaina Mohd
    Ibrahim, Haidi
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 102075 - 102092
  • [5] A systematic review of quantitative research on traumatic brain injury in India
    Massenburg, Benjamin B.
    Veetil, Deepa K.
    Raykar, Nakul P.
    Agrawal, Amit
    Roy, Nobhojit
    Gerdin, Martin
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2017, 65 (02) : 305 - 314
  • [6] Prophylactic hypothermia for traumatic brain injury: a quantitative systematic review
    Fox, James L.
    Vu, Erik N.
    Doyle-Waters, Mary
    Brubacher, Jeffrey R.
    Abu-Laban, Riyad
    Hu, Zengxuan
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 12 (04) : 355 - 364
  • [7] Economic Evaluations in the Diagnosis and Management of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Quality
    Alali, Aziz S.
    Burton, Kirsteen
    Fowler, Robert A.
    Naimark, David M. J.
    Scales, Damon C.
    Mainprize, Todd G.
    Nathens, Avery B.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (05) : 721 - 734
  • [8] Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in post-traumatic brain injury: A systematic review of diagnosis and management
    Gruhl, Sabrina Lasini
    Su, Jun
    Chua, Wei Chong
    Tay, Kon Voi
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 213
  • [9] Traumatic brain injury (TBI) diagnosis and treatment: A systematic review and update
    Chung, Pearl
    Khan, Fary
    BRAIN INJURY, 2014, 28 (5-6) : 744 - 745
  • [10] Electroencephalography and mild traumatic brain injury
    Thatcher, Robert W.
    FOUNDATIONS OF SPORT-RELATED BRAIN INJURIES, 2006, : 241 - 265